Just wanted to throw out some thoughts on the big ND victory in the Aloha Bowl:
1) Loose, relaxed, healthy, and motivated can go a long way
What a difference it makes for this team to actually play with some confidence. One of the problems that I've noticed with ND football over the last 10 years or so is that we are so uptight out there on the field. Maybe our guys get bogged down with the day to day stuff in South Bend and schoolwork and all that. For whatever reason, there are a ton of guys who are either disappointments or straight up busts at ND that suddenly break out when they get to the NFL. How does that happen?? Is there something in the water at ND that stifles these guys in college??
This team went to Hawaii, relaxed, focused on football, and what do you know. They go out and play their best game in probably 3 years (if not longer). They were flying around, everyone was making plays, and the special teams looked better than it has looked than at any time in the Weis era.
I know it was just Hawaii (who is not a very good team and lost to some bad teams at home this year), but we SMOKED them. Good teams beat bad teams like a drum, and that's exactly what we did in this game. All three phases of the game played well, and everyone contributed. How do we look like gangbusters in the Hawaii Bowl but struggle to beat similar teams (SDSU, Syracuse) during the regular season?? Why can't we replicate that type of performance during the regular season? It's not like this team had a ton of practice time to revamp their team. We had like half a dozen practices before this game, and yet we played our best game.
Maybe our guys have too much on their plate in South Bend. Maybe they have to spend too much time shake alumni hands and going to "functions" and studying and doing all the other non-football stuff (going to mass, etc) that they are worn out by gameday. I really think there might be something to that. For this Hawaii trip, our guys had fun, they bonded, they focused on football, they were isolated from all the South Bend/ND drama, and it worked.
There's always been something strange about ND bringing in all these top 10 players and then watching these guys underachieve. Maybe there is too much "other" stuff going on in South Bend that our players can't focus on football. That's not a Weis problem. It's an ND problem. Football should be about fun, especially in college. ND the school needs to make sure that the players are having fun and enjoying themselves. When the players are enjoying the game, they are more likely to play well.
2) ND looked healthy, but why did they look so unhealthy at the end of the year??
If you looked at Clausen during the Hawaii Bowl and went back and looked at him down the stretch against Navy, Syracuse, and BC, it was like watching a different player. He had zip on the ball, he was stepping into his throws, and he was playing with confidence. Same goes for the linemen. These guys were worn out at the end of the year, but they looked good against Hawaii.
I think a big priority for this team in 2009 is going to be to focus on team conditioining. We were completely gassed in November both mentally and physically. You can't be a winning team if you are sucking wind and breaking down at the end of the year. That has to change if this team is going to be a BCS-caliber team.
Clausen needs to get stronger and get himself in the best shape of his life going into next year. If he breaks down again in the second half of next year, we are going to lose to the Pitts and UConns and Stanfords of the world. The same thing will apply for all of our linemen. We can win the battles up front if we are mentally and physically tougher than our opponents. ND was a soft team this year, and that can't happen again next year if we are going to be good.
3) Should Weis coach from the press box??
Call me crazy, but I actually contemplated this idea for quite a bit during the game. It might not be the worst idea in the world. ND was JACKED UP on the sideline for this game, and guys like Corwin Brown and Haywood were down there firing people up. We need that on the sideline. ENERGY. When Weis is down there, the sideline looks like a morgue. Maybe the players are intimidated by Weis. Maybe he makes them nervous or something.
Word is starting to filter out that Corwin Brown gave the pregame speech of his life before the Hawaii Bowl. I guess Weis let him do the speech, and the players were ready to run through walls for this game. VERRRRRRRRRRRRRY interesting. The same source seems to indicate that the players have to stifle laughter when Weis tries to give a speech. I really think that we might be better off with Brown down there on the field and Weis up in the booth giving his insight.
Weis learned his trade in the booth. He might be more effective up there calling plays and observing things from above. He can leave the motivating and player interaction to Corwin Brown and whoever he brings in as the offensive coordinator. I'm not gonna lie, I like this idea a lot. Play to your strengths. Weis is not a motivator, but he knows schemes and things like that. Corwin Brown is a fiery guy who can handle the sideline stuff.
Just throwing that out there. Weis can still be the head coach in charge of recruiting and the staff and all that, but maybe he should let his staff take more of a role in handling the players. That is not Weis' strength, but it could be a strength for some other guys.
4) Are we the Arizona Cardinals of college football??
This analogy has come up, and I think there's probably a lot of truth to it. We are a pass-happy team that runs into trouble when teams get physical with us and wear us down. By the end of the season, the pass-happy stuff is less effective when the weather starts turning sour.
I hate playing like that, but that is basically who we are. If we could put together a dominant (and physical defense) to go with that offense, it can lead to a winning program.
This team will go as far as Clausen takes us. Let's be honest, Weis doesn't put a whole lot of focus on running the ball, so we are going to need to give Clausen time to throw and make sure that he is healthy enough to carry the offense for a 12 game season.
Weis has put us in position to become a steady 9-10 win team down the road, and I'm actually fine with that. It is certainly an upgrade over the past 10 years. If he continues to recruit well, he could emerge as the John Cooper of Notre Dame. And that's not a knock at all. Cooper had a good run at Ohio State and produced a lot of very good teams. They never got over the hump, but he recruited a lot of great players and increased the overall stature and profile of Ohio State football. They became a big time brand again under Cooper, and Weis may have a similar effect on ND's stature. If Weis continues to recruit well, he'll probably do enough to stay at ND and hopefully produce some really good football teams.
5) How much of a bounce will this win give us going into next year??
I'm not sure, but it certainly helps to go out on a high note. There have been no shortage of teams in recent history (Texas in the Holiday Bowl and Alabama in the Independence Bowl) that have used a bowl win as a springboard into a great offseason and a great season the following year. If guys like Clausen and Tate use this game as an opportunity to take the leadership roles on this team and motivate the guys to come together as a team, we may look back on the Hawaii Bowl as the turning point of this program under Weis.
It's going to be an interesting offseason, and I'm looking forward to seeing what changes are made. I think we'll see some assistant coach changes, and I think we'll see an improved attitude going into next year.
Go Irish. We'll have plenty of coverage of the ND football team in the offseason.
Showing posts with label Charlie Weis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charlie Weis. Show all posts
December 29, 2008
December 08, 2008
And Aloha Means Goodbye!
Somewhere Larry Biel and Chad Ford are high-fiving about the Irish coming to the Islands for the Hawaii Bowl. Maybe we could talk Biel into doing the game for ESPN so that we could get a few “Aloha means goodbyes” and “WITH AUTHORITY” lines out of him.
Maybe I’m in the minority on this one, but I like this game for the Irish. Do we belong in the a bowl game at 6-6 after that disastrous finish?? No, not at all. If there were fewer bowl games, we would not have been invited. And to be perfectly honest, I would have had no problem with ND turning down a bowl bid. But let’s be real here. There was no way ND was turning down a bowl game. What schools are turning down bowl bids these days?? Alabama played in the Independence Bowl last year. I don’t even think you are allowed to turn down bowl games anymore. At the end of the day, ND was accepting a bowl bid no matter what.
Considering the other options that were out there, I’m actually pleased with the game that we picked. In my eyes, it’s a win-win situation. If our team actually takes this game seriously, circles the wagons, and wins the game, we could use it as a springboard into next year. Texas went into their Holiday Bowl game last year with something to prove, and they used that game as a rallying point headed into this season. Alabama did the same thing in Shreveport. I hope the ND players view this game as an opportunity and not as some sort of vacation. Hawaii is not a great team by any means, but they at least have somewhat of a name and the game should get a pretty good tv rating being around the Christmas holidays. If we go out and make a statement on national tv, it could be a turning point for this program under Charlie Weis. I’ll be the first to say that I’m not a believer in Charlie Weis, but I hope he views this game as the start on a path to redemption. He better be treating this game as the Super Bowl like Bo Pelini did when he was the interim coach at Nebraska. If he wants to grab some facemasks, I’m all for it.
And if we lose, big deal. This season has been a disaster anyway, so another loss isn’t going to affect our program any more than the Syracuse game or any other loss in the last 15 years.
Recruiting is also going to play a big story here. It sounds like Manti Te’o is still legitimately interested in ND, so we can use this game to put a huge sell on Te’o to come to South Bend. Te’o is the next Rey Maulauga. If we lose this game but pick up Te’o, the trip will have been worth it.
Will I be surprised if we come out flat and lose?? No, of course not. We’ve been uninspired for over two months now, so nothing would be surprise me at this point. Hawaii is a thugged out team playing at home, and I will not be surprised at all if they are in Clausen’s face all night long. They are going to be fired up to play ND, so we better be prepared to match their intensity or it could be a long night.
Kirk Herbstreit said it best last night on the ESPN bowl selection show. Guys like Jimmy Clausen and Tate and company are now juniors. I know they are technically sophomores in class, but it is time for them to start thinking like they are juniors and the leaders of this program. The clock is ticking, and the window is closing up ever so slightly on their careers as hard as it is to believe. If Clausen and company want to be remembered as champions, they need to start with this game in Hawaii. They have reached the crossroads of their ND careers. If they are going to treat Hawaii as vacation to hang out on the beach and drinks mai tais, that’s how they’ll be remembered as ND. But if they go out there and run the Rainbows off the field, they could use it as an opportunity to get focused for 2009 and 2010.
