# 11 Alumni Stadium, Boston College

FINAL SCORE - 26.5
















Say what you will about this being a spite pick, but the cold hard truth is BC scraped the barrel of the rankings from four of us who all visited on separate occasions. My cousin went to BC and I have some great memories of partying with her friends on campus and going out in Beantown. But when it comes to its football culture, there is a lot to be desired. Nobody can deny that BC is a hockey school and that's not a bad thing. They, along with BU, have a proud history as one of the bastions of American hockey.

But this is a football stadiums ranking and the Eagles don't measure up. As one attendee described, "There's no bigger hole than Alumni Stadium and there's no worse collection of bitter, jealous and angry people than the B.C. 'superfans.'" Alumni Stadium resembles more a glorified high school stadium. There is little buzz around campus amongst the students and fans. The fact that most people have to park miles away and shuttle or walk to the stadium hurts the overall gameday vibe. There is a small parking lot near the stadium, but the school enforces ancient (read: lame) tailgating rules, only allowing fans to legally tailgate 2 hours before kickoff. Absurd. Boston is a terrific city to visit and walk around, but it's a T ride away from Chestnut Hill, so the direct surrounding area suffers a bit.

While the efforts of the Superfans is commendable and good for school spirit, the fact that this movement is still rather young is a shame. Notre Dame seems to draw out the best from the BC faithful. Whether or not this is simply school pride at its finest or BC students and fans putting on a mask of caring to convince Notre Dame they're not inferior when it comes to football. I'll be the first to admit that the Eagles have dealt us a few devastating losses over the years. The fans can relish that role all they want. But the fact remains that BC as a football team hasn't really accomplished much outside of these upset moments.

Counting Down Football's Cathedrals

If you're like us at We Is ND, then college football is in your blood. Saturdays are holy days of obligation, not simply to rejoice or wallow with the outcome of the Irish, but an opportunity to join a greater congregation across the country. The palette of conferences and regions that canvas the U.S. is a dazzling array of tradition and pageantry in the sports landscape. The experiential component at each school makes Saturdays an all-day affair that is much more than just 60 minutes of football between the lines. Gameday atmospheres combine campus pilgrimages, generations-old traditions and cheers, tailgate parties that transcend your typical get-togethers, young and old fans alike basking in the opportunity to celebrate the love affair each shares with the school and team.

If the games are the service that we attend to witness the drama unfold, then the stadiums are the cathedrals, standing monuments that open their doors to the ticketed masses. They come in all sizes, shapes, colors, and quirks. Some are built with the architectural intention to contain the cacaphony of clapping hands and cheering voices within its structure, giving rise to true home field advantage. There are few greater natural highs than walking through the gates of any stadium, sitting down and basking in the spectacle that surrounds you. The pomp and circumstance of the college game sets it apart from its corporate counterpart, the NFL. Student sections dominate the decibel readings, imploring the rest of the crowd to join them in the art of disrupting the visitors.

Thanks to Notre Dame's independence (which has been questioned on these pages), we have had the opportunity to visit various locales and enjoy other tradition rich schools. I conducted a poll among the We Is posse to compile a ranking of the stadiums we have been a part of. In fairness, only those stadiums at least two of us had been to were used for the ranking. This is an ongoing quest to travel to all parts of the land and join in as many traditions as we can. Just because your favorite stadium wasn't ranked doesn't mean it's not on our list of places to go.

A rundown on how the stadiums were scored. There were 6 categories to score a school, 1 - 10, 10 being the highest. I averaged the score of each category and added up the 6 averages to get an aggregate final score. The six categories:

Campus Vibe - basically a "cool" scale on what it's like to be at a given school - what's to like, or not like, about campus?

Fan Factor - pretty self-explanatory, but how passionate and loud are the fans? Also, are they welcoming or obnoxious to visitors? Educated or ignorant football fans? The people make the place, so how do they stack up?

Tailgate Scene - rising early to join the pre-game festivities and winding down after the game, some fanbases can write the book on tailgating;

Tradition - the goose bump factor: pre-game, during game, post-game; you know when you're a part of something bigger than the game, and it makes a difference;

Surrounding Area - the bar scene and direct area around campus that makes the preceding night and post-game fun to be around...or not around;

Intangibles - what happened on the trip that made it unique; this either makes you rehash the fond stories every time you're together, or you've pushed the awful memories into the farthest recesses of your mind;

Stay tuned for the countdown.........

Milligan Minute: SBPD, ISEP and Notre Dame

As I am sure you all know the Indiana State Excise Police with the help of the SBPD decided to raid a party and not issue tickets but to arrest the underage drinkers as some sort of a way of flexing their muscles. What is the sense of arresting underage kids as long as they are not a danger to themselves or the people around them?

From sources I have heard that there were students that blew less than .04 that were taken into custody. You can get that much amount of alcohol in you system just by breathing in the Ethanol laden air in South Bend.

I guess it is more important to the state of Indiana and South Bend to arrest Notre Dame student specifically athletes at a off campus house party than arrest the drug dealers on the west side or the people robbing ND students at gunpoint. This is a gross miscarriage of justice in South Bend.

What is the Universities role in this? One can only speculate that Notre Dame condoned these types of raids on their student body and that is sickening. This is just another way of Notre Dame reaching out and scolding its student body for trying to escape the bubble that is Notre Dame campus. If I recall correctly during my time at ND the Boat Club (the best bar ever) and Finnegan’s were raided on a Thursday. Why would you raid a bar on a Thursday? Hmmm? Could the bars have been raided on direction from Notre Dame in order to keep students from going out during the week? Was it because too many students were missing classes on Friday and there were drunken students roaming campus on a Weekday... Heaven forbid.

The Woman's and Men's lacrosse teams had members busted in this most recent raid and with the most media coverage two members of the Notre Dame Varsity Traveling Tackle Football Squad were caught up in this incident and may have their play careers ruined. I feel truly sorry for Will Yeatman for being caught up in this for a second time with in a year. Will keep your head up and hopefully things will work out for the best.

I cannot believe the ridiculousness of the Police in South Bend and the University. There are a few things all college students must learn... One is to see that they can survive on their own with out their parents. Another is to see if they can become a socially independent make friends and meet members of the opposite sex that they didn’t know from the time they were kids in grade school. The most important is to see if you drink alcohol and prove that you won’t die. Enter beer and liquor and most importantly welcome to college.

If you never took a drink before your 21st birthday feel free to cast stones at me and tell me I am going to hell and I will be happy to accept it. I had a beer before my 21st birthday, sue me...
In fact I had a beer in high school. Oh my god alert the authorities.
One of my favorite pastimes as a freshman was going to dorm parties On Campus and watching the freshmen introducing themselves to alcohol for the first time. These kids were laughable in their ineptness at handling booze. They were dancing, singing, slurring words and even talking to girls. I kid but it was fun to watch these future captains of industry learning to interact once they had some alcohol in them. It was like watching a newborn deer trying to walk and find its leg. They slip and fall and shake a little but soon they find out who they are and make their way in the world. The same happens to the baby deer. When you have your first sips of alcohol, you make a fool out of yourself (I am included in this) but you learn where your limits are and when to say when. Granted some people don’t ever find their limits but isn’t that part of growing up and maturing. You need to make mistakes to learn from. I am not saying the University should embrace underage drink but understand it is part of growing up and the college experience. They shouldn’t actively try to ruin the lives of ND students to prove there over bearing parenting points.

Notre Dame come into the 21st Century and get with the times and loosen up a little (the scary thing is this message is coming from a hard core conservative). Protect your students from armed robbery, rapes, and shootings and leave the underage drinking as an after thought.

There are so many more tragedies in this life than cracking an ice cold Budweiser on a warm fall evening and enjoying it with some of the best friends you will ever have. And sipping the chilly suds and talking about the times when you didn’t have a care in the world. Sitting in a chair on the porch and watching the world speed by. Actually I think I am going to do that right now... Enjoy a Great American Lager. The mind of Milligan has gone drinking.

Adios Yeatman

As if the running game needed more problems to sort out, the news that Will Yeatman, the best blocking TE on the roster, was cited for underage drinking Saturday night likely spells his doom at the university. Now the greenest of positions - tight end - just got a little greener. Freshman Kyle Rudolph, while looking capable as a receiving TE, doesn't have the beef or the experience to handle run blocking right now. With the preseason loss of sophomore Mike Ragone, the Irish are hurting in the TE department. Freshman Joseph Fauria will likely get reps now as the backup. In a couple years, TE depth will be a strength, but not now.

There's a lot to be upset about with this story. Knee-jerk reactions can blame the Indiana Excise police for spending their time cracking down on student parties. While this is the specific purpose of the Excise force, there's a growing debate on campus of focusing police efforts on protecting these same students from recent city violence. There's also the debate as to why Notre Dame's strict punishment toward its student-athletes makes other schools look like detention halls. I, for one, support the University in this regard. Invariably, athletes littering the top 25 schools get into mischief, usually much worse than underage drinking. These athletes are typically given a slap on the wrist punishment, like missing the first two games, which hardly affect the team when they're playing St. Copious of North Nebraska. Notre Dame holds its student-athletes to a different standard. They say it and they back it up. These athletes know the drill when they enroll. As unfortunate as it was to lose Kyle McAlarney for a basketball season, it taught him a significant life lesson and he returned with a renewed sense of desire and appreciation for the Notre Dame way.

But the most perplexing question is why a starter, on probation mind you, put himself in this bad situation? Ultimately, it's Yeatman's responsibility to make better decisions. Washing the bad taste of the Spartan loss out of his mouth with a few beers wouldn't have been a problem if he had stayed in his dorm or hit up a low-key gathering. But Yeatman showed poor judgment going to an off-campus party where the threat of police involvement is always prevalent.

Will, we hardly knew ye. Godspeed wherever you land. In the words of your namesake (sort of) William Butler Yeats:

"And weary and worn are our sad souls now"

Can we ever be LSU?

Jeremy, good thoughts on the game Saturday. I agree with you that Saturday was a step backward for the Irish after what appeared to be a breakthrough win over Michigan. We have a long way to go before we can start talking about being an elite team.

Before I get to the ND-MSU game, I wanted to toss in a few thoughts about that LSU-Auburn game. Maybe it was because it was the first SEC game I've watched all year, but the performances on the field in that game were jaw-dropping. Not only do they still have the great athleticism of the old SEC days, these teams are now just physically dominating along the lines, especially LSU. The teams of the SEC (we'll just include USC in that group) are playing a different sport than the rest of the college football world. It's incredible. LSU's front seven is absolutely ridiculous. They are bringing in waves of 8-9 defensive linemen, and every one of these guys would be the best player on our roster and probably the best player anywhere in the Midwest.