As for the complaining from fans saying that ND should have gone to a different bowl like the Texas Bowl that more fans could have attended, give me a freaking break. The Texas Bowl?? What fans were going to attend the Texas Bowl?? Heck, I have been to 3 road ND games this year and swore that I would go to whatever bowl game the Irish played in, and even I lost all interest in going to the bowl game to see this team after we lost to Syracuse. Fans were not going to be signing up for the Texas Bowl or the Independence Bowl or any bowl that we ended up in. At this point, the bowl game is about the players and the coaches. The players voted to go to Hawaii, and I don’t blame them. If they wanted to go to Hawaii, then that’s cool with me.
Anyway, that’s my take on the Irish bowl game. If people don’t watch to watch, I don’t blame them. If we win 24-21 or something and look lousy, I doubt it will soothe the pain of the god awful season and surely will not clear up the controversy swirling around Charlie Weis. But maybe just maybe the Irish will show up ready to play on Christmas Eve and bring home a big win.
--- As for the Irish hoops team, tough loss on Saturday, but I’m not too stressed out about it. We are what we are. We have an experienced and talented team, but we also aren’t exactly trotting out a roster loaded with five star recruits. We are capable of beating anyone, but we also have enough weaknesses that a good team can beat us on any given day. Ohio State is a good team with a lot of talented young players (every guy on that team is a 4 or 5 star recruit other than the JUCO point guard and there are 3 future NBA players on the roster) and a good coach, they were “up” for the game, we didn’t play well, and they beat us. It happens in college hoops. If we played that game next week, it could be an entirely different story. While we didn’t play well at all, we battled back and showed a lot of heart to make it close.
Some thoughts on some players:
Harangody – Good to see Harangody back in business; hard to complain about 25 points out of him
McAlarney – Ohio State admittedly had a great game plan for us in this game by extending out on our shooters and going all out to shut down Kyle McAlarney. They were blanketing KMac the entire game. Credit to Thad for coming up with that game plan. While I agree that this strategy is a blueprint for beating ND, there are very few teams that are disciplined enough and have the athleticism to execute that strategy. Most teams do not have the discipline to get out on our shooters like OSU did, and KMac will burn those teams. I'm willing to tip my hat to Matta and say that he had a great game plan that his team executed. It happens. There have been plenty of games where Brey had a great game plan against an opposing coach (Rick Barnes, Bill Self, Boeheim, Calhoun, Pitino, etc) and put us in position to win big games. You can't win them all in college basketball, but I'll take my chances with Coach Brey in most games.
As for KMac, he probably needs to find some other ways to contribute and score for this team when the other team is taking away the three. And I’d like to see Brey work on getting McAlarney better looks even when teams are keying on him.
Ayers – Not to bang on Ayers, but we need to get more production out of him in 34 minutes when the other team is concentrating on KMac. 3 boards and 1 assist in 34 minutes to go with 3 3s when he was basically being ignored for most of the game?? Ayers is a senior. We probably need him to be more assertive.
I actually think Ayers is better off coming off the bench. He was better last year off the bench. He’s a little bit like David Graves in that respect.
Speaking of David Graves, they showed a montage of the last ND-OSU game on the scoreboard at the game, and then introduced Graves to the crowd. What a moment! He has packed on some pounds. Graves was always one of my favorite players at ND.
Zeller – As we have seen so many times in the past, Luke Zeller is a bit of a tease on the court. No knock on Zeller (who seems like a great guy from a great family), but he’s not capable of being a major contributor on a big time team. The guy is 6’11” but seems to be incapable of getting inside and banging for rebounds. If he’s not rebounding, he can’t get minutes in big games.
We need some people to step up to fill the void of Rob Kurz on the boards. OSU is not even a good rebounding team, and yet they got way too many second chance opportunities. If Zeller isn't going to give us an inside presence, then Nash needs to play more minutes. Nash should be on a mission to grab defensive rebounds. If I was Brey, I would be pounding that into his head. If we grabbed a few more boards yesterday, we would have won the game.
Bench - Did anyone even score off the bench?? I don't recall Peoples or Nash scoring at all. If a team is going to try to take out McAlarney as a strategy, we need guys like Nash and Zeller and Peoples to step up.
I know Kurz is a loss for this team, but it’s not like he’s Troy Murphy or something. He is replaceable. We have talented young guys who can come up and replace his minutes. Guys like Nash and Hillesland and Ayers need to step it up.
Tough loss on Saturday, but I think we’ll be fine. If we can regroup and get off to a good start in the Big East, we can put this loss behind us.
Maybe I’m in the minority on this one, but I like this game for the Irish. Do we belong in the a bowl game at 6-6 after that disastrous finish?? No, not at all. If there were fewer bowl games, we would not have been invited. And to be perfectly honest, I would have had no problem with ND turning down a bowl bid. But let’s be real here. There was no way ND was turning down a bowl game. What schools are turning down bowl bids these days?? Alabama played in the Independence Bowl last year. I don’t even think you are allowed to turn down bowl games anymore. At the end of the day, ND was accepting a bowl bid no matter what.
Considering the other options that were out there, I’m actually pleased with the game that we picked. In my eyes, it’s a win-win situation. If our team actually takes this game seriously, circles the wagons, and wins the game, we could use it as a springboard into next year. Texas went into their Holiday Bowl game last year with something to prove, and they used that game as a rallying point headed into this season. Alabama did the same thing in Shreveport. I hope the ND players view this game as an opportunity and not as some sort of vacation. Hawaii is not a great team by any means, but they at least have somewhat of a name and the game should get a pretty good tv rating being around the Christmas holidays. If we go out and make a statement on national tv, it could be a turning point for this program under Charlie Weis. I’ll be the first to say that I’m not a believer in Charlie Weis, but I hope he views this game as the start on a path to redemption. He better be treating this game as the Super Bowl like Bo Pelini did when he was the interim coach at Nebraska. If he wants to grab some facemasks, I’m all for it.
And if we lose, big deal. This season has been a disaster anyway, so another loss isn’t going to affect our program any more than the Syracuse game or any other loss in the last 15 years.
Recruiting is also going to play a big story here. It sounds like Manti Te’o is still legitimately interested in ND, so we can use this game to put a huge sell on Te’o to come to South Bend. Te’o is the next Rey Maulauga. If we lose this game but pick up Te’o, the trip will have been worth it.
Will I be surprised if we come out flat and lose?? No, of course not. We’ve been uninspired for over two months now, so nothing would be surprise me at this point. Hawaii is a thugged out team playing at home, and I will not be surprised at all if they are in Clausen’s face all night long. They are going to be fired up to play ND, so we better be prepared to match their intensity or it could be a long night.
Kirk Herbstreit said it best last night on the ESPN bowl selection show. Guys like Jimmy Clausen and Tate and company are now juniors. I know they are technically sophomores in class, but it is time for them to start thinking like they are juniors and the leaders of this program. The clock is ticking, and the window is closing up ever so slightly on their careers as hard as it is to believe. If Clausen and company want to be remembered as champions, they need to start with this game in Hawaii. They have reached the crossroads of their ND careers. If they are going to treat Hawaii as vacation to hang out on the beach and drinks mai tais, that’s how they’ll be remembered as ND. But if they go out there and run the Rainbows off the field, they could use it as an opportunity to get focused for 2009 and 2010.
As for the complaining from fans saying that ND should have gone to a different bowl like the Texas Bowl that more fans could have attended, give me a freaking break. The Texas Bowl?? What fans were going to attend the Texas Bowl?? Heck, I have been to 3 road ND games this year and swore that I would go to whatever bowl game the Irish played in, and even I lost all interest in going to the bowl game to see this team after we lost to Syracuse. Fans were not going to be signing up for the Texas Bowl or the Independence Bowl or any bowl that we ended up in. At this point, the bowl game is about the players and the coaches. The players voted to go to Hawaii, and I don’t blame them. If they wanted to go to Hawaii, then that’s cool with me.
Anyway, that’s my take on the Irish bowl game. If people don’t watch to watch, I don’t blame them. If we win 24-21 or something and look lousy, I doubt it will soothe the pain of the god awful season and surely will not clear up the controversy swirling around Charlie Weis. But maybe just maybe the Irish will show up ready to play on Christmas Eve and bring home a big win.
--- As for the Irish hoops team, tough loss on Saturday, but I’m not too stressed out about it. We are what we are. We have an experienced and talented team, but we also aren’t exactly trotting out a roster loaded with five star recruits. We are capable of beating anyone, but we also have enough weaknesses that a good team can beat us on any given day. Ohio State is a good team with a lot of talented young players (every guy on that team is a 4 or 5 star recruit other than the JUCO point guard and there are 3 future NBA players on the roster) and a good coach, they were “up” for the game, we didn’t play well, and they beat us. It happens in college hoops. If we played that game next week, it could be an entirely different story. While we didn’t play well at all, we battled back and showed a lot of heart to make it close.
Some thoughts on some players:
Harangody – Good to see Harangody back in business; hard to complain about 25 points out of him
McAlarney – Ohio State admittedly had a great game plan for us in this game by extending out on our shooters and going all out to shut down Kyle McAlarney. They were blanketing KMac the entire game. Credit to Thad for coming up with that game plan. While I agree that this strategy is a blueprint for beating ND, there are very few teams that are disciplined enough and have the athleticism to execute that strategy. Most teams do not have the discipline to get out on our shooters like OSU did, and KMac will burn those teams. I'm willing to tip my hat to Matta and say that he had a great game plan that his team executed. It happens. There have been plenty of games where Brey had a great game plan against an opposing coach (Rick Barnes, Bill Self, Boeheim, Calhoun, Pitino, etc) and put us in position to win big games. You can't win them all in college basketball, but I'll take my chances with Coach Brey in most games.
As for KMac, he probably needs to find some other ways to contribute and score for this team when the other team is taking away the three. And I’d like to see Brey work on getting McAlarney better looks even when teams are keying on him.
Ayers – Not to bang on Ayers, but we need to get more production out of him in 34 minutes when the other team is concentrating on KMac. 3 boards and 1 assist in 34 minutes to go with 3 3s when he was basically being ignored for most of the game?? Ayers is a senior. We probably need him to be more assertive.
I actually think Ayers is better off coming off the bench. He was better last year off the bench. He’s a little bit like David Graves in that respect.
Speaking of David Graves, they showed a montage of the last ND-OSU game on the scoreboard at the game, and then introduced Graves to the crowd. What a moment! He has packed on some pounds. Graves was always one of my favorite players at ND.
Zeller – As we have seen so many times in the past, Luke Zeller is a bit of a tease on the court. No knock on Zeller (who seems like a great guy from a great family), but he’s not capable of being a major contributor on a big time team. The guy is 6’11” but seems to be incapable of getting inside and banging for rebounds. If he’s not rebounding, he can’t get minutes in big games.
We need some people to step up to fill the void of Rob Kurz on the boards. OSU is not even a good rebounding team, and yet they got way too many second chance opportunities. If Zeller isn't going to give us an inside presence, then Nash needs to play more minutes. Nash should be on a mission to grab defensive rebounds. If I was Brey, I would be pounding that into his head. If we grabbed a few more boards yesterday, we would have won the game.
Bench - Did anyone even score off the bench?? I don't recall Peoples or Nash scoring at all. If a team is going to try to take out McAlarney as a strategy, we need guys like Nash and Zeller and Peoples to step up.
I know Kurz is a loss for this team, but it’s not like he’s Troy Murphy or something. He is replaceable. We have talented young guys who can come up and replace his minutes. Guys like Nash and Hillesland and Ayers need to step it up.
Tough loss on Saturday, but I think we’ll be fine. If we can regroup and get off to a good start in the Big East, we can put this loss behind us.
December 03, 2008
Coach Stays
Some thoughts on the latest news from ND football:
7) While I personally would have preferred to part ways with Weis after this season, I can’t say that I am surprised at all that a decision was made to bring Weis back next year. What indication did Swarbrick give at any point that he planned to make a coaching change?? He publicly defended Weis during the Navy game after that horrific performance at Boston College, and he said heading into the USC game that he intended to sit down with Weis after the season. And yet somehow internet message board posters interpreted that to mean that the “silence is deafening” and a bunch of other nonsense. The people on NDNation seemed to believe that Swarbrick was conducting some sort of super secret coaching search prior to his scheduled meeting with Weis. Other than blind hope, where do people come up with this stuff?? If anything, the silence from Swarbrick immediately after the season was a strong indication that Weis was coming back next year. If he was going to get fired, why not announce it the day after the USC game?? What school has ever waited two weeks before announcing that their coach is fired??
Swarbrick has been the AD at Notre Dame for 5 months. When he got hired to be the AD at ND, he most likely assumed that his biggest tasks would be to oversee the renovation of the JACC, be the lead negotiator on the BCS deal and a possible new Notre Dame tv network, and figuring out ways to raise cash for the school. He's not a football guy at all. What credentials does Swarbrick have to identify a football coach?? He has zero football background. I would bet that everyone reading this blog knows more football than Swarbrick. He wasn't in any position to make a critical evaluation of the head football coach. ND could have gone out and found an AD who knows sports and has experience in making these types of coaching evaluations, but they went in a different direction and hired a guy who specializes in contract law and business negotiations. If there was ever any doubt about where the priorities of the priests running ND are, that is your answer.
6) This decision may also be a timing thing. Perhaps Swarbrick just thought that a change this year was bad timing, and he wanted to wait a year to see if some things fall into our lap. That actually makes sense to me. We've had bad luck on timing in past coaching searches, so maybe Swarbrick just needs another year to see how the team plays and to see if any big coaching moves open up a path for a big name to come to ND. What if Urban Meyer goes to the NFL or something, fails, and wants to come back to college?? Plus, maybe Brian Kelly goes 11-1 next year and wins a BCS bowl over a big time team and becomes an obvious "tier 1" candidate. A lot can change in the next year. Let's be honest, half the ND fanbase would have freaked out if we had announced Chris Peterson as the new ND head coach next week.
At the end of the day, one more year to see what Weis can do isn't going to kill the program. He's still recruiting well. If he stinks again, he's probably done. By then, we’ll have another whole year of data to judge the young coaches and see if any of the big names get restless. Guys like Brian Kelly and Chris Peterson will still be around next year for us to look at. It’s not necessarily a bad thing to see if Brian Kelly can continue to win at UC. If he wins big again next year, ND fans might feel like he is a safer bet than he is right now.
And if Weis is great next year, then it was worth it to keep him around.
5) Since it appears that the buyout was a prohibitive factor for firing Weis this year, isn’t the buyout going to be a potential problem again next year if we have another disappointing season?? If the buyout is $20 million this year, isn’t it still going to be $17 or so million next year?? At some point, we are going to be in the unfortunate position of ponying up some serious cash to dump Weis.
This buyout thing is remarkable to me. We handed Weis a GUARANTEED $30 million with no out clause after a half season of football. How is that even possible?? I swear, ND burns through money like no one else.
4) What is the over/under going to be on wins next year now that Weis is coming back?? I’d probably put it in the 7.5-8 range.
S05 NEVADA
S12 @ Michigan
S19 MICHIGAN ST.
S26 @ Purdue
O03 WASHINGTON
O17 SOUTHERN CAL
O24 BOSTON COLLEGE
O31 Washington St. (SA)
N07 NAVY
N14 @ Pittsburgh
N21 CONNECTICUT
N28 @ Stanford
On paper, that schedule looks easy, but is there a lock win on there other than Navy and maybe Wazzou considering how poorly we played down the stretch??
Nevada – They were 7-5 this year, but they put up over 500 yards of offense a game. Sounds like most of their team will be back next year. Could be a scary game in the opener
Michigan – Tough to really say what they will look like next year, but I would hazard a guess that they will be better. Perhaps much better. Still have the QB issues going into next year, and I wouldn’t be surprised if a true freshmen QB (either Forcier or Beaver) is starting against us. Rich Rodriguez is a good coach though, so I expect them to be better. Nothing is ever easy in the Big House.
Michigan State – No Javon Ringer next year, but Dantonio is a good coach who has created a winning environment in East Lansing.
Purdue – No Painter or Sheets or Orton plus a new coach. Purdue will be one of the 2-3 worst teams in the Big 10 next year.
Washington – Another school that will be tough to get a read on. How long will it take for them to recover from the malaise of the Willingham era?? We’ll probably have to keep an eye on who they bring as a head coach for next year. If they hire a Mike Leach type coach, they could become a dangerous team overnight.
USC – I know it’s a home game, but we are light years away from USC as a football program. USC playing Notre Dame is not that much different than USC going to play teams like Arizona and Stanford these days.
BC – This game is coming after the USC game, BC is always fired up to play ND, and they have spanked us the last two years. Not a whole lot else that needs to be said. I’m counting BC as a likely loss until proven otherwise.
Washington St – This team will be the Syracuse of 2009. An atrocious team that we have no business losing to.
Navy – Gimme game
Pitt – Sounds like LeSean McCoy is coming back, which instantly makes them a pretty tough team. We also probably will not have the luxury of playing them without Bill Stoll next year. Most of their team is back next year, so I expect them to be ranked when we play them.
Connecticut – There is absolutely no reason we should lose to UConn at home, but they will probably treat this game like the Super Bowl. We better be ready to go.
Stanford – Harbaugh has not turned the corner with this program yet, but I get the impression that they are close. I’m predicting 8 wins for the Cardinal next year.
It’s certainly not a tough schedule, but there is one heavyweight (USC), 4-5 toss ups (Michigan, MSU, BC, Pitt), 4-5 potentially feisty underdogs (Nevada, Washington, Connecticut, Stanford), and 3 likely gimmes (Purdue, Washington St, Navy). I could see ND surging to 10 wins, but I could very easily see 8 wins or even 6 again.
3) What type of record are ND fans looking for?? 9 wins? 10? BCS game?? If Weis goes 8-4 next year, is ND going to fire him?? I can’t see it. I honestly don’t think he’s in any real danger of getting fired even after next year unless he goes 6-6 again. ND has committed $30 million to this guy. He is likely going to be around longer than next year as long as he shows improvement.
I will likely go to a bunch of games next year and talk myself into the Irish being better next year, but I have to say that I am very apathetic about this program at the moment. It's hard to get excited about Charlie Weis now that we have seen what his teams have done the last two years. ND is the most underachieving program in the country at the moment, and it's obvious to anyone who watches this team on a regular basis. That fact is incredibly frustrating.