Here's my question for the ND fans. Even if we continue to mature and bring in these so-called top 5 recruiting classes, can we ever get to that level?? Like all ND fans, I've been following the recruiting and seeing us rack in these top 5 classes, but am I the only one who thinks that our talent level doesn't sniff what you see down at LSU or Auburn or Georgia or Florida?? I don't see one guy on our defensive roster outside of maybe Brian Smith (MAYBE) who would even be sniffing the field on any of those teams.

I don't care what the recruiting rankings are, we all have two eyeballs and can see that we don't have the big time players that other schools seem to have. How do they come up with these recruiting rankings anyway?? We are recruiting the 4.0 students, student body presidents, team captains, two parent family kids, and those kids probably get bumped up a bit in the recruiting rankings. EVERYONE ELSE is recruiting a different type of kid. The dirt poor linemen from rural Alabama, the inner city welfare kids, the Samoan islanders....guys who literally need football to have any future in life. We don't have even one of those kids on our entire roster, and I can't shake the feeling that those are the kids that we need to be big time. The hungry guys. We have GREAT all-around guys on our team who have a ton going for them in life and probably would be awesome to hang out with, but I'm not sure if that is really what would be best for our football team on the field. It's great for marketing and image, but not results. We have the talent to put together "nice" seasons like 2005 and 2006, but I don't see any Ricky Jean-Francois types on our roster.

LSU has kids from the Bayou who can't even read and would probably be dead or in prison if not for football. USC has these Samoan islander freaks that would be picking strawberries in the San Fernando Valley if it wasn't for football. If our kids don't make it in football, they go to law school or Wall Street. That's a good thing for our endowment fund and our US News ranking, but it is a problem for our football team. All I can think about was going out on Bourbon Street after the Sugar Bowl, and EVERY SINGLE GUY on LSU's team had the team issue clothes on out at the bars. EVERY GUY. Why?? I have no idea, but maybe it's because it's the only clothes they have. Our guys were wearing button downs, khakis, nice shoes. It's a great image for our team obviously, but our guys don't need football to dominate every part of their lives. That matters.

Anyway, the SEC is so far and away the best conference in America, it's not even funny. I don't care if the SEC champion has 2 losses this year. If the SEC champion isn't playing in the title game this year, it is not the title game. You cannot tell me that some Missouri-Penn State championship game would be legitimate if neither of those teams play anyone from the SEC. If you want to be considered the national champion, I think you have to go through the SEC.

Jeremy actually had an interesting idea for how to resolve the BCS and create a true national champion. What if college football used a championship belt system like they have in boxing?? Let's say you have three belts (one for the North, one for the South, and one for the West), and the only way for you to become the champion is to unify those belts and beat the other "titleholders." Instead of a playoff, the postseason could be a little round robin or something like that. That way, you can prevent the farce of a team winning a national title without playing anyone from the SEC. If you want to be the national champion, you have to take the "Southern" belt. I actually really like this idea maybe even more than a playoff (since a four team playoff could still leave out an SEC team in theory), and plus you would have the comedy of Ricky Jean-Francois coming out of the tunnel wearing a championship belt. Make it happen!!!

While we're here, I think I need to give credit where credit is due to Les Miles. At this point, there is no debate. He may come off like a bumpkin, but this guy is an outstanding head coach who gets his teams to play with incredible toughness and physicality. He is also maybe the gutsiest coach in college football today not named Pete Carroll. Does he have a ton of talent on his roster?? Absolutely, but talent alone does not win ballgames. He is now 8-3 against top 10 teams. That is remarkable. And they have won in some seriously hostile environments. While Saban laid the groundwork for that program, Miles has them rolling along. Based on how they play, I get the feeling that they must have some incredibly physical practices because they are easily the most physical team in the country. Their defense just explodes off the ball, and their offensive line mauls people. Color me impressed with LSU. If Jarrett Lee can come along a little bit, they are going to be really good this year. I used to hate Les Miles, but I'm actually coming around on him. The guy knows what he's doing, and they are fun to watch. I expect Verne and Gary to be making regular stops in Baton Rouge this year.

My top 5 through week 3:

1) USC
2) Florida
3) LSU
4) Alabama
5) Georgia

I'm in favor of starting the belt system now, so someone slap a belt on Pete Carroll and Urban Meyer. That "Southern" belt could change hands multiple times this year.

Let's get to the ND game:

Clausen - Not a whole lot to say about Jimmy Clausen that Jeremy has not already touched on. Clausen is really really good when he gets his feet set and has a place to go with the ball, but he gets himself into all kinds of trouble once he has to go through some progressions or improvise a little. I still think his issues are a product of youth, so hopefully he gets better with those reads as time goes along. There is a lot placed on his shoulders with this team, and he is essentially being asked to carry this team. How many other TRUE sophomore quarterbacks are in that position?? None. When you are putting everything in his hands, there are going to be some great plays and some shaky plays. That's just the nature of the beast. He throws that sideline out route as well as anyone in the country, but it would be nice to see him work the middle of the field to the tight end and maybe hit some crossing patterns. Hopefully he gets more comfortable in the pocket as the season goes along because those plays where he turns backwards for 6 yards and hurls it away at the first sign of a rush are killing us with intentional grounding penalties and near interceptions.

Hughes/Allen/the running game - While I will be the first to say that I am disappointed to see how finesse our o-line is in Weis' fourth year, I can live with the lack of a running game if we would just commit to some type of offense. Our offense has absolutely no identity. We seem to come out with a game plan, and then immediately scrap it when the going gets tough and start grab bagging out of the hurry up. We are now in the fourth year of the Weis offense, and I still have no idea what type of offense he wants to build here. He talks about wanting to run the ball, but it's obvious that our o-line hasn't worked on becoming a power running team that can play smashmouth. We will come out trying to run the ball, and it just leads to one stonewall run after another. There's no attempt at a misdirection run or anything to move the ball on the ground. It's almost like Weis decides in the middle of the 2nd quarter every game "well, we tried to run the ball, screw it, five wide!!"

It seems like almost every big game since 2006 Michigan has played out the same way. Completely inept for the first 25 or so minutes of the game on offense, and then we go to the hurry up at the end of the half and start moving the ball through the air. Then we do the same thing in the second half.

At this point, why not just come out in the 5 wides and see if we can jump on our opponent early through the air?? Would it really hurt to try it?? We have a top flight quarterback who can make all the throws, our receivers are as good as any young receivers in the country, and our o-line is built to pass block. Do I like that type of offense?? No, not particularly. Do I think we can beat USC or a big time SEC team with a one dimensional offense like that?? No, probably not because there is such a thin margin for error when you are always having to execute through the air and a good team will make us pay for being one-dimensional. But I do think it is our best way to move the football this year. At the very least, our guys at least seem to play with confidence when we run the Texas Tech no back hurry up passing offense. They seem to believe in it, and we do move the football down the field in that offense. I don't like the idea of becoming the Texas Tech of the Midwest more than anyone else, but I also don't want to see this team blow games that we should be winning.

Hopefully Robert Hughes and Cierre Wood are not reading this post because that offense obviously would not lead to a whole lot of carries for those guys. However, I think you have to play to your strengths. For all his bluster about the running game, Weis is most comfortable calling an offense that flings it around the field. He likes to call plays that set up one on one matchups for his receivers, and it actually has worked in stretches. If we committed to running it in practice and came out with that offense in the game, maybe we could really do some damage offensively.

Tight ends - Well, a unit that had been dormant through two games suddenly showed some life on Saturday. Definitely a good sign. Kyle Rudolph was open over the middle of the field quite a bit, and I would not be surprised to see us using that part of our offense again soon. The tight end over the middle was one of our bread and butter plays in the first couple years, so it would be nice to see Rudolph making some plays in the passing game. Not to make excuses for this team, but the tight end position is a perfect example of the extreme youth on this roster. Kyle Rudolph is a true freshmen who had no idea what he was doing in the first couple games, but now he is getting more comfortable and could be on his way to being a productive player as soon as this year.

Michael Floyd - Good god, a star is born. My gut feeling before this game was that Michael Floyd was about to become a household name in the very near future, but I did not expect him to break out like that just yet. Floyd is going to be a superstar in this offense. There is no one in the Big 10 or Big East (which comprises most of our schedule in upcoming years) who can guard him one on one. Floyd is such a smooth player and already looks like a guy who has the polish of a junior or senior. Very excited about Michael Floyd. His performance on Saturday confirms what we already knew. He is going to be a great player at ND.

Golden Tate/other receivers - It wouldn't be a 2008 ND game without mentioning the remarkable transformation of Golden Tate. While MSU made a concerted effort to try to shut him down and kick away from him, Tate still made his mark on this game with that incredible catch in traffic on the floater from Clausen (that easily could have been picked off), a great run on a reverse, and that remarkable effort to break tackles and convert that long 3rd down play late in the game. Tate is a warrior, and we need more guys like him. He refuses to be denied out there, and I love that attitude.

Where was David Grimes in this game?? Was he hurt?? I didn't see him out there much. Robbie Parris is a very underwhelming player if you ask me. The only play we run for him now is that bubble screen, which hasn't worked yet this year. I don't know what to expect out of Parris. He doesn't make any plays.

As for Duval Kamara, I think he is officially on the bench at this point. While the first interception was not his fault (not a good decision by Clausen to throw into double coverage like that), I think the second one might have been on him. Kamara didn't fight to get open, and let his man beat him to the ball. It was especially disheartening because Michael Floyd probably would have found a way to catch that ball.

Defensive line - Did anyone else notice that every big run Javon Ringer had on Saturday seemed to be to the left side of the line?? I'm not going to say too much, but I will note that John Ryan is our right defensive end. I think it's time to put Ethan Johnson in there as our starting right defensive end. We actually have been using him down on the goal line, and he is a pretty effective runstuffer. Why not put this guy in during other situations?? He is clearly a more talented player than John Ryan. The best players need to be on the field. I don't think it will be long before Ethan Johnson is starting over Ryan.

As for the rest of the d-line, I actually thought we played ok up front. Ringer had some big runs, but we also stopped him quite a few times. The only way to get better up front is to start mixing in those freshmen more and more. I don't think we will ever have LSU's personnel up front, but we can certainly get much better.

Linebackers - Brian Freaking Smith. WOW. Another great ballgame for this guy. What I like about Brian Smith is that he makes most of his big plays behind the line of scrimmage. He's not a Lauranaitis type who makes all his plays after the ballcarrier is 5 yards down the field. Smith has a knack for knifing into the backfield and blowing up a play. He has the athleticism to get to the sideline and cut off the running lanes against anyone. Couldn't be more excited about #58's future. He has a chance to be an all-time great at ND.