Stay tuned to WEISND throughout the offseason for more thoughts on the upcoming season and what Charlie Weis needs to do to get this program back on track.
2) Speaking of coaching changes, I am a fan of what Tennessee did with the Lane Kiffin hire. There’s some risk of course considering his age and lack of head coaching experience, but look at his pedigree. He was the offensive coordinator at USC at the age of 30, he’s got football in his bloodlines, learned under Pete Carroll how to run a program, and he actually did some nice things with the Raiders in spite of the complete incompetence of that organization. It appears that he has hired a good staff with Ed Orgeron likely coming on board and possibly Kiffin’s dad, Monte Kiffin.
Phil Fulmer had a successful career at UT, but the guy was running the program into the ground the last few years. Tennessee needed to find a Bruce Pearl type figure who could get out there and sell the program nationally. Kiffin has the energy and connections to do that. I’d rather take a chance on a Lane Kiffin than hire some retread coach. He may be a bust, but he may end up becoming the next Bob Stoops. At least he has a high ceiling. Might as well roll the dice.
As great as the SEC has been the last few years, things are always cyclical in college football. Florida and Bama appear to be poised to dominate that conference as long as their coaches are there, but there is a lot of room to move in the rest of that conference. LSU may have already peaked as a program (more on that later), Auburn is declining, Spurrier might be retiring from South Carolina, and Georgia had a disappointing year. If Kiffin can put some life into that Tennessee offense over the next few years, he could quickly move them up towards the top of the SEC. And if Urban Meyer jumps ship at some point, the SEC East could be wide open.
Tennessee might be down now, but they have a brand name and tradition. It is going to take a lot of work for Kiffin to recruit and rebuild that program, but it can be done. Good hire.
1) Finally, I know I mentioned it last week, but I cannot believe that Oklahoma is getting a free pass to the title game in spite of their history of choking in big bowl games. I watched a good chunk of the Oklahoma-Oklahoma State game last weekend, and I just don’t see it with this Oklahoma team. No one is playing any defense in the Big 12!!! Bradford goes back to pass and has 3 wide open receivers to choose from. Does anyone really think he’d be able to do that against Florida or USC?? Those teams would punch OU in the mouth right out of the chute, and they would fold just like they have in other big bowl games. I would bet any amount of money that USC would beat Oklahoma on a neutral field. How are the Trojans any less qualified to play in the title game than OU?? They both have lost one game. OU might have a better loss this year, but USC has always proven that they are the best big game program in the country. That should count for something.
I don’t know what is going on in the Big 12 these days, but the defenses in that league are atrocious. Bad tackling, very soft, and completely overmatched by the offensive firepower. Maybe these Big 12 teams just put their best athletes on offense or something.
I cannot wait to bet against Oklahoma in the title game. I think they are a good team, but I have a feeling that they are about to get exposed.
7) While I personally would have preferred to part ways with Weis after this season, I can’t say that I am surprised at all that a decision was made to bring Weis back next year. What indication did Swarbrick give at any point that he planned to make a coaching change?? He publicly defended Weis during the Navy game after that horrific performance at Boston College, and he said heading into the USC game that he intended to sit down with Weis after the season. And yet somehow internet message board posters interpreted that to mean that the “silence is deafening” and a bunch of other nonsense. The people on NDNation seemed to believe that Swarbrick was conducting some sort of super secret coaching search prior to his scheduled meeting with Weis. Other than blind hope, where do people come up with this stuff?? If anything, the silence from Swarbrick immediately after the season was a strong indication that Weis was coming back next year. If he was going to get fired, why not announce it the day after the USC game?? What school has ever waited two weeks before announcing that their coach is fired??
Swarbrick has been the AD at Notre Dame for 5 months. When he got hired to be the AD at ND, he most likely assumed that his biggest tasks would be to oversee the renovation of the JACC, be the lead negotiator on the BCS deal and a possible new Notre Dame tv network, and figuring out ways to raise cash for the school. He's not a football guy at all. What credentials does Swarbrick have to identify a football coach?? He has zero football background. I would bet that everyone reading this blog knows more football than Swarbrick. He wasn't in any position to make a critical evaluation of the head football coach. ND could have gone out and found an AD who knows sports and has experience in making these types of coaching evaluations, but they went in a different direction and hired a guy who specializes in contract law and business negotiations. If there was ever any doubt about where the priorities of the priests running ND are, that is your answer.
6) This decision may also be a timing thing. Perhaps Swarbrick just thought that a change this year was bad timing, and he wanted to wait a year to see if some things fall into our lap. That actually makes sense to me. We've had bad luck on timing in past coaching searches, so maybe Swarbrick just needs another year to see how the team plays and to see if any big coaching moves open up a path for a big name to come to ND. What if Urban Meyer goes to the NFL or something, fails, and wants to come back to college?? Plus, maybe Brian Kelly goes 11-1 next year and wins a BCS bowl over a big time team and becomes an obvious "tier 1" candidate. A lot can change in the next year. Let's be honest, half the ND fanbase would have freaked out if we had announced Chris Peterson as the new ND head coach next week.
At the end of the day, one more year to see what Weis can do isn't going to kill the program. He's still recruiting well. If he stinks again, he's probably done. By then, we’ll have another whole year of data to judge the young coaches and see if any of the big names get restless. Guys like Brian Kelly and Chris Peterson will still be around next year for us to look at. It’s not necessarily a bad thing to see if Brian Kelly can continue to win at UC. If he wins big again next year, ND fans might feel like he is a safer bet than he is right now.
And if Weis is great next year, then it was worth it to keep him around.
5) Since it appears that the buyout was a prohibitive factor for firing Weis this year, isn’t the buyout going to be a potential problem again next year if we have another disappointing season?? If the buyout is $20 million this year, isn’t it still going to be $17 or so million next year?? At some point, we are going to be in the unfortunate position of ponying up some serious cash to dump Weis.
This buyout thing is remarkable to me. We handed Weis a GUARANTEED $30 million with no out clause after a half season of football. How is that even possible?? I swear, ND burns through money like no one else.
4) What is the over/under going to be on wins next year now that Weis is coming back?? I’d probably put it in the 7.5-8 range.
S05 NEVADA
S12 @ Michigan
S19 MICHIGAN ST.
S26 @ Purdue
O03 WASHINGTON
O17 SOUTHERN CAL
O24 BOSTON COLLEGE
O31 Washington St. (SA)
N07 NAVY
N14 @ Pittsburgh
N21 CONNECTICUT
N28 @ Stanford
On paper, that schedule looks easy, but is there a lock win on there other than Navy and maybe Wazzou considering how poorly we played down the stretch??
Nevada – They were 7-5 this year, but they put up over 500 yards of offense a game. Sounds like most of their team will be back next year. Could be a scary game in the opener
Michigan – Tough to really say what they will look like next year, but I would hazard a guess that they will be better. Perhaps much better. Still have the QB issues going into next year, and I wouldn’t be surprised if a true freshmen QB (either Forcier or Beaver) is starting against us. Rich Rodriguez is a good coach though, so I expect them to be better. Nothing is ever easy in the Big House.
Michigan State – No Javon Ringer next year, but Dantonio is a good coach who has created a winning environment in East Lansing.
Purdue – No Painter or Sheets or Orton plus a new coach. Purdue will be one of the 2-3 worst teams in the Big 10 next year.
Washington – Another school that will be tough to get a read on. How long will it take for them to recover from the malaise of the Willingham era?? We’ll probably have to keep an eye on who they bring as a head coach for next year. If they hire a Mike Leach type coach, they could become a dangerous team overnight.
USC – I know it’s a home game, but we are light years away from USC as a football program. USC playing Notre Dame is not that much different than USC going to play teams like Arizona and Stanford these days.
BC – This game is coming after the USC game, BC is always fired up to play ND, and they have spanked us the last two years. Not a whole lot else that needs to be said. I’m counting BC as a likely loss until proven otherwise.
Washington St – This team will be the Syracuse of 2009. An atrocious team that we have no business losing to.
Navy – Gimme game
Pitt – Sounds like LeSean McCoy is coming back, which instantly makes them a pretty tough team. We also probably will not have the luxury of playing them without Bill Stoll next year. Most of their team is back next year, so I expect them to be ranked when we play them.
Connecticut – There is absolutely no reason we should lose to UConn at home, but they will probably treat this game like the Super Bowl. We better be ready to go.
Stanford – Harbaugh has not turned the corner with this program yet, but I get the impression that they are close. I’m predicting 8 wins for the Cardinal next year.
It’s certainly not a tough schedule, but there is one heavyweight (USC), 4-5 toss ups (Michigan, MSU, BC, Pitt), 4-5 potentially feisty underdogs (Nevada, Washington, Connecticut, Stanford), and 3 likely gimmes (Purdue, Washington St, Navy). I could see ND surging to 10 wins, but I could very easily see 8 wins or even 6 again.
3) What type of record are ND fans looking for?? 9 wins? 10? BCS game?? If Weis goes 8-4 next year, is ND going to fire him?? I can’t see it. I honestly don’t think he’s in any real danger of getting fired even after next year unless he goes 6-6 again. ND has committed $30 million to this guy. He is likely going to be around longer than next year as long as he shows improvement.
I will likely go to a bunch of games next year and talk myself into the Irish being better next year, but I have to say that I am very apathetic about this program at the moment. It's hard to get excited about Charlie Weis now that we have seen what his teams have done the last two years. ND is the most underachieving program in the country at the moment, and it's obvious to anyone who watches this team on a regular basis. That fact is incredibly frustrating.
Stay tuned to WEISND throughout the offseason for more thoughts on the upcoming season and what Charlie Weis needs to do to get this program back on track.
2) Speaking of coaching changes, I am a fan of what Tennessee did with the Lane Kiffin hire. There’s some risk of course considering his age and lack of head coaching experience, but look at his pedigree. He was the offensive coordinator at USC at the age of 30, he’s got football in his bloodlines, learned under Pete Carroll how to run a program, and he actually did some nice things with the Raiders in spite of the complete incompetence of that organization. It appears that he has hired a good staff with Ed Orgeron likely coming on board and possibly Kiffin’s dad, Monte Kiffin.
Phil Fulmer had a successful career at UT, but the guy was running the program into the ground the last few years. Tennessee needed to find a Bruce Pearl type figure who could get out there and sell the program nationally. Kiffin has the energy and connections to do that. I’d rather take a chance on a Lane Kiffin than hire some retread coach. He may be a bust, but he may end up becoming the next Bob Stoops. At least he has a high ceiling. Might as well roll the dice.
As great as the SEC has been the last few years, things are always cyclical in college football. Florida and Bama appear to be poised to dominate that conference as long as their coaches are there, but there is a lot of room to move in the rest of that conference. LSU may have already peaked as a program (more on that later), Auburn is declining, Spurrier might be retiring from South Carolina, and Georgia had a disappointing year. If Kiffin can put some life into that Tennessee offense over the next few years, he could quickly move them up towards the top of the SEC. And if Urban Meyer jumps ship at some point, the SEC East could be wide open.
Tennessee might be down now, but they have a brand name and tradition. It is going to take a lot of work for Kiffin to recruit and rebuild that program, but it can be done. Good hire.
1) Finally, I know I mentioned it last week, but I cannot believe that Oklahoma is getting a free pass to the title game in spite of their history of choking in big bowl games. I watched a good chunk of the Oklahoma-Oklahoma State game last weekend, and I just don’t see it with this Oklahoma team. No one is playing any defense in the Big 12!!! Bradford goes back to pass and has 3 wide open receivers to choose from. Does anyone really think he’d be able to do that against Florida or USC?? Those teams would punch OU in the mouth right out of the chute, and they would fold just like they have in other big bowl games. I would bet any amount of money that USC would beat Oklahoma on a neutral field. How are the Trojans any less qualified to play in the title game than OU?? They both have lost one game. OU might have a better loss this year, but USC has always proven that they are the best big game program in the country. That should count for something.
I don’t know what is going on in the Big 12 these days, but the defenses in that league are atrocious. Bad tackling, very soft, and completely overmatched by the offensive firepower. Maybe these Big 12 teams just put their best athletes on offense or something.
I cannot wait to bet against Oklahoma in the title game. I think they are a good team, but I have a feeling that they are about to get exposed.
November 11, 2008
Brian Kelly..... clap.....clap........clapclapclap
Some thoughts from yet another devastating ND loss.
12. While I am with Matt in that I am not going to jump up and down over and over demanding that Charlie Weis is fired after this year, I do think it’s time for ND to seriously start contemplating the possibility of replacing Charlie Weis and also start evaluating/contemplating some names as possible replacements. Charlie Weis is an ND alum who has tried to rebuild this program, but he’s not getting it done. His teams are getting steadily worse, and now we are looking at a second straight season without even one half-decent win to hang our hat on. A sign of a well-coached team is that the team continues to get better as the season goes along, but the reality for Charlie Weis is that we’ve been blown out by Air Force and Boston College in back to back seasons in November. A blowout loss to a mediocre BC team can't happen. It just can't. It wasn't acceptable when Ty lost at home to BC in 2004, and the same applies now.
I don’t think keeping Charlie for 2009 causes great damage to the ND program (like it would have if we had brought Ty Willingham back in 2005), but I do think that there are many other coaches who would do a better job with this roster in 2009 than Charlie Weis. I can certainly understand why there are ND fans who want to give him a 5th year to have one last chance to win with his guys, but I personally think we’ve seen enough to know what to expect in 2009 out of a Charlie Weis-coached team. Inconsistent line play, a soft mentality, no identity on offense other than the “Chaos Mode” when our backs are against the wall, mediocre defense and special teams, and a tendency to come out flat at the worst possible times. A good head coach with a reputation for rebuilding programs could come in here, toughen us up, and build a core identity that fits with our young talent.
I really wanted to see Charlie succeed at ND, but Saturday was a death blow to his credibility as the leader of this program. I’m assuming that he will probably be back in 2009, but I think I’ve reached the point where I’d rather pull the plug.
11. Whether or not you think Charlie Weis is the man for the ND job, the “we need to fire all of the assistants” is a bunch of nonsense. Cmon, does anyone really think that the assistants are the primary problem with this program?? In football, everything starts from the top down. The head coach sets the tone for the program and his philosophy for how he wants to play football and win games. If the head coach is determined to have a physical team, those orders are going to feed down to the o-line coach. O-line coaches are just taking orders from up top. The reason Alabama’s o-line is so good this year isn’t because of their o-line coach. It’s because of Nick Saban’s philosophy for how to build your team up front.
This notion that we can fire Latina and bring in some o-line guru to right the ship is laughable. Latina is just taking orders from Weis. We will never have a good offensive line if Charlie Weis spends his 20 hours a week of practice working on installing 14 new offenses and packages. Our lineman should be spending that time pounding each other into the ground.
Plus, what does it say about Weis when he PICKED those guys to be on his staff?? If Latina and Powlus and Haywood are so incompetent, then why have those guys been on the staff the last few years in the first place??
Finally, does anyone really believe that the top assistants out there (special teams, o-line, d-line, Rbs, etc) are going to be clamoring to sign up for the sinking ship of Notre Dame football that is the Charlie Weis era?? Why would the Alabama o-line coach leave Bama to take the ND job when Charlie might not even be around in a year?? Unless Charlie Weis is planning to go completely hands-off and turn over his offense to a coach who knows how to develop a physical team, why would any great offensive coach sign up for this job knowing that they will probably be a lackey for Weis??
Blaming the assistants is bush league. The problems with ND start and end with Charlie Weis. Weis has already started throwing his assistants under the bus with this stunt to take over playcalling for Navy. Wow, bold move. Taking over the playcalling for Navy. That’s gutsy.
Mike Haywood is just as much of an ND alum as Charlie Weis. He deserves better than this nonsense. He never even had a chance to create an offense in his vision. Everything we do is still the Charlie Weis offense.
10. Now that there is some talk of a new coach at ND, the first thing I wanted to address was this absolutely hilarious notion that our coaching search should start with the following names.
1) Nick Saban
2) Bob Stoops
3) Jon Gruden
4) Mark Richt
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH. That’s the funniest thing I’ve ever read. Are we really doing this again?? Does anyone really believe that any of those guys are realistic candidates for the ND job?? Seriously? Did ND fans not learn ANYTHING from the 2001 and 2004 coaching searches?
Why would Bob Stoops leave Oklahoma?? Oklahoma is already a better job than the ND job. He makes a ton of money, he has lifetime job security, he has already reached the pinnacle, and he knows he can win 10+ games every year at OU and have a realistic chance to win a national title.
Nick Saban is not leaving Alabama for god sakes. The only reason he left LSU is because he got the itch for the NFL. It took him less than two years to realize that the NFL wasn’t for him. Now that he has landed back on his feet at one of the elite jobs in college football, I think he’ll be there for the rest of his career. Why would he leave?? He is making $4 million a year at Alabama and is just getting started there. Going to ND would be a step down for him.
Do ND fans realize that those guys are rumored for EVERY college job that opens and yet there is a 0.0% chance that any of them are leaving?? Bob Stoops is a freaking pipe dream. He’s not leaving, and every minute that we daydream about him is a minute wasted as we try to identify the best candidate for the ND job. Spending all our time pining for Bob Stoops is how you end up with Tyrone Willingham and Charlie Weis as your head coach.
We shouldn’t be looking for Bob Stoops or Nick Saban or Mark Richt. We should be looking for the NEXT Bob Stoops and Nick Saban and Mark Richt. Bob Stoops was an assistant at Florida before taking that OU job. Mark Richt was an assistant at Florida State before taking the Georgia job. Nick Saban was the head coach at Toledo before moving up the ladder to Michigan State. The athletic directors at those schools discovered those guys before they became big name coaches, did their homework, evaluated them properly, and came to the conclusion that they would be great head coaches. That is what ND should be doing. Going around and getting rejected by Bob Stoops and Nick Saban is not conducting a head coaching search. Those guys are not candidates for the job, and they never will be.
9. So who should we looking at??
As far as I’m concerned, the guy who should be at the top of the list is one name and one name only:
BRIAN KELLY.
Maybe there are other potentially great coaches out there and I would want ND to look into everyone, but my list would start with Brian Kelly. We should be researching him, interviewing everyone he coached at Grand Valley State, Central Michigan, and Cincinnati, interviewing all his assistants to find out about him, watching film of his teams, and learning everything there is to know about him.