As for the rest of the linebackers, maybe I am in the minority, but I'm not in love with the idea of Harrison Smith as a linebacker. I think the guy has some ability, but he is too small to be a great linebacker. I just don't see it with this guy. I'd rather move him back to safety and groom him to take over for David Bruton after next year. I've watched him get beat in pass coverage, and he doesn't have the size to explode into the pile and mix it up at the line of scrimmage.

Corners - I agree wholeheartedly with Jeremy about Terrail Lambert. Every time MSU needed a big 3rd down conversion, they threw at Lambert. He is not a good cover guy, and I really think we need to explore a change at that position to get Gary Gray in there. Gray has more "material" than Lambert. It's a simple fact. Lambert plays hard and is actually decent in run support, but he is the last of the old ND corner recruits and doesn't have the abilities to be a lockdown corner. Gray, McNeil, and even Blanton have more raw talent than Lambert, and I'd like to see all those guys on the field together more.

Safeties - Another great day for Kyle McCarthy. It seemed like he was all over the field again, and I think he's the frontrunner for the most improved player award on the defense.

Overall, I thought the defense played pretty well. We still need to get better up front, but I think we are more fundamentally sound and also more aggressive. Those two attributes will eventually pay off.

Special Teams - Nothing more to say that hasn't been said, but it really does amaze me that we can't find a good kicker. You would think ND would be to the kicker what USC is to quarterbacks. We are made for a good kicker. White guys, good students, Catholic schools. How do not have some plucky little guy who grew up belting kicks for some state championship team in the Midwest and now is living out the dream at ND?? Just seems like ND fits the demographic to be Kicker U, and yet we've had a bad placekicking team for about 12 out of the last 14 years.

Same goes for kickoffs. We watched the MSU kicker boom a kickoff through the uprights on Saturday. THROUGH IT!! Our kickers are barely getting it to the 10. Just a killer in the field position game. Michigan freaking State has a better kicking game than us. How is that possible??

Michigan State - Since we're discussing the game, I wanted to say a couple things about Michigan State. First of all, I like what Mark Dantonio is doing there. He came to that school, and immediately tried to establish an identity. They decided to hang their hat on a sound running game with good blocking up front, an attacking defense, and good special teams. While they are still a work in progress to some degree, they at least have a foundation that they can build upon.

Ringer is obviously a special player, and I thought their o-line played fairly well. It sounds like their o-line is just as young as ours, so that could be a real good unit over the next couple years. Their receivers were pretty athletic, but you could tell that they don't have a lot of experience. They had some bad drops.

As for Hoyer, I thought he played pretty poorly against us. He missed a lot of open receivers, and it doesn't seem like the fans have a whole lot of confidence in him. Hoyer has been an ok placeholder for MSU, but it sounds like the fans are ready to embrace the Oklahoma transfer or someone else within that program.

Their schedule is actually fairly favorable this year, so they may be able to sneak out 8-9 wins this year. I think they will be 6-1 with the Buckeyes coming into town. Could be interesting. I think they have a shot to finish anywhere from 3-5 in the Big 10 this year, which would be a good year for them.

The scary part about MSU is that they are probably just scratching the surface of their potential as a program under Dantonio. They have a highly regarded transfer QB coming in from Oklahoma, they've brought in a couple good RB recruits, and their o-line is actually fairly young. I think the future is fairly bright in East Lansing.

East Lansing/Spartan Stadium - Nothing but good things to say about the experience up in East Lansing this weekend. It is a first class university in a good college town with good fans and a good stadium. Their student section was rocking most of the day, and the crowd was pretty fired up with the "Whiteout" planned for the game. MSU's band is pretty darn good (although not as good as the incredible outfit that Dr. Kenneth Dye continues to put together year after year), and some of their songs are still ringing in my head.

While I have expressed interest in occasionally taking a break from MSU and Purdue, I'm revising my stance just a bit. I think MSU should be a permanent fixture on the schedule. It's a good little rivalry, they almost always have a competitive team, and we have had a history of great games with them. MSU has the potential to be one of the 3-4 best programs in the Big 10, and any win over them is always respectable.

On the other hand, a break with Purdue is long overdue. Purdue is barely staying afloat as a program, and I think they are in for some real hard times after Tiller leaves. At best, they are the 6th or 7th best program in the Big 10. Purdue just doesn't have the access to talent that you need. They are getting the 3rd tier players in the state of Indiana, which isn't even that great for high school football in the first place. If we are looking to move/drop one of those Big 10 teams, I would be all for dropping Purdue and using their spot for a decent home and home with an SEC/ACC team like Clemson or South Carolina or Arkansas. Heck, even Ole Miss would be more intriguing than Purdue.

Charlie Weis - Predictably, Weis is taking a lot of heat for this loss, and I think some of it is warranted. We clearly have a lot more talent than Michigan State, but our talent is still a long way from forming into a championship team. As Jeremy noted, our offense consists of Clausen firing and our receivers making great individual plays. There is no method to our offense. The only time we move the ball is when we go into helter skelter desperation mode. That is probably not a long term model for success unless we commit to making that our actual offense.

Michigan State is a nice team, but hardly a great team by any stretch. While I had that game down as a loss before the season, it turned out that it was a winnable game. They are a slightly above average team with a deeply flawed QB and a defense that Cal torched in week one, and yet they completely dominated us up front, and outplayed us in all three phases of the game.

Our special teams are better, but still not at a championship level. Our defense is better, but MSU and Michigan have gashed us for yards. Can't even imagine what a really good offense would do to us.

What are we building toward?? Are we headed toward championship level play over the next couple years or is our ceiling as a program going to be a lot like the 2006 type teams that can put up big stats against Purdue but gets blown out by the big boys?? I really am not sure at this point. I guess we'll find out over the next few years.

The good news for Weis is that the young talent we have on this roster appears to be outstanding in some areas (WR, TE, corner, QB), and the players are playing hard for him. This team does not give up, and I like the swagger of the younger players. I am not giving up on Weis by any stretch, and I hope we continue to improve over the course of the season. With the schedule we have, there are still a ton of winnable games. Heck, every one of these games until USC is a winnable game.

Are we capable of someday being in the same class as LSU?? Not sure, but we sure as heck have better players than just about everyone on our schedules coming up the next few years. While I am not a fan of playing a weak schedule, there are certainly plenty of opportunities to win a bunch of games.

Our goal as a program should be to at least capture the "Northern" belt in the next couple years, and then we'll see what happens from there.

The Good, The Bad, The Ugly - Week 3 (Michigan St.)

While the final result of this week's game may not have been all that surprising, Irish fans have to feel disappointed with the overall effort. Its difficult to expect a young team to play well on the road against a good team like MSU, but ND was clearly dominated in every aspect of this game. Much of the goodwill earned from the big win over Michigan was quickly dashed by Javon Ringer and Sparty. Unfortunately, it appears this may be the story of 2008 - two steps forward, one step back. But anyone watching that game yesterday knows that the Irish are very, very far from being "back."

OFFENSE

The Good

Some very good and promising individual performances:

Clausen looked good at times, running the two-minute offense fairly effectively. He continues to throw the quick and even the deep out to the sideline very well, and mixed in some nice deep balls once again. As will be noted below, the TE and the middle of the field made a reappearance in the passing game, which bodes well for the future.

Kyle Rudolph - welcome to the offense. 2 nice catches, including a beautiful 18-yarder over the middle. Hopefully Clausen will continue to look his way as that pattern has almost always been open in the Weis offense.

Floyd has become the best receiver on the team. 7 catches, 86 yards, including a highlight reel TD in the 4th quarter to keep the Irish in the game. The amount of talent in this year's NCAA freshman WR class is amazing - Julio Jones are AJ Green are becoming SEC household names. Floyd isn't far behind and already looks like he's Clausen's favorite target 3 games into his 1st year.

Golden Tate had another impressive game - 5 catches for 83 yards and a nice end-around for the longest rush of the day. MSU had clearly marked him and kicked away all day long.

The Bad

When you're a young team playing on the road against a solid team, the key is to avoid turnovers and make sure to put points on the board at every opportunity. ND failed miserably in this aspect of the game. The Irish were on the MSU 24 for the first turnover (Clausen's INT in the end zone) and very clearly squandered a likely scoring opportunity. The second turnover (and Clausen's 2nd INT) gave MSU a short field and led to the first TD of the game. The final turnover (Floyd's fumble)occurred on the MSU 14, again squandering a golden opportunity. The Irish had two other good scoring opportunities that resulted in missed FGs. Those are killer turnovers and killer missed opportunities. Although the Irish were definitely dominated in most aspects of this game, had they turned a few of those opportunities into scores, it could have been a much different game.

Clausen is still going through some growing pains - he's erratic at times and hasn't yet figured out how to deal with the pressure. He stepped up nicely in the face of the rush late in the 4th quarter, but for much of the game looked very awkward when MSU brought some heat. The first INT looked like a bad choice - throwing into double coverage in the end zone. The second INT may have been on Kamara. The fact that Duval didn't get back on the field until the end of the game would lead me to think that Kamara didn't interpret the comeback route and didn't adequately fight for the ball. If ND is unable to get any production out of Kamara, it could be a long year.

Doug made a great point during the game this weekend - right now our offense consists of a bunch of guys making individual plays. To use a (perhaps) poor hoops example, ND has turned into the Van Gundy era Knicks - throwing the ball into the post and hoping Spree or Houston could make a play. There really isn't much flow to the offense at all. Its one-dimensional right now with the goal seeming to be get the ball into Tate or Floyd's hands and have them see if they can beat the opposition's defensive backs. This could be successful against the San Diego St's and Navy's of the world, but as ND showed yesterday, even an upper-tier Big Ten team can keep the Irish under wraps.

The Ugly

This one should be obvious to anyone with a pulse. The complete and utter lack of a running game has to be the most disappointing part of the season thus far. In their preseason previews, BGS ranked MSU's defensive line as the 7th best on our schedule, having replaced several starters from last year's team. The two longest runs of the day came on an end around by Tate and a draw on 3rd and very, very long. The rest was an abomination.

I understand that the Weis offensive mentality basically uses the running game as window dressing, but at this point, the offense can only move the ball by going to a 5-wide shotgun look. We've become a poor man's version of Texas Tech, counting on short passing to move the ball down the field and often requiring penalties and help from the opposition to get into scoring position. We're back to 2006 - very little margin for error and often having to convert a 3rd and long to keep possession. Just really doesn't bode well for the rest of the year.