What I can promise to you ND fans that we will find out is that Brian Kelly is one of the very best head coaches in all of college football. The elite of the elite. I’ll start with his record. Kelly started as the head coach of Grand Valley State at the age of 30 and won 6 conference titles and 2 Division II national championships in thirteen years. Then he lands at Central Michigan where CMU had posted the following records in the 5 years before:
3-9
4-8
3-8
3-9
4-7
Three years into the job, Brian Kelly wins the MAC. Not surprisingly, he gets some interest from larger schools and ends up at Cincinnati. I am telling you from firsthand knowledge that Brian Kelly has done an absolutely remarkable job at UC. He literally went EVERYWHERE in that first offseason to drum up interest in the program – radio shows, tv interviews, pep rallies, local events. He hadn’t even coached a game, and he was already a borderline legend at UC. The guy is enthusiastic, he’s intense, he’s passionate, and players absolutely love playing for him. And the results on the field have been even better than anyone could have anticipated. 10-3 in his first year, and now he has UC in position to win the Big East in his second year. And he’s doing it with a 4th string quarterback and a roster put together by bubble gum and shoestring.
The thought of UC football in a BCS bowl was completely unfathomable to me until this year. This is a UC program that would be lucky to draw 15,000 fans to a game and regularly lost to MAC teams. They are LUCKY to get 2 star recruits. The goal for UC football for most of the last 20 years was to eventually become as good as Miami (Ohio). Now they are going to places like West Virginia and winning.
While Mark Dantonio deserves credit for stabilizing the UC program after the Rick Minter era, Brian Kelly has taken the program to an entirely different level. I like Mark Dantonio a lot. He is doing a great job at MSU and I’ve been a fan of his going all the way back to his days as the Ohio State defensive coordinator under Tressel when they won the national title. I was in law school at UC when Dantonio was there, and he did a nice job building a foundation. Dantonio is a good coach no doubt about it, and he’d be an upgrade over Charlie Weis. But if you go and ask ANY UC fan to make a comparison between Dantonio and Brian Kelly, I can guarantee what answer you are getting. Dantonio was good, but Kelly is spectacular. I can’t even tell you how many times I’ve heard a caller on a Cincy sports radio show asking for Brian Kelly to take the Bengals job. The same goes for UC players. There were a ton of quotes in Kelly’s first season from players on the team directly comparing Dantonio and Kelly, and every one of them basically went on the record and said UC was better-coached under Kelly.
Maybe I’ll be completely wrong about Brian Kelly and he’ll fall flat on his face at Tennessee or Clemson or wherever he ends up. But I personally think he has an Urban Meyer type ceiling, and his track record for building programs and taking them to heights not previously experienced is very Meyer-esque. Kelly’s teams play in one speed: FAST. Everyone is flying to the ball, they are going hard for 60 minutes, and they are always attacking. His offenses are exciting, and his defenses really get after it. It is a blast to watch, and I think he would do incredible things if he had an offseason to work with Clausen and Floyd and all our young talent. Brian Kelly would win with this ND roster. BIG. Mark that down.
And trust me when I say that ND fans will absolutely LOVE Brian Kelly. I know ND fans, and ND would love this guy. He’s fiery, but he’s also very positive. He’s a Catholic who would probably crawl through glass to take the ND job. And it would be a nice change to get a classy guy as head coach instead of the arrogant, “I'm going to motivate through my press conferences” crap that we’ve had with Weis.
People talk about Kelly being inexperienced, which is complete nonsense. He’s been a head coach for like 18 years. Yes, most of that was at GVSU, but it’s not like other D-IAA coaches haven’t had success. He’s still only 47 years old, but he’s not inexperienced as a head coach at all. The inexperience card is a complete myth that needed to be debunked.
If ND wants to keep Weis, that’s their call. But I think they should at least be doing their homework on prospective head coaches who have the potential to be great. And I think Brian Kelly could be that guy. If we putz around and decide to make a move in a year or two, Brian Kelly might already be doing big things at Clemson or somewhere. By then, it will be too late to get him to South Bend.
8. The other guy who I have to say I am intrigued by is Will Muschamp. I know this thought might cause ND fans to temporarily pass out before shouting me down with the “ND better not hire a head coach who has no head coaching experience” mantra that you see on the message boards, but I don’t agree with that policy as a hard rule. What if Oklahoma had that same policy when they were looking for a replacement for John Blake?? What if Georgia had not bothered to interview Mark Richt to replace Jim Donnan because he had never been a head coach before?? Is it really a smart policy to rule out promising head coaches?? How do we know Will Muschamp isn’t going to be a phenomenal head coach?? The guy learned at the knee of Nicholas Saban. He is widely considered to be the best young d-coordinator in the game. He’s young, intense, passionate about the game, and players love playing for him. And that’s a guy that we don’t want to interview?? Seriously?? Just because we happened to make two bad hires in Charlie Weis and Bob Davie, two guys who wouldn’t have succeeded as head coaches at any major college school??
I’m of the belief that you either have it or you don’t. Experience is overrated. Hiring a guy because he’s experienced is how you end up with Ty Willingham as your head coach. If a guy learned at the knee of a great coach and has the qualities that make a great coach (leadership ability, philosophy for how he wants to build teams and a program, and ability to motivate college players), he can be successful. While I would prefer a coach who has been a head coach SOMEWHERE even if it’s a MAC school or Mountain West or whatever, I’m more interested in his personal qualities than his experience level. Urban Meyer isn’t winning big at Florida because of his experience at Bowling Green and Utah. He’s winning at Florida because he’s Urban freaking Meyer. He knows how to motivate players and get his teams to play with relentless football, and he’s had those abilities since he was an assistant under Lou Holtz at Notre Dame.
Maybe ND would make a determination that Muschamp wasn't a good fit or that he wasn't going to be a great head coach, but I think we should at least we be talking to him and finding out what he's all about. If he ends up at Clemson and wins, he'll be the Mark Richt type guy who will be turning us down in five years.
7. One idea that has been thrown out there that I actually think might be a decent idea is to hire Lou Holtz as an interim coach for the month of December and the bowl game while we sort through coaches and try to identify the best candidate. I actually love that idea, and I think Lou would be a great transition person for ND to right the ship and create a tougher mentality with this team. You’re telling me that Lou wouldn’t have this team running for 200 yards a game and getting the most out of the talent on this roster?? Of course he would. Lou Holtz knows tough football, and that is what this team needs. He could come in here and light a fire under some guys until the next coach was in place. And if Swarbrick isn’t ready for a coaching search, then a year of Lou Holtz would be just fine with me. He’s 71 years old, but Lou Holtz knows football. He would put his heart and soul into that one year of ND football, and ND’s team and program would be better for it.
6. One of the interesting things that Mike pointed out that I completely agree with is that Weis has proven that top recruits are still interested in playing at ND. While I think Weis has had a lot to do with it, I think his role in the process of getting these kids to ND is a bit exaggerated. I’ll be the first to admit that the Willingham era made me question whether ND could still recruit great talent, but it’s easy to forget that Bob Davie was regularly bringing in top 10 classes to ND before Willingham. ND is still ND. We don’t have quite the overwhelming edge that we used to in recruiting, but we still have a lot of advantages. National tv, national exposure, a promise that you will get a degree from a good school, and a chance to play in big games and big bowl games. If ND comes calling, people will listen. Heck, even Ty was able to get good players when he actually put out the effort. Recruiting to ND is not as hard as it has been made out to be.
Believe me, I am grateful that Weis has restored ND’s recruiting reputation, but I think there are a lot of coaches out there who could recruit to ND. Recruiting alone is not the only requirement for this job. Great coaches can recruit and win.
The quote from Jeff Jagodzinski about his pregame speech to his players and not one of them raised their hands when he asked them if they had been recruited by ND was absolutely SHOCKING to me. I did not know that, but it isn’t surprising. ND has significant talent advantages over schools like BC.
5. Speaking of BC, I wanted to chime in with a few thoughts about my trip to BC for the game on Saturday. While the trip overall to Boston was a great time (Boston has to be right up there among the best cities to visit in the country), I don’t really have a whole lot of great things to say about the Boston College game experience. The campus itself is very nice in a really nice part of Boston, but the football scene is an abomination. The tailgating scene is comically bad with the time restrictions and police hassling you everywhere you go. We had a great time at the tailgate we were at, but BC goes out of their way to put a damper on the potential fun before a great football Saturday.
The stadium itself and the stadium atmosphere is the bigger problem though. Everything about Alumni Stadium screams mid-major. It’s tiny, it has no character or interesting features, and it’s probably the least intimidating stadium structure I’ve ever been in. There are better high school football stadiums in Ohio than Alumni Stadium. Not all small stadiums are a joke either. Nippert Stadium on Cincinnati’s campus is about the same size but is a great place to watch a game. While there isn’t a bad seat in the house at Alumni Stadium, the house itself is so third rate that it really takes away from the experience. The place is absolutely lifeless.
The other problem is the stadium atmosphere is just awful. The student section gets into the game, but the rest of the stadium was practically silent. Very little noise outside of the student section. As an ND fan, it’s hard to get into a game on the road when the home crowd isn’t even into the game. And to make matters worse, the band is piped in through the loudspeakers the entire game. Why are they piping in their band’s music through the speakers?? What is the point of that?? To make the stadium more loud?? If anything, it makes the atmosphere worse because the band drowns everyone out. It’s hard to get into the game when the speakers are blaring BC’s rendition of “He Hate Me” right into your ear the entire game. Not good.