Which brings us to what seems to be a long-standing problem that isn't going away. Our offensive line is stock full of 4-star guys with impressive offer lists, but they can't mvoe anybody. Our running plays seem to be slow developing and not opening any holes at all against teams with subpar run defenses. I know plenty of Irish fans would love to see the 250+ yards rushing a game that was prevalent throughout the Holtz regime, but let's be honest here - Joe Moore isn't walking through that door. Some have thrown out Glen Mason's name as a Tenuta-type band-aid for the run game and offensive line. I have no idea what's wrong with this aspect of the team - the talent is clearly there, the coach (Latina) is a guy with a history of success at other locations and even some experience with Moore and Holtz. But the bottom line is this - ND can never return to the top of the college football game without a rushing offense. If Weis wants to use the pass to set up the run, fine. But abandoning the run game completely, especially when guys like Hughes are back there (and guys like Wood and Riddick on the way) cannot be an option.

DEFENSE

The Good

Some big plays and stops behind the line kept the Irish in the game until the 4th quarter. The 2 stops in the red zone were impressive and gave the offense a chance to answer. A few of the young'uns got some crunch-time PT in big spots - including Robert Blanton. This experience will be invaluable as Weis will definitely float or drown over the next few years on the shoulders of this freshman class.

The Bad

MSU seemingly had one play in their passing playbook. But it worked almost every time. ND could not take away the slant and Sparty converted some back-breaking 3rd downs to keep the chains moving. Hoyer wasn't particularly impressive, but his WRs didn't help him either. By my count, there were at least 3 clear drops by MSU receivers that would have converted 1st downs and resulted in large gains.

Another game, another QB standing upright for the entire game. The blitzing again failed to hit home, and Hoyer wasn't really significantly pressured. The 4-man rush was almost laughable. Hoyer could have had a freakin cup of tea in the backfield without a gold helmet touching him.

With the amount of good young talent kicking around the secondary right now, I'm having a tough time seeing the justification for Lambert's continued playing time.

The Ugly

Javon Ringer - 39 rushes, 201 yards, 2 TDs. Everyone in Spartan Stadium knew what was coming and ND couldn't stop it. Take away the 60-yarder late in the 4th quarter and the stats don't look so ugly. But MSU clearly controlled the line of scrimmage, and ND was left fairly helpless.

This brings us to another long-standing problem. The elite teams and defenses in college football (see: USC, LSU) have monster run-stuffing DTs all over the roster that they can rotate in and out to keep everyone fresh. ND just doesn't have these guys right now. Ian Williams looks promising, and this year's freshman class includes several guys who will likely be making contributions in the future - Brandon Newman, Sean Cwynar and Hafis Williams. Kapron Lewis-Moore could be put in this group as well. One more will be joining the fold in the '09 class (Tyler Stockton from NJ). The likelihood of another recruit from the '09 class on the D-line appears unlikely at this time. The chances that all of these guys make immediate and significant contributions to the run defense next year seems unlikely. Its tough to envision this aspect of the defense getting much better in the near future.

SPECIAL TEAMS

The Good

I got nothin.

The Bad

After ND scored in the 4th quarter, Burkhardt's kick barely reached the 15, and a fortunate arm tackle was the only thing standing in the way of a huge return for Sparty. MSU still had the ball on their 40 yard line, and the ensuing drive that led to an MSU field goal took away much of ND's momentum and made it a 2-score game again. The fact that Notre Dame is unable to find anyone who can consistently kick the ball even TO the goaline really speaks volumes about the state of ND football right now. Weis should hold open tryouts and invite anyone on campus to tryout to see if there's someone on campus that can get the ball to the end zone.

The Ugly

I know kicking 40+ yard field goals is no easy feat. But ND's FG kicking game is downright miserable. ND has not had a reliable option at kicker since Nick Setta had his mysterious injury in 2003 that kept him out for the last half of the season. Next year Nick Tausch will be coming to campus, making him the 3rd scholarship kicker on the team. We here at We Is are not in the business of calling out or demeaning individual players too often, but this is simply unacceptable.

COACHING

It was all ugly. And should this "laptop" issue start making the rounds, I'm quite frightened of the potential response from Weis. I can't see any situation in which he handles that well.

BUCKEYES

OFFENSE - MICHAEL FLOYD. The fumble notwithstanding, he had a great day and was the best player on the field.

DEFENSE - BRIAN SMITH. Had some very disruptive plays in the MSU backfield. McCarthy and Harrison Smith played pretty well also.

SPECIAL TEAMS - PASS. Ugh.

PREDICTIONS

SHORT TERM: Weis and Haywood open 5-wide from the gun next week and attempt fewer than 10 rushes in the first half.

LONG TERM: Michael Floyd breaks every major receiving record at ND.

It May Be Football Season, But...

Once the calendar flips into September, Bud Selig and MLB inevitably succumb to step-child status in the sports world firmament. The former national pasttime carries stick & ball (and fantasy baseball) fans like a rented mule through the summer doldrums. And what does MLB get for its efforts as it wraps up its marathonian season? Sweet little Hank Williams Jr. getting everyone ready for some football. It's impossible not to get swept up in the early college and pro storylines, especially when ESPN and its middling media partners bludgeon us to death with a 4:1 (and that's generous) football to baseball ratio in coverage.

I'll readily admit to ravenously consuming all things football while simply scoreboard watching in baseball. Football season gives us all an excuse to channel our inner-undergrad, even if your arm now gets sore from slinging the pigskin and you can't shotgun like you used to. But watching Baseball Tonight last night - yes, it's still on with the venerable Karl Ravech - I realized that there's plenty of gripping drama that's all been buried by football. Even though my fantasy squad, appropriately named Underachieving, fell short of the playoffs, reasons abound to be 2-sport viewers right now, the Bo Jackson of armchair remote handlers. A short handicap on how I think things will shakedown.

NL West

At least the winner of the worst division in baseball will have a winning record. The Diamondbacks strong pitching has faded, while the Dodgers did what most Los Angeleans (Los-Angelese? I haven't a clue what's the correct nomenclature) do in times of need - makeover. Enter Manny Ramirez, who's added enough pop to lead the Dodgers surge to the division crown. Come playoffs, I would imagine he'll get the Bonds treatment, routinely walked without hesitation to let a cast of no-names keep them playing in October. I don't see it happening.

NL Central

The Cubs got exactly the boost they needed with Carlos Zambrano returning from his injury with a no-hitter. If the pitchers hold up, they are certainly the favorites to make the World Series and put 100 years of heartbreak and disappointment behind them. The plucky Astros somehow crawled back into the wild card race with their impersonation as the '07 Rockies. The hot team has certainly made waves in the NL the last three years, amde easier this year when the other contenders are folding like lawnchairs. The Brewers meltdown is curious, and firing their manager with two weeks left is even more curious. Though I think the Brewers' sum of their parts is better than Houston, the confusion caused by the move will work against them in the clubhouse. Playoff baseball is all about chemistry.

NL East

Gotta love the Mets knack for end of season collapses. When they lose, they curl up like a roly-poly and lay down to anyone, including the worst team in the NL in back-to-back contests. The Phillies have mojo on their side and should ride it to another division title. Ryan Howard has clubbed his way into the MVP discussion with his late-game long ball heroics. Has there been an MVP with a comparable lowly .249 batting average? I like the Phillies to hold onto the division lead and giving the Cubs their stiffest competition.

As for the Wild Card, the Mets lead the Brewers by 1/2 a game with the Astros 3 games back. Looking at each team's remaining schedule and potential "ace" starts, it's going to come down to the wire.

NEW YORK: 2 @ WAS; 3 @ ATL; 4 CHI; 3 FLA --- 3 probable Santana starts

MILWAUKEE: 2 @ CHI; 3 @ CIN; 3 PIT; 3 CHI --- 5 probable CC/Sheets starts

HOUSTON: 2 @ FLA; 3 @ PIT; 3 CIN; 3 ATL --- 2 probable Oswalt starts

Though the Astros schedule looks the easiest, they still have ground to make up and don't have the horses in the pitching stable like the other two. The Brewers have 5 with the best team in the NL at the same time they are answering too many questions in their own clubhouse. As bad as the Mets have looked, I think they'll come away with the Wild Card. Santana's big game experience will pay dividends. Those four games with the Cubs will likely be a prelude to a first round matchup in Wrigley Field.

AL West

The Angels wrapped this puppy up during the NBA season. The only question is whether the lack of pressure-packed games will prepare them adequately for October baseball. It's kind of tough to turn it on and off, but I truly believe the Angels have the most talent both in hitting and pitching in the AL. Mike Sciosia might be the best manager in the game and K-Rod is unquestionably the best closer in the game - two requisites to win the World Series.

AL Central

What has befallen my beloved Twins? Their calling card over the years has been a lights out bullpen, which has become their Achilles heel in the last few weeks. Joe Nathan has uncharacteristically blown a handful of saves. Each loss more devastating as the White Sox are starting to pull away with a 2.5 game lead. The White Sox have weathered injuries and are benefiting from their power hitting lineup. Since the wild card is coming out of the East, these two are clawing for one spot. Their remaining schedules:

CHICAGO: 2 @ NYY; 3 @ KC; 3 @ MIN; 3 CLE

MINNESOTA: 1 @ CLE; 4 @ TB; 3 CHI; 3 KC

As long as the Twins are within 2 games when they square off in the Metrodome, they have a fighter's chance. I'm very worried about the Tampa Bay series (that sentence has never been written or uttered before). They'll need to at least split to keep pace. I'm withholding a prediction until that pivotal series, at which point you'll hear from me again.

AL East

Bar none the best story in baseball. The Tampa Bay Rays are as likeable a team as you can find. How can you not root for them, especially now that they've adopted the team mohawk, skipper Joe Maddon included! I'm ecstatic that they've guaranteed themselves a spot in the playoffs. We might have to get used to this Tampa Bay playoff phenomenon since they have one of the youngest teams in baseball. The fact that they're still battling the defending champ Red Sox for the division title implies that they may not be a flash in the pan - think Florida Marlins in '97. I think the Rays outduel the BoSox for the division and depending how they respond to the pressure of the postseason, have a great chance of making waves in the playoffs. The Red Sox as a wild card team would have a huge chip on their shoulder and would be the last team the Angels would want to play. What a fantastic matchup that would be!

Week 4: The Picks

Week three was a huge statement week in college football, and now we turn our attention in the college football world back to the Southeastern Conference. With Georgia heading out west for their first big test of the year and two absolutely huge SEC conference games (Florida-Tennessee and Auburn-LSU), it is going to be an exciting weekend south of the Mason-Dixon line. Always great to discuss some War Eagle for the first time all year. Of course, the Irish are headed up to East Lansing for a big showdown with the Spartans.

Let's get to the picks:

Wednesday September 17, 2008

Kansas State -3.5 at Louisville (ESPN2 8:00 pm) -

Dan: Kansas State -3.5

Kansas State has looked like the late 90s teams that had Bill Snyder roaming the sideline with the Wildcat offense running up the points on the opposition in the first two weeks. Of course, that's because they were, like most of the 90s, playing vastly inferior opponents. However, I’m not sold on a team that lost 27 – 2 at home to the other Wildcats team (UK). I like Brandon Banks to have a big game at WR for K-State and for Louisville to move to 0 – 2 against Wildcats this year.

Kansas State 24 Louisville 17

Matt: Louisville +3.5

I don’t think I’ve had less of a feel for a game all year. Talk about two programs headed in the wrong direction. This year, Kansas State has beaten up on two high school teams, while Louisville got thoroughly embarrassed by UK in their only real game. I’ll take the home team and I could not feel less confident about it.

Mike: Kansas State (-3.5)

It is remarkable how quickly Louisville has declined under Steve Kragthorpe. In a nightmare opener against Kentucky, the offensive line for the Cardinals could not open any holes for the running game and the depleted receiving corps failed to create any separation for QB Hunter Cantwell. In addition, Cantwell missed several open throws on the few plays where receivers were actually open. While the early returns on Louisville have not been good, Kansas State remains a total mystery this year because the Wildcats have not played any real competition yet. As a means of overcoming KSU’s myriad recruiting shortcomings, such as lack of tradition and poor location, coach Ron Prince has adopted the “scorched earth policy” pioneered by Dennis Erickson, which consists of stocking the roster with a staggering number of junior college transfers in an apparent attempt to win quickly and subsequently flee the scene before the NCAA sanctions are handed down. Louisville certainly has the ability to beat the JUCO-laden Wildcats in this Wednesday night game, but I will need more proof before I ever bet another dime on Kragthorpe and Co.

Kansas State 31 Louisville 17

Doug: Kansas State -3.5

I would like to pick Louisville here, but Louisville stinks this year. Ron Prince is in his 3rd year, they are off to a good start with a bunch of JUCOs leading this team, and now is the time for KSU to make a statement.

Your week 3 Big East update - Rutgers gets plowed at home by UNC and Syracuse took a beating for the ages to Penn State, but credit to South Florida for pulling that game out against Kansas. They are officially carrying the banner for the Big East at this point.

Kansas State 30 Louisville 24

Thursday September 18, 2008

West Virginia -3 at Colorado (ESPN 8:30 pm) -

Dan: West Virginia -3

Everyone is well aware of the debacle for the Mountaineers two weeks ago at East Carolina. Dan Hawkins has Colorado at 2 – 0 including an impressive win over in state rival Colorado State. Nevertheless, I think Hawkins is a couple years away from having Colorado competing for its division in the Big 12, let alone beating a talented team like West Virginia. Meanwhile, Pat White and YouTube superstar Noel Devine will have something to prove this week. While I do think that the 3 years from now WVU will be in the poor house without RichRod, they have enough talent to compete for the weak Big East title this year and to beat Colorado by more than 3 points this week. On a side note, I think WVU does deserve some props for going on the road to play ECU, Colorado, and taking on Auburn at home for their out of conference schedule.

West Virginia 28 Colorado 17

Matt: West Virginia -3

Where was I when West Virginia suddenly turned into the “Anytime, Anywhere” Mountaineers. They’re going on the road to East Carolina, now they’re going to Boulder on a Thursday night. I like the philosophy, although the post-Slaton/Rodriguez year might not be the year to prove a point. Nevertheless, I like the ‘Neers in this one. I think Pat White has a big game, although I do think Dan Hawkins has Colorado on the right track. Give him one more year and they’ll be competing for a Big 12 North title. Remember this name folks – Darrell Scott. How the hell did Bobby Bowden let him out of Tallahassee. Does Bobby still know that he is the coach of Florida State at this point?

Mike: Colorado (+3)

In a compelling Thursday night game, the already embattled Bill Stewart hopes to placate the West Virginia fan base with a big road win at Folsom Field. Neither team played last week in anticipation of this mid-week showdown, so the Mountaineers presumably still have the bad taste of their East Carolina beatdown in their mouths. During said beatdown, Skip Holtz’s Pirates followed the time honored blueprint for defeating West Virginia: load up against the run and force Pat White to beat you by throwing. Colorado, which has plenty of experience against wide-open spread offenses by virtue of its inclusion in the Big XII conference, should slow down White and Noel Devine enough to provide its offense with a chance to win the game. The CU offense will take advantage of this opportunity with a balanced attack behind RB Darrell Scott and QB Cody Hawkins, thereby earning a big home victory against another staggering Big East program.
CU 34 West Virginia 24

Doug: Colorado +3

Thursday night football is back in the state of Colorado! Dan Hawkins is no Sonny Lubick (the godfather of Thursday Night Football), but you have to think a little of that Thursday night magic might rub off on him. This game is huge for Colorado and their fans, so I'm expecting a great crowd on Thursday night. I could be totally wrong about this game, but I just feel like West Virginia is headed downhill. Not only am I concerned about their coaching situation, I think they might be suffering from a little Senioritis. It seems like a lot of these teams with a bunch of seniors who have been around awhile get complacent in their senior years. We saw this last year with Michigan, and Ohio State has it a little this year.

Colorado needs this win to put itself on the map, their strength on defense is in stopping the run, and I think they are gearing up to ambush the Mountaineers.

Colorado 35 West Virginia 31

Saturday September 20, 2008

Alabama -9 at Arkansas (Raycom 12:30pm) -

Dan: Alabama -9

Another SEC home underdog and me taking another road favorite. However, just like I took Texas against the Razorbacks last week (pre-postponement) I’ll pick against them this week. The Arkansas Razorbacks really miss the underappreciated (and slightly crazy) Houston Nutt. I’m sure Petrino will have them competitive in a year or two, but in the mean time, the 17 Razorback fans are in for a long year.

Alabama 33 Arkansas 17

Matt: Arkansas +9

Nothing Arkansas has done suggests this should be a close game. Just a gut feeling. Alabama is a little young to be winning by double digits on the road in the SEC. By the way, thank God the ‘preseason’ is over. This SEC season is going to be incredible. It’s just nice not to look at the weekly lineup and see LSU-North Texas or Alabama-Tulane.

Mike: Alabama -9

Even though Arkansas has barely squeaked by two terrible opponents in its first two games, there are plenty of reasons why they might cover this game: the game is in Fayetteville, the Hogs should show continued growth as they obtain a better grasp of Petrino’s schemes and the line is rather large for a series that has been traditionally close. Despite these factors, I expect Alabama to earn the cover by controlling the lines of scrimmage.

Alabama 28 Arkansas 14

Doug: Arkansas +9

I'm as big of a believer in Nick Saban as anyone, but anytime I see a home underdog in the SEC, I'm inclined to take the points. Arkansas has had all weekend to start getting prepared for this game, and I'm expecting an inspired performance. I think Bama will win, but I'll take the nine points.

Alabama has Georgia next week, so they might be caught looking ahead and find themselves in a ballgame. I think Alabama has a very real chance to win the SEC this year, but nine points seems like too much here for me.

By the way, if Phil Fulmer gets run out of town as expected, how much would Tennessee have loved to go after Bobby Petrino in the offseason?? It's crazy how important timing is in the coaching world. The same thing applied to the Les Miles situation last year. If LSU hadn't made the national title or if Lloyd Carr had packed it in two years ago instead of after last season, I think Les Miles would be starting his first or second season in Ann Arbor this year.

Iowa +1 at Pittsburgh (ESPN2 12pm) -

Dan: Pittsburgh - 1

This game holds about as much interest for me as women’s curling. Pittsburgh was once again overrated (shocking). The Hawkeyes are actually off to a nice 3 – 0 start, but I’m not believing in them until they show me something against some decent opponents. Pitt lost at home to BGSU followed by a relatively unconvincing win over Buffalo. However, in an effective pick-em, I am going to go out on a limb and take the home team. LeSean McCoy gets going early and Pittsburgh uses ball control to win a close one.

Pittsburgh 20 Iowa 17

Matt: Iowa +1

Moving on…

Mike: Iowa +1

After a brief respite, the calls for Dave Wannstedt’s job will grow louder following this weekend’s game at Heinz Field. Iowa, despite its ongoing quarterback problems, will run the ball effectively and slow down Shady McCoy, while Pitt will make its usual panoply of mistakes. Is Johnny Majors still available?

Iowa 23 Pittsburgh 17

Doug: Iowa +1

Wow, huge swing game for both teams. You could argue that it's a program-defining game in many ways (don't laugh). Just call it the "We're not all that high on our head coaches but not ready to give up on them just yet" bowl. Two fairly evenly matched teams, similar talent levels, coaches on the hot seat (or at least a little warm), and both programs desperate for a winning season that can give them a little momentum.

It comes down to two question for me. Who needs this game more and which of these coaches is going to have their team more ready to play?? I think it's Iowa. Iowa needs this win for its coach, its fans, and the entire state. While you could make the same case for Pitt, I think there is more desperation for Iowa to make a statement. Ferentz has been struggling, but I trust him to get his team to rise to the occasion more than Wannstedt. Wannstedt is a dead man walking if you ask me.

Iowa 24 Pitt 10

Miami (FL) -3.5 at Texas A&M (ABC 3:30 pm) -

Dan: Miami -3.5

Can Miami regroup after the disaster two weeks ago in the Swamp? Can Mike Sherman right the ship in College Station after the disarray left by the slimy Dennis Franchione? Both teams have some injury concerns. The Aggies’ QB McGee has a sprained shoulder while Miami RB Javarris James sprained his ankle and may miss the game as well. I think Miami’s strong and, as of yet, un-jaded freshman class helps them bounce back after the disheartening loss. After all, the Aggies lost at home to Arkansas State. I am quite certain Miami is better than Arkansas State.

Miami 27 Texas A&M 17

Matt: Miami -3.5

Don’t look now, but is that a little bit of swagger I see coming back to the U? They played Florida a lot closer than the final score indicated, and seemed to look and act like they belonged on the same field as the Gators. Throw in the fact that Randy Shannon is cleaning up in recruiting in southern Florida, and I see a full on resurgence for Miami as soon as next year. There is NO reason why they should not be a perennial contender like years past. Don’t feel the same about Texas A&M.

While I’m talking about the U, props to their AD and Nebraska for getting a deal worked out for a home and home. Although I find it ludicrous that Miami didn’t demand that Nebraska play their “home” game in Orlando. I thought that is how these deals work.

Mike: Texas A&M +3.5

This would be the game of the week in 1992. In 2008, however, these two teams are known primarily for the name on their jerseys rather than the quality of their play. Miami showed some spunk in its visit to the Swamp, but the Canes have done nothing to suggest that they will soon shake free of their longstanding offensive malaise. Texas A&M has simply looked terrible under new coach Mike Sherman, as the Aggies lost to Arkansas State at home and squeaked by New Mexico in Albuquerque. Notwithstanding Texas A&M’s struggles, I refuse to lay points on Miami in a road game until the Canes provide more evidence that they are capable of scoring points against an opponent from BCS conference.