And I don’t want this post to come off as sour grapes. It doesn’t have anything to do with the result of the game or our losing streak to BC. I’ve thoroughly enjoyed the venues at Michigan State and UNC this year even though the Irish lost, so the loss has nothing to do with it. I respect BC’s program, and I wish we had half the heart and discipline that they do. They’ve beaten us 6 times in a row, and they currently have a better football program than we do. I just think their atmosphere is small time, and that made Saturday’s loss even worse.
Will I go back to an ND-BC game at BC?? Absolutely. Any chance to hang out in Boston and see the Irish play that same weekend is a great trip if you ask me, but it’s certainly not because I want to get back inside that stadium again.
4. As we have noted multiple times on this blog, the biggest problem with a potential coaching search is that we have an athletic director and an administration that don’t know what they are doing. None of these guys have the first clue how to identify a great football coach, and it has been proven at this point. The people in charge of the last few coaching searches have gotten caught up in “magic” and “he gets it” and image, even though none of those things have anything to do with football.
I want the next coaching search to be about one thing and one thing only: FOOTBALL. The questions I want the people in charge to be asking include the following:
Is the guy a leader?
Do his players love playing for him?
Is he a motivator?
What is his philosophy for how to build a championship football team?
Does he want to win championships or just coach football?
Does he hate losing to the point of obsession (something that would have eliminated Ty Willingham immediately)?
I would start with those and then start looking at his record and references and all that. The next coach at ND better be a football leader. Weis is not a leader. He knows football without a doubt, but he’s not a leader. Weis talks to the media like he’s a leader, but that act has worn thin and players are tuning him out. Willingham’s problem was that he didn’t care. Davie’s problem was poor leadership and that he didn’t have a philosophy or a plan of action to make ND into a consistent top notch team. He could never figure out an offense or get his players to buy into what he wanted to do, and players didn't buy into his act.
In many ways, the ND situation reminds me of the Bengals’ front office. The administration may want to win, but they want to do it on their terms and remain in control of the big decisions instead of turning it over to professionals. Priests and academic types can’t be selecting the next head football coach at Notre Dame. They don’t know football. They don’t know the coaches and football people who can tell them the real info that they need to make a hire. By all accounts, Swarbrick is just a lackey who is going to follow along with whatever the top dogs in the administration want him to do. If ND was really committed to build a championship football program, they would be bringing in a big time AD who knows sports up and down and has the contacts and knowledge to make the next great hire. Somebody like the AD at Oklahoma or even the AD at a school like Xavier. We don’t have that type of AD in place right now.
ND should start researching the top young coaches in the country NOW and make a decision on who the best coach would be at ND. I don’t care who it is. Tedford, Kelly, whoever. We need to find that guy and go after him. Forget Saban and Stoops. Go get the NEXT Stoops and the NEXT Saban. Those guys started from nowhere too.
3. I don’t want this post to be construed as me giving up all hope for Notre Dame football even if Charlie Weis comes back and serves out his contract. I want nothing more than for Charlie to win the next two games decisively, play tough at USC, and win a bowl game. If we do that and finish 8-5 and he comes back for 2009, I’ll gladly put aside my differences with how he’s running this program and hope that he has a great year in 2009. I don’t see it happening, but I still want to see Charlie turn it around and make this program great. He has worked hard to bring some stability to the program, and I am appreciative of that. I don’t think it does any damage to the program if he comes back for another year, so I’m not going to be devastated if he is back next year. I will still go to as many games (including bowl games) as I can and cheer like crazy and hope that the Irish pull through and become great again under Charlie Weis. However, I think ND deserves a top 10 coach, and there is no way Charlie Weis is one of the 10 best coaches in America. I don’t even think he’s one of the top 50 coaches in the country.
And if the Irish lose to Navy next week (and although unlikely, I don’t think it can be ruled out at this point), I’d like to hear the following out of the ND student section when we take the field against Syracuse:
Brian Kelly.........clap clap clapclapclap.........Brian Kelly..........clap clap clapclapclap
2. Finally, this post would be remiss if I didn't mention the man who orchestrated this entire mess: Kevin White. In retrospect, I can't even get over that we actually did this. We gave a 10 year extension with a $14 million buyout to a guy who had coached half of one season in college football. Absolutely incredible. Was Kevin White just so caught up in the hype that he couldn't control himself?? Where is the leadership??? Where is the common sense to take a step back and evalute the potential consequences of what he was proposing??? He just handed Weis a lottery ticket with no strings attached. I don't even know what to say. Of all of White's disastrous moves at ND (and the list is too long to go through at this point), this one might actually take the cake.
Now, even if we actually wanted to get rid of Weis, it has become so financially punitive that it's almost impossible to do. We have no leverage with Weis. He's in year two of a 10 year deal. We'd be paying him off for a decade if we fired him now.
1. WEISND week 11 poll
6. Oklahoma
5. USC
4. Texas
3. Texas Tech
2. Alabama
1. Florida
Can’t believe I’m saying this, but the BCS is actually working this year. We are poised to have a championship game with the SEC champion and the Big 12 champion squaring off. The two strongest conferences in football. Never thought it would work out that way, but Penn State’s elimination has set up a path for a great championship game. The Florida-Alabama winner is a lock, and the Big 12 is a little messy. Obviously Texas Tech is in if they go undefeated. But if OU beats Texas Tech, we’d have a bit of a log jam. How would I resolve that?? Give me Texas out of the Big 12. They barely lost to Texas Tech on the road but decisively beat OU on a neutral field. Assuming that Texas Tech loses, I’d go with Texas as my Big 12 representative for being the best and most consistent team.
12. While I am with Matt in that I am not going to jump up and down over and over demanding that Charlie Weis is fired after this year, I do think it’s time for ND to seriously start contemplating the possibility of replacing Charlie Weis and also start evaluating/contemplating some names as possible replacements. Charlie Weis is an ND alum who has tried to rebuild this program, but he’s not getting it done. His teams are getting steadily worse, and now we are looking at a second straight season without even one half-decent win to hang our hat on. A sign of a well-coached team is that the team continues to get better as the season goes along, but the reality for Charlie Weis is that we’ve been blown out by Air Force and Boston College in back to back seasons in November. A blowout loss to a mediocre BC team can't happen. It just can't. It wasn't acceptable when Ty lost at home to BC in 2004, and the same applies now.
I don’t think keeping Charlie for 2009 causes great damage to the ND program (like it would have if we had brought Ty Willingham back in 2005), but I do think that there are many other coaches who would do a better job with this roster in 2009 than Charlie Weis. I can certainly understand why there are ND fans who want to give him a 5th year to have one last chance to win with his guys, but I personally think we’ve seen enough to know what to expect in 2009 out of a Charlie Weis-coached team. Inconsistent line play, a soft mentality, no identity on offense other than the “Chaos Mode” when our backs are against the wall, mediocre defense and special teams, and a tendency to come out flat at the worst possible times. A good head coach with a reputation for rebuilding programs could come in here, toughen us up, and build a core identity that fits with our young talent.
I really wanted to see Charlie succeed at ND, but Saturday was a death blow to his credibility as the leader of this program. I’m assuming that he will probably be back in 2009, but I think I’ve reached the point where I’d rather pull the plug.
11. Whether or not you think Charlie Weis is the man for the ND job, the “we need to fire all of the assistants” is a bunch of nonsense. Cmon, does anyone really think that the assistants are the primary problem with this program?? In football, everything starts from the top down. The head coach sets the tone for the program and his philosophy for how he wants to play football and win games. If the head coach is determined to have a physical team, those orders are going to feed down to the o-line coach. O-line coaches are just taking orders from up top. The reason Alabama’s o-line is so good this year isn’t because of their o-line coach. It’s because of Nick Saban’s philosophy for how to build your team up front.
This notion that we can fire Latina and bring in some o-line guru to right the ship is laughable. Latina is just taking orders from Weis. We will never have a good offensive line if Charlie Weis spends his 20 hours a week of practice working on installing 14 new offenses and packages. Our lineman should be spending that time pounding each other into the ground.
Plus, what does it say about Weis when he PICKED those guys to be on his staff?? If Latina and Powlus and Haywood are so incompetent, then why have those guys been on the staff the last few years in the first place??
Finally, does anyone really believe that the top assistants out there (special teams, o-line, d-line, Rbs, etc) are going to be clamoring to sign up for the sinking ship of Notre Dame football that is the Charlie Weis era?? Why would the Alabama o-line coach leave Bama to take the ND job when Charlie might not even be around in a year?? Unless Charlie Weis is planning to go completely hands-off and turn over his offense to a coach who knows how to develop a physical team, why would any great offensive coach sign up for this job knowing that they will probably be a lackey for Weis??
Blaming the assistants is bush league. The problems with ND start and end with Charlie Weis. Weis has already started throwing his assistants under the bus with this stunt to take over playcalling for Navy. Wow, bold move. Taking over the playcalling for Navy. That’s gutsy.
Mike Haywood is just as much of an ND alum as Charlie Weis. He deserves better than this nonsense. He never even had a chance to create an offense in his vision. Everything we do is still the Charlie Weis offense.