Texas A&M 17 Miami 14

Doug: Miami (FL) -3.5

While I never like to pick against a home underdog with some semblance of a tradition, Miami showed me something against Florida two weeks ago. I was not sold on the idea of Randy Shannon taking over at Miami (and still am not completely buying in), but he is starting to right the ship. They are much better this year than they were the last couple years, and I don't see any reason why the Canes can't win 8 or so games this year. Texas A&M is awful, and I think The U is looking to make a statement. Their defense is really good, so I can't see A&M putting up more than 10 or so points in this game.

Miami 21 A&M 7

East Carolina -7.5 at NC State (ESPN 12pm) -

Dan: East Carolina -7.5

ECU burned me last week and cost me my “Can’t Miss” teaser. However, NC State, despite their narrow cover against Clemson last week, is just not good. This ECU team is starting to feel like a one of those mid-major teams from the past few years where everyone keeps waiting for them to fall flat on their face, and next think you know it is November and they’re 9 – 0. Skip Holtz will have the team refocused after narrowly escaping defeat at the hands of the mighty Tulane “Fisher Hall Wanna-Be’s” Green Wave. This week, though, I expect ECU to hold on to the ball after the 4 turn-overs last week. Unfortunately for Tommy O’Brien, Chuck Amato left the cupboard pretty bare. The Wolfpack is in for a long season.

East Carolina 24 NC State 10

Matt: NC State +7.5

I’m just not ready to go with E.C. freaking U. as a 7.5 point favorite on the road against a BCS team. Can’t do it. Although half the stadium will undoubtedly be wearing purple.

Mike: East Carolina (-7.5)

East Carolina survived a serious scare last week against Tulane on the road, but the Pirates managed to pull out a huge win behind the passing of Patrick Pinkney. NC State has looked undermanned and uninspired in its first 3 games and it’s not too early to wonder whether Tom O’Brien’s stern, businesslike approach will take root in Raleigh. I still think that NC State’s problems stem primarily from the poor recruiting of former coach, Chuck Amato, rather than O’Brien’s coaching methods, which means that the Wolfpack may experience an extended period of growing pains before any tangible signs of progress appear. On the other hand, NC State lost its first five games against FBS opponents last year before upsetting East Carolina in Greenville, so perhaps history will repeat itself in 2008.

East Carolina 31 NC State 20

Doug: NC State +7.5

Man, NC State has a pretty tough schedule this year. We've previewed them three times already, and it has nothing to do with NC State. While I think East Carolina can win this game and stay unbeaten, I can't give them 7.5 points on the road after barely squeaking by Tulane last week. East Carolina is having a great year, but let's get real here. They snuck up on Va. Tech and WVU, and I think their momentum is starting to slow down a little. Honestly, I think NC State will find a way to win this game.

If East Carolina wins this game big, I think they should be in the top 10, maybe even the top 5. Who has better or more impressive wins?? West Virginia, Va. Tech, at Tulane, and NC State. That's pretty impressive. Skip Holtz appears to be a rising star. Lou must be thrilled to see what his son is doing down at ECU.

NC State 27 ECU 24

Wake Forest +4.5 at Florida State (ESPN2 7pm) -

Dan: Wake Forest +4.5

The fighting Bobby Bowdens continue their revival tour by hosting a Wake Forest team that knocked them from the rankings last year. This week’s polls represent their first return to the Top 25 since that loss. Maybe it’s my colleague Matt’s new found affinity for the Demon Deacons, but I’m a little perplexed to see Wake getting 4.5 points against a FSU team that has not resembled the 90s Seminoles for some time. While Wake has actually barely won against Ole Miss last week, FSU has blown away its two opponents. However, I’ll take close wins against SEC teams over 40 point victories over 1-AA opponents any day of the week. That said, you know the Jenn Sterger and Co. in Tallahassee will be rocking for a Saturday night game at the Doak. In fact, I think the Seminoles actually come out with a chip on their shoulder and show they are ready to contend for the ACC title again. That said, I think the game remains close and I’m going to take the points given that Wake has won two straight in this series.

Another side note – does anyone else think Bowden and Paterno are effectively still coaching just to wait for the other one to die? I mean, they are neck in neck in total wins, and it is pretty clear neither has much to say about the way their team plays the game anymore. They are really both just figureheads. I think that once on of them dies, the other will wait until he passes him (unless he’s already in first), and then retire. They should somehow just rig it so that they are tied at the end of a season and have both of them quit. Neither of them is really doing much for their respective schools these days and it is pretty much just a farce to see them on the sideline. Anyway, enough of that rant…

Florida State 31 Wake Forest 28

Matt: Wake Forest +4.5

Wow, prime-time under the lights in Tallahassee for the Deacs. I’m fired up about this game. You just know that Jim Grobe is playing the no respect card in that locker room. Let’s face it, nobody expects little old Wake Forest to be able to go and beat the athletes from Florida State. Meanwhile, some guy named Christian Ponder, who has thrown 6 td’s in two games (against…cough…Western Carolina and Chattanooga), is guaranteeing victory. With a week to prepare and those quotes on the bulleting board, I think Wake drops the hammer and wins BIG – 2 td’s.

Mike: Wake Forest (+4.5)

Will this be the year that Florida State rises up again to reclaim its spot atop the ACC? This Saturday should provide us with an immediate answer to that question, as the Seminoles have a terrific opportunity to reclaim a portion of their lost respect by defeating a Wake Forest team that has filled the void in the ACC created by FSU’s recent struggles. The Demon Deacons have defeated Bobby Bowden’s Seminoles in each of the last two seasons, including a 30-0 drubbing in their last meeting at Doak Campbell Stadium, and Jim Grobe’s squad is off to another good start with two wins over BCS conference schools (albeit Ole Miss and Baylor). Florida State has feasted on cupcakes in the first few weeks, though questions remain about the Seminoles, especially on offense. The difference in this game will be quarterback play, as Wake Forest’s Riley Skinner will outperform FSU QBs Christian Ponder and D’Vondrey Richardson en route to a big road victory.

Wake Forest 21 Florida State 20

Doug: Florida State -4.5

While I was awfully tempted to pick Wake Forest here based on the glowing reports from Matt about the Demon Deacons, give me the Florida State Seminoles in a statement win in the ACC. Just got a funny feeling that Bobby Bowden has one last run in store for us. They went through some growing pains last year, but now Jimbo Fisher's offense is starting to kick in. Preston Posey is back from his suspension, and this QB Christian Ponder is GUARANTEEING a win. I know the guarantee is the most overrated thing in sports today, but FSU has been pointing to this game all year. I just feel like they are going to come out of the tunnel ready to explode on Saturday under the lights in Tallahassee.

If FSU loses a home game to Wake Forest that they have been gearing up for all offseason, then Bobby Bowden should retire in the locker room after the game. I think FSU is a bit of a sleeper, so give me the Noles in a blowout win.

FSU 31 Wake Forest 10

Virginia Tech +2 at North Carolina (ABC 3:30pm) -

Dan: Virginia Tech +2

Virginia Tech is coming off a close win at home against a tough Georgia Tech team while the Tar Heels are fresh off a drubbing of Rutgers in New Jersey. Generally, both of the prior week results would lead me to pick against them. I think I would lean towards the Hokies in this one though, because I think UNC may be a little bit cocky this week. Throw in the fact that, at the end of the day, Carolina is still a year (or two) away and Va Tech is still coached by Frank Beamer, and I’ll take the points in a close one. I would be surprised to see a special teams play by the Hokies be the deciding factor.

Virginia Tech 21 North Carolina 20

Matt: Virginia Tech +2

Frank, the thank you card is in the mail for making me look like I knew what I was talking about with my prediction last week. Now do it again. Isn’t this a game that BeamerBall always finds a way to win? And again, not to channel Simmons again, but I’m feeling the popsicle corollary with this UNC team. You barely squeaked by McNeese State and then beat an apparently bad Rutgers team. No need to go overboard yet.

Mike: Virginia Tech (+2)

In Chapel Hill, the upstart Tar Heels have an opportunity to prove that they can supplant Virginia Tech as champions of the ACC Coastal Division. Carolina proved that it has plenty of talent on both sides of the ball last week, but it remains to be seen whether this young team will possess the focus and consistency that they will need to defeat a well coached Hokie squad. With Tyrod Taylor firmly entrenched as the full time starter, Virginia Tech’s offense will control the clock and its defense will frustrate the UNC offense. Butch Davis will eventually lead his team to the top of the ACC, but they haven’t arrived yet.

Virginia Tech 16 North Carolina 14

Doug: Virginia Tech +2

While I think that North Carolina is on the rise, I really like Virginia Tech in this game. If you had set this line before the season started, it probably would have been something along the lines of VT -8.5. VT has had some struggles, but I think they are starting to right the ship and have found Tyrod Taylor as a QB. VT has a history of starting slow and getting better, and I think they are about to hit their stride. There is a reaon why Frank Beamer has won as many games as he has. He knows how to build a team, and I think they will be geared up to steal this one on the road. The conference title still runs through Blacksburg if you ask me.

I was VERY impressed with UNC last week, but I am not quite ready to pick them to beat Virginia Tech. Butch Davis is an outstanding coach, their defense flies around, and UNC has some legitimately dangerous skill players. However, VT has had a winning formular for 15 years: great defense and special teams. I think they'll find a way to win in Chapel Hill.

VT 17 UNC 14

Arizona -1 at UCLA (FSN 3pm) -

Dan: UCLA +1

The other representative of the Grand Canyon state also had an embarrassing loss against New Mexico last week. The Stoops family reputation is slowly being called into question as the lesser known Mike Stoops continue to struggle at Arizona. When he was hired before the 2004 season, everyone thought he’d be competing for 2nd or 3rd in the PAC 10 (notice a general acceptance of 1st place?). However, he has since gone a disappointing 19-30 overall and 12-22 in the conference. The only reason this game does not have a huge spread is that UCLA lost in even more embarrassing fashion to BYU last week. I thought UCLA +9 was easy money. Probably my worst read in a while. However, I’m going to give them one more shot and think they bounce back in the comfort of the Rose Bowl.

UCLA 24 ASU 21

Matt: UCLA +1

I don’t care who is suiting up at QB for the Bruins, I cannot in good faith pick Mike Stoops as a road favorite. I guess now is a good time to mention that the Pac 10 went 0-4 last week against the mighty Mountain West Conference. And was there a score more out of left field than BYU 59 UCLA 0?

Mike: UCLA +1

These two teams probably can’t wait for this game to start after both were humiliated last week. Following a loss at New Mexico, Mike Stoops finds himself squarely on the hot seat in Tuscon, while Rick Neuheisel must pick up the pieces after his team was lambasted 59-0 by BYU. Despite the massive margin of victory, UCLA is not as bad as last week’s score suggests and Arizona still has a weak defense. I expect UCLA to run the ball much better and keep the game close for QB Kevin Craft, who actually played reasonably well against BYU. The Bruins will respond with a big bounce back performance in Westwood.

UCLA 27 Arizona 24

Doug: UCLA +1

Are you kidding me with this line?? Arizona is a one point favorite on the road after losing last week to New Mexico?? What have they ever done to be a one point favorite on the road over anybody?? IS America that mesmerized by the last name Stoops that they will continue to buy into Arizona in spit of overwhelming evidence that they stink?? It's a slap in the face! I don't care if UCLA lost by 100 to BYU last week. They are at home in the Rose Bowl, the Cosmopolitans will be flowing, the shrimp cocktails will be getting passed around, the Wizard of Westwood will be in the house, and they are playing a lousy Arizona team that hasn't done anything since the fabled "Desert Swarm" era. UCLA is going to come out angry, and I'm expecting a blowout win. I'm so confident about it that I'll wear powder blue pants to work all next week if the Bruins lose.

By the way, between the Arizona and UCLA fanbases, will there be even one beer drank the entire weekend?? I'd be willing to bet that less that 1% of the Arizona and UCLA alums could name their quarterbacks, and I'd also be willing to bet that there will be more discussions about the Summer X games than football all weekend.

UCLA 27 Arizona 17

Vanderbilt +5.5 at Ole Miss (Check Local Listings) -

Dan: Ole Miss -5.5

I have to admit that I don’t know anything about these two teams. And really, I’m not sure I want to. Jay Cutler is in the NFL and Ed Orgeron is out at Ole Miss. I do know that Ole Miss has Jevon Snead, the Texas transfer. Snead threw for 4 TDs against Wake Forrest before putting up a terrible game against Samford. However, in the SEC I’ll take the home team and the athletic quarterback.

Ole Miss 28 Vanderbilt 21

Matt: Ole Miss -5.5

I saw Ole Miss in person a couple weeks ago against Wake and was very impressed. Jevon Snead is going to lead the Rebels to at least one big upset this year in the SEC. I also think that Vandy is a respectable program as the frisky underdog, but don’t see them going into Vaught Hemingway and upsetting Ole Miss.

Mike: Ole Miss -5.5

In Oxford, Bobby Johnson’s surprising Commodores travel to play a competitive Rebel squad. Vanderbilt responded nicely last week in a potential letdown game against a strong offensive Rice squad and they have a chance to move closer toward bowl eligibility and a Top 25 ranking with another win. In Oxford, Houston Nutt appears to have some playmakers on both sides of the ball, including former Texas QB Jevan Snead, who is progressing nicely for Ole Miss. The Rebels possess the talent advantage in this game and I expect them to be well prepared in their conference opener. Moreover, there is a possibility that Vanderbilt will respond poorly to its newfound success, like many other traditional doormats have done in the past. Ole Miss should roll in the Grove this Saturday.

Mississippi 30 Vanderbilt 17

Doug: Ole Miss -5.5

The way things are looking in Oxford, there might be a reason to go to an Ole Miss home game other than to visit the pageantry of "The Grove." They look like they could be a solid middle of the pack team in the SEC this year, and they need to find a way to win this one for bowl eligibility. Vandy looks like they are also pretty good this year and might steal this game, but I'll take the Rebels.

How bummed out must Ed Orgeron be that the talent he recruited to Ole Miss is now starting to emerge. They have some athletes, and Jevan Snead looks like he could be good. Must be killing Coach O to see it.

Ole Miss 23 Vandy 14

Mississippi State +7.5 at Georgia Tech (Raycom 12pm) -

Dan: Georgia Tech -7.5

I seem to be falling prey to my usual downfall in gambling and taking far too many favorites this week. But despite the great defensive performance last week against Auburn, I don’t think the Bulldogs can repeat on the road against a Paul Johnson led Yellow Jacket team. I have a lot of confidence in Paul Johnson as a coach and I think after last week’s close lose in Blacksburg, he takes care of business at home.

Georgia Tech 20 Mississippi State 10

Matt: Georgia Tech -7.5

Mississippi State can not score. It’s as simple as that. That game against Auburn set back college football 50 years. I have never seen an offense as inept as that. Sly Croom seriously looked like he wanted to murder a few of his players – and I can’t say that I blame him. GT came close to beating Virginia Tech and I think the Paul Johnson experiment keeps running smoothly for another week.

Mike: Georgia Tech -7.5

Mildly interesting matchup here. Although the game is in Starkville, a Mississippi State upset here would provide additional fodder to the ACC’s growing legion of critics. Georgia Tech squandered a golden opportunity to secure a second consecutive road win last week in a mistake filled game against Virginia Tech in Blacksburg and the Jackets may come out flat in this non-conference game. MSU has a strong defense and Tech’s offensive struggles could continue, but I think that Paul Johnson will be able to extract enough points out of his team for a workmanlike cover against the offensively challenged Bulldogs.

Georgia Tech 20 Mississippi State 10

Doug: Georgia Tech -7.5

While I hate that many points in this game, Mississippi State stinks. Their offense is absolutely pathetic, and I can't see them moving it on anybody let alone Georgia Tech. The Yellow Jackets are battle tested, and MSU is lousy on the road. I don't really like this pick all that much, but give me Georgia Tech. Paul Johnson hasn't let me down yet, so I might as well ride him for another week.

Utah -7.5 at Air Force (Versus 4pm) -

Dan: Utah -7.5

The battle of two MWC undefeateds presents us with yet another home underdog (Anyone else notice there are a ton of “Home dogs” this week?). Since marching into The Big House and taking it to the Wolverines, Utah has easily taken care of business. I think Utah’s defense, which looked pretty good against Michigan will be able to contain the option. Air Force, on the other hand, is in for a tough game against Utah spread.

Utah 35 Air Force 21

Matt: Utah -7.5

With Fresno State losing a heartbreaker to Wisconsin, we’re down to 3 possible non-BCS contenders. While Utah’s victory in the Big House is losing luster by the week, I don’t see the dream dying this week in Colorado Springs.

Mike: Utah -7.5

Last week at Houston, Air Force won without completing a single pass. Then again, running for 300 yards is generally a good formula for success By comparison to Houston, Utah features a more explosive offense and a stronger defense, so it’s highly unlikely that AF can compete without getting some production from their passing game. This series is traditionally close and I expect AF to battle hard on its home field before eventually succumbing to a superior Utes team.
Utah 38 Air Force 28

Doug: Air Force +7.5

The Mountain West! Great week for the Mountain West last week. Maybe the game of the year so far in the Mountain West Conference, which is actually a very underrated conference. Two undefeated teams who have looked impressive so far. I really like Air Force to cover in this game, and I would go so far as to say that Air Force will win this game. It's a home game, they've played well so far, and Chad Hall might be the best white running back in America not named Sam McGuffie. Seriously, the guy is a fun player to watch.

How about the white running back making a resurgence in 2008?? I love it! Is this a trend?? Somehwere Larry Cszonka and John Riggins are saying "It's about time!"

Air Force 31 Utah 30

Georgia -6.5 at Arizona State (ABC 8pm) -

Dan: Georgia -6.5

Another SEC road favorite, but this time the home underdog is a PAC 10 team. Georgia won a close one against South Carolina last week while ASU lost in overtime to a UNLV team that probably spends more time at the Hard Rock pool than at the practice field. ASU was expected to compete for 2nd place in the PAC 10 after returning Rudy Carpenter this year, but things are not looking up for Erickson’s team at this point. While I don’t think Georgia is going to blow them out, I do think they can win by at least a touch down.

Georgia 31 Arizona State 21

Matt: Georgia -6.5

Can we call this the Overrated Bowl? I’m still trying to figure out how Arizona State lost at home to UNLV? Bold prediction – Arizona State is a 7-5 team. Georgia remains undefeated for exactly one more week.

Mike: Arizona State +6.5

In light of Arizona State’s stunning home loss to UNLV last week, Georgia’s first visit out of Dixie in over 40 years has lost a bit of luster. Given ASU’s penchant for faltering in the face of heightened expectations, however, the Sun Devils may actually benefit from the fact that this game will not provide them with an opportunity to vault into the national championship race. The critical matchup for ASU will be whether their retooled offensive line can handle Georgia’s tough front seven, thus providing Rudy Carpenter with ample time to find his talented receivers, Chris McGaha and Mike Jones (who?). Although some pundits have knocked Georgia for its inability to defeat South Carolina handily, the Bulldogs should be lauded for a gritty road win against a stingy Gamecock defense in a rivalry game. Unfortunately for Mark Richt’s crew, I believe that the physical nature of the South Carolina game, coupled with a cross-country trip against a strong opponent, will serve as the perfect recipe for an upset.

Arizona State 24 Georgia 21

Doug: Georgia -6.5

Should be a fun atmosphere down in Tempe. One of my favorite places to watch a college football game with the mountains in the backdrop and the great party atmosphere on Mill Avenue. This is a scary game for Georgia because Arizona State has nothing to lose and probably will let it all hang out on the field. Still, Georgia is going to dominate the line of scrimmage in this game, and they should be able to run all over ASU. ASU has some flashy pieces, but we saw what happened last year when they played teams that were strong up front. They got killed by USC and Texas down the stretch, and I expect the same thing to happen again this week. Georgia is vastly overrated if you ask me, but I think they'll survive this game and move on undefeated into the SEC season.

Over/under on the number of times Brent Musberger mentions how great a time he is having in Tempe on Mill Avenue: 7. Over/under on the number of times Kirk Herbstreit subtly indicates that he woke up in an ASU sorority house the morning before the game: 3

Georgia 24 ASU 13

Florida -7.5 at Tennessee (CBS Sports 3:30pm) -

Dan: Tennessee +7.5

Even more tempting than most home underdogs are home underdogs in the SEC. SEC football takes home field advantage to a whole new level. Hell, even Vandy has won a couple unexpected games at home over the past few years. Mississippi played Auburn to a 3-2 game last week. It’s tough to go on the road and win in the SEC. Then throw in the ever bitter nature of the Florida Tennessee rivalry, and you know you’re in for something special on Saturday. While I’d feel more comfortable if this were a night game, I think Tennessee keeps this one close. Florida may be coming off a bye week, but sometimes that actually can result in a bit of a slow start. After finally beating Miami after such a long drought, I think Florida comes out a little flat. They’ll still win, and the rumblings will start again in Knoxville, but look for the Vols to cover at home. (But barely.)