10. Now that there is some talk of a new coach at ND, the first thing I wanted to address was this absolutely hilarious notion that our coaching search should start with the following names.
1) Nick Saban
2) Bob Stoops
3) Jon Gruden
4) Mark Richt
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH. That’s the funniest thing I’ve ever read. Are we really doing this again?? Does anyone really believe that any of those guys are realistic candidates for the ND job?? Seriously? Did ND fans not learn ANYTHING from the 2001 and 2004 coaching searches?
Why would Bob Stoops leave Oklahoma?? Oklahoma is already a better job than the ND job. He makes a ton of money, he has lifetime job security, he has already reached the pinnacle, and he knows he can win 10+ games every year at OU and have a realistic chance to win a national title.
Nick Saban is not leaving Alabama for god sakes. The only reason he left LSU is because he got the itch for the NFL. It took him less than two years to realize that the NFL wasn’t for him. Now that he has landed back on his feet at one of the elite jobs in college football, I think he’ll be there for the rest of his career. Why would he leave?? He is making $4 million a year at Alabama and is just getting started there. Going to ND would be a step down for him.
Do ND fans realize that those guys are rumored for EVERY college job that opens and yet there is a 0.0% chance that any of them are leaving?? Bob Stoops is a freaking pipe dream. He’s not leaving, and every minute that we daydream about him is a minute wasted as we try to identify the best candidate for the ND job. Spending all our time pining for Bob Stoops is how you end up with Tyrone Willingham and Charlie Weis as your head coach.
We shouldn’t be looking for Bob Stoops or Nick Saban or Mark Richt. We should be looking for the NEXT Bob Stoops and Nick Saban and Mark Richt. Bob Stoops was an assistant at Florida before taking that OU job. Mark Richt was an assistant at Florida State before taking the Georgia job. Nick Saban was the head coach at Toledo before moving up the ladder to Michigan State. The athletic directors at those schools discovered those guys before they became big name coaches, did their homework, evaluated them properly, and came to the conclusion that they would be great head coaches. That is what ND should be doing. Going around and getting rejected by Bob Stoops and Nick Saban is not conducting a head coaching search. Those guys are not candidates for the job, and they never will be.
9. So who should we looking at??
As far as I’m concerned, the guy who should be at the top of the list is one name and one name only:
BRIAN KELLY.
Maybe there are other potentially great coaches out there and I would want ND to look into everyone, but my list would start with Brian Kelly. We should be researching him, interviewing everyone he coached at Grand Valley State, Central Michigan, and Cincinnati, interviewing all his assistants to find out about him, watching film of his teams, and learning everything there is to know about him.
What I can promise to you ND fans that we will find out is that Brian Kelly is one of the very best head coaches in all of college football. The elite of the elite. I’ll start with his record. Kelly started as the head coach of Grand Valley State at the age of 30 and won 6 conference titles and 2 Division II national championships in thirteen years. Then he lands at Central Michigan where CMU had posted the following records in the 5 years before:
3-9
4-8
3-8
3-9
4-7
Three years into the job, Brian Kelly wins the MAC. Not surprisingly, he gets some interest from larger schools and ends up at Cincinnati. I am telling you from firsthand knowledge that Brian Kelly has done an absolutely remarkable job at UC. He literally went EVERYWHERE in that first offseason to drum up interest in the program – radio shows, tv interviews, pep rallies, local events. He hadn’t even coached a game, and he was already a borderline legend at UC. The guy is enthusiastic, he’s intense, he’s passionate, and players absolutely love playing for him. And the results on the field have been even better than anyone could have anticipated. 10-3 in his first year, and now he has UC in position to win the Big East in his second year. And he’s doing it with a 4th string quarterback and a roster put together by bubble gum and shoestring.
The thought of UC football in a BCS bowl was completely unfathomable to me until this year. This is a UC program that would be lucky to draw 15,000 fans to a game and regularly lost to MAC teams. They are LUCKY to get 2 star recruits. The goal for UC football for most of the last 20 years was to eventually become as good as Miami (Ohio). Now they are going to places like West Virginia and winning.
While Mark Dantonio deserves credit for stabilizing the UC program after the Rick Minter era, Brian Kelly has taken the program to an entirely different level. I like Mark Dantonio a lot. He is doing a great job at MSU and I’ve been a fan of his going all the way back to his days as the Ohio State defensive coordinator under Tressel when they won the national title. I was in law school at UC when Dantonio was there, and he did a nice job building a foundation. Dantonio is a good coach no doubt about it, and he’d be an upgrade over Charlie Weis. But if you go and ask ANY UC fan to make a comparison between Dantonio and Brian Kelly, I can guarantee what answer you are getting. Dantonio was good, but Kelly is spectacular. I can’t even tell you how many times I’ve heard a caller on a Cincy sports radio show asking for Brian Kelly to take the Bengals job. The same goes for UC players. There were a ton of quotes in Kelly’s first season from players on the team directly comparing Dantonio and Kelly, and every one of them basically went on the record and said UC was better-coached under Kelly.
Maybe I’ll be completely wrong about Brian Kelly and he’ll fall flat on his face at Tennessee or Clemson or wherever he ends up. But I personally think he has an Urban Meyer type ceiling, and his track record for building programs and taking them to heights not previously experienced is very Meyer-esque. Kelly’s teams play in one speed: FAST. Everyone is flying to the ball, they are going hard for 60 minutes, and they are always attacking. His offenses are exciting, and his defenses really get after it. It is a blast to watch, and I think he would do incredible things if he had an offseason to work with Clausen and Floyd and all our young talent. Brian Kelly would win with this ND roster. BIG. Mark that down.
And trust me when I say that ND fans will absolutely LOVE Brian Kelly. I know ND fans, and ND would love this guy. He’s fiery, but he’s also very positive. He’s a Catholic who would probably crawl through glass to take the ND job. And it would be a nice change to get a classy guy as head coach instead of the arrogant, “I'm going to motivate through my press conferences” crap that we’ve had with Weis.
People talk about Kelly being inexperienced, which is complete nonsense. He’s been a head coach for like 18 years. Yes, most of that was at GVSU, but it’s not like other D-IAA coaches haven’t had success. He’s still only 47 years old, but he’s not inexperienced as a head coach at all. The inexperience card is a complete myth that needed to be debunked.
If ND wants to keep Weis, that’s their call. But I think they should at least be doing their homework on prospective head coaches who have the potential to be great. And I think Brian Kelly could be that guy. If we putz around and decide to make a move in a year or two, Brian Kelly might already be doing big things at Clemson or somewhere. By then, it will be too late to get him to South Bend.
8. The other guy who I have to say I am intrigued by is Will Muschamp. I know this thought might cause ND fans to temporarily pass out before shouting me down with the “ND better not hire a head coach who has no head coaching experience” mantra that you see on the message boards, but I don’t agree with that policy as a hard rule. What if Oklahoma had that same policy when they were looking for a replacement for John Blake?? What if Georgia had not bothered to interview Mark Richt to replace Jim Donnan because he had never been a head coach before?? Is it really a smart policy to rule out promising head coaches?? How do we know Will Muschamp isn’t going to be a phenomenal head coach?? The guy learned at the knee of Nicholas Saban. He is widely considered to be the best young d-coordinator in the game. He’s young, intense, passionate about the game, and players love playing for him. And that’s a guy that we don’t want to interview?? Seriously?? Just because we happened to make two bad hires in Charlie Weis and Bob Davie, two guys who wouldn’t have succeeded as head coaches at any major college school??
I’m of the belief that you either have it or you don’t. Experience is overrated. Hiring a guy because he’s experienced is how you end up with Ty Willingham as your head coach. If a guy learned at the knee of a great coach and has the qualities that make a great coach (leadership ability, philosophy for how he wants to build teams and a program, and ability to motivate college players), he can be successful. While I would prefer a coach who has been a head coach SOMEWHERE even if it’s a MAC school or Mountain West or whatever, I’m more interested in his personal qualities than his experience level. Urban Meyer isn’t winning big at Florida because of his experience at Bowling Green and Utah. He’s winning at Florida because he’s Urban freaking Meyer. He knows how to motivate players and get his teams to play with relentless football, and he’s had those abilities since he was an assistant under Lou Holtz at Notre Dame.
Maybe ND would make a determination that Muschamp wasn't a good fit or that he wasn't going to be a great head coach, but I think we should at least we be talking to him and finding out what he's all about. If he ends up at Clemson and wins, he'll be the Mark Richt type guy who will be turning us down in five years.
7. One idea that has been thrown out there that I actually think might be a decent idea is to hire Lou Holtz as an interim coach for the month of December and the bowl game while we sort through coaches and try to identify the best candidate. I actually love that idea, and I think Lou would be a great transition person for ND to right the ship and create a tougher mentality with this team. You’re telling me that Lou wouldn’t have this team running for 200 yards a game and getting the most out of the talent on this roster?? Of course he would. Lou Holtz knows tough football, and that is what this team needs. He could come in here and light a fire under some guys until the next coach was in place. And if Swarbrick isn’t ready for a coaching search, then a year of Lou Holtz would be just fine with me. He’s 71 years old, but Lou Holtz knows football. He would put his heart and soul into that one year of ND football, and ND’s team and program would be better for it.
6. One of the interesting things that Mike pointed out that I completely agree with is that Weis has proven that top recruits are still interested in playing at ND. While I think Weis has had a lot