Florida 24 Tennessee 17

Matt: Florida -7.5

For as much as Urban Meyer pledged to find a running game this year, well, Florida still has no running game this year. There is a familiar face leading the team in rushing, and he doesn’t play running back. You can’t tell me there aren’t talented runners on the roster, it’s just that Urban refuses to give them the ball. The most carries a running back has is 10! Emmanuel Moody, who was supposed to be a stud, has toted the rock twice! Yo Urban, they can’t run it if you don’t hand it to them.

On the other sideline, I get the feeling that Philip Fulmer is in some serious trouble. Have you checked their next 6 game out? Besides for a gimme against Northern Illinois, it’s Florida, @Auburn, @Georgia, Miss St and Alabama. Yo! They are staring 3-4 in the face. I don’t think the locals will take to kindly to another 7-5 type year.

Mike: Tennessee +7.5

In Neyland Stadium, Urban Meyer looks to continue his recent mastery of Phil Fulmer and the Volunteers. Although Florida has been impressive on both sides of the ball, their defense has not really been tested yet. It is unclear whether Tennessee’s offense can provide that test, as Jonathan Crompton has struggled his first two outings as Erik Ainge’s replacement. Nonetheless, the Volunteers feature a strong offensive line and a tremendous running back in Arian Foster, which should allow them to move the ball in this game without receiving an extraordinary performance from Crompton. The combination of Tim Tebow and an extra week of preparation, however, will be the difference for the Gators in a hard fought, physical battle in Knoxville this week.

Florida 28 Tennessee 24

Doug: Florida -7.5

Verne, Gary, and the boys from CBS Sports are headed to Knoxville this week for a great one. Always fun to see these two uniforms on the same field. While I ordinarily want nothing to do with betting against a home underdog in the SEC, I am riding Florida as far as I can this year. Florida is an offense capbalbe of getting into the 30s and 40s every week. Meanwhile, Tennessee's offense is in shambles and looks like they are really missing the wise words of David Cutcliffe (who has become to Phil Fulmer what Leo Mazzone was to Bobby Cox). The coaching matchup here is a laugher. Urban Meyer at the apex of his abilities against Phil Fulmer maybe at the lowest point of his career. Never underestimate a desperate coach, but that matchup tilts heavily toward Florida. Florida has owned Tennessee i the Urban Meyer era, so give me the Gators. Although USC looked incredible last week, I'm sticking with my Florida pick for the national title. Fulmer is done after this year if you ask me.

Florida 27 Tennessee 14

LSU -2.5 at Auburn (ESPN 7:45pm) -
Dan: LSU -2.5

Part of me feels like this is the easiest bet of the week. Another part of me is screaming that this is a gambler’s nightmare game with Auburn coming off a poor performance with the worst score possible for a win (3 – 2) in the game of football. I also am always extremely hesitant to pick home against home underdogs in the SEC. Just like last week with the Gamecock push (ATS) (or Auburn vs. MSU for that matter) home teams in the SEC are always more competitive than expected. However, the Auburn offense has not been overly impressive (or impressive at all for that matter), and LSU has been dominant (albeit against weak competition). I expect LSU to relatively easily cover in a surprisingly low scoring game.

LSU 17 Auburn 6

Matt: LSU – 2.5

LOCK OF THE MILLENIUM! Not to sound like Bill Simmons…but I have very few sports gambling rules in life. However, one of them is when a team that is installing a square peg spread offense with a round hole roster wins 3-2 against the worst team in the conference, and then said team plays the defending National Champions and is only a 2.5 point favorite, ALWAYS bet on the National Champions. I don’t think Auburn scores a single point.

Mike: Auburn (+2.5)

Another terrific matchup, courtesy of the SEC. The jury is still out on LSU, which has only played one game against a FBS opponent. Consequently, the Bayou Bengals have been able to ease Andrew Hatch into the offense by bludgeoning their opponents into submission behind a strong offensive line and the powerful running of Charles Scott. While playing at home against North Texas and Appalachian State is one thing, I suspect that Hatch will have a slightly different experience in his first road start under the lights at Jordan-Hare Stadium against an outstanding Auburn defense. On the other sideline, much has been made of Auburn’s offensive struggles under new OC Tony Franklin, particularly after last week’s 3-2 victory at Mississippi State, but I suspect that Auburn will fare better this week against a young LSU defense that has not been tested yet. More importantly, there are few coaches in college football who can prepare their teams in big games like Tommy Tuberville. I think Auburn will shut down LSU’s running game, force Hatch into some mistakes and provide enough offense to get the win.

Auburn 16 LSU 6

Doug: LSU -2.5

Should be a great atmosphere down at Auburn this week (I know, Phil, we blew it by not getting ourselves down there for this game). After watching Auburn last weeek, I can't say that I'm particularly impressed with their offense. Auburn is clearly a team in transition, and they have struggled to move the ball in the new spread offense. I made the mistake of buying into the new and improved Auburn offense and taking fliers on Brad Lester and Rodrigues Smith. At this point, I would stay away from all Auburn players.

I know LSU has some QB issues, but do they even need a great performance from Andrew Hatch to win this game?? LSU is loaded with backs and WRs, their o-line is strong, their defense is nasty, and Les "Have a GREAT day" Miles is fully settled in down in Baton Rouge. All they need is for Hatch to not turn the ball over, and I think they can win this game easily. LSU is on cruise control, and I don't see any reason why they won't win here.

For what it's worth, after spending last weekend with the biggest Auburn fan I know and his girlfriend (who is an LSU alum), I can't wait to hear some stories following this game. Nothing is off the table as far as I'm concerned.

LSU, Florida, and USC are the three best programs in the country, and it all starts up front with them. They have all the flashy skill players, but the consistency in those programs comes from their ability to dominate the line of scrimmage on offense and defense. Get pressure on the QB, keep your QB protected, and move the man in front of you off the ball. It's a simple formula.

LSU 17 Auburn 3

Notre Dame at Michigan State (ABC 3:30pm) -

Dan: Notre Dame

I have to admit that I was shocked when I saw one website with an opening line on this game of ND +9. I’m curious to see this money line, because it may inspire me to break (again) my fake promise to myself never to bet on my own team. We aren’t picking against the spread here, given our inherent bias, but I have to tell you that I really like ND ATS this week. I’ll let Doug do the expounding, as he is so good at doing, but I think that if ND can put 8 in the box and stop Ringer, they can have a pretty successful week. Hoyer has not gotten off to a good start, and the extremely impressive ND secondary can hold its own against the no-name MSU receivers.

On the other side of the ball, the ND passing game is really starting to look like it is ready for the big time. While the run game can certainly still use some work, it is already better than last year and capable of operating as a serviceable change of pace.

Heading into this season, I had this game circled as our toughest game (outside of USC) of the season. However, I saw enough last week to make me change my opinion of this team. I expect our receivers to create enough separation to get a couple big plays. I also think well finally break through on special teams and get a big play that will either lead to a touch down or put us in position to score (the UM fumbles last week don’t count). And finally, I think Ringer will have a good game, but not good enough.

Notre Dame 31 MSU 27

Matt: Michigan State

Doug and Jeremy did their usual tremendous assessment of the Michigan State game. Color me worried that if we let Sam McGuffie run for that many yards, Javon Ringer is going to be all over the field. This could be a Tashard Choice type game where he is a Heisman front runner by sun down. Throw in the house of horrors that is Spartan Stadium, and I’m not feeling a W. I hope I’m wrong.

Mike: Michigan State

Notre Dame should be able to pass the ball effectively this week against a Spartan defense with a banged up secondary and a pedestrian pass rush. On defense, I think ND’s undersized defensive line and poor tackling will allow Javon Ringer to run wild and control the clock. It will be interesting to see how ND’s blitz-happy defense will fare against a more conventional attack this week, as opposed to a gimmick offense. Obviously, I hope that I am wrong, but I believe that Sparty will wear down the Irish in a physical game and break the home game curse in this series.

Michigan State 35 Notre Dame 28

Doug: Notre Dame

Before the season, I had this game as one of my two guaranteed losses on the schedule. I figured that we would beat Michigan, run into a buzzsaw at MSU, and get stomped by USC. I think those three games are the three toughest on the schedule, and I felt like we would go 1-2 in those games (and maybe drop 1-2 others along the way).

After watching this team plow through Michigan, I'm talking myself into a win up in East Lansing over Michigan State. Heck, I was so excited about the win over Michigan that I immediately made plans to go up to East Lansing for the game. Well, I'm headed up there this weekend, and I'm calling for a huge Irish victory. This team was fortunate to get by SDSU, came out smoking against Michigan, and now I think everything is snowballing from here. We are starting to hit our stride, and this team has a ton of confidence heading into this game.

Keys to this game for the Irish -

1) Move the football - I don't care how we move the ball, but we have to find ways to move the chains and keep drives going. The running game is going to have to continue to improve and give us a chance to pick up first downs on 3rd and short. We cannot afford to have a bunch of 3 and outs in this game because Ringer will eventually wear our defense down and start to break off bigger chunks of yardage in the second half. I don't even care if we get points out of our drives. Just need to move the ball and keep the field position game in our favor. We won the field position game against Michigan, and we need to do it again this week to have a chance.


2) Turnovers/Penalties - We obviously cannot turn the ball over in this game like we did against SDSU. No fumbles, no bad INTs, and especially no special teams breakdowns. I also think that a lack of penalties through two games has been a nice sign for this team. Holding penalties are an absolute killer, and it would be nice to see it remain that way again.

3) Big Plays - The Golden Tate-Jimmy Clausen connection needs to be in full effect in this game. It would be great to hit some big stuff in the passing game to soften them up and maybe get some points on the scoreboard. I think Clausen is gaining confidence, so I'm hoping that he plays well in his first road game of the year.

4) Stop Ringer - If we can't slow down Ringer in this game, forget about it. Can't afford to let him run wild on us and set things up for their passing game.

5) Emotion - We all know the importance of emotion in college football, and it is going to be imperative that we match the intensity of the Spartans, especially early on. I hope that our guys are ready to play after the big win over Michigan. A blowout or ugly performance in East Lansing will take away a lot of the positive momentum from the Michigan game, so I hope the coaches have our guys focused for this upcoming game. MSU is going to come at us right away and try to blow us out of the building, so we better strap it up and be ready to take on their physical style.

While I am well aware that this game will be an absolute war, I think the Irish can steal a win and keep the undefeated season going. At the end of the day, we have more talent than Michigan State, and I think we have the advantage at quarterback. If Clausen plays the game of his life and wins this game, he could be well on his way to becoming a Notre Dame legend.

Go Irish!

ND 27 MSU 24

Last week:

Dan: 7-6-1
Matt: 6-7-1
Mike: 6-7-1
Doug: 6-7-1

Season:

Dan: 7-6-1
Matt: 26-18-1
Mike: 25-19-1
Doug: 23-21-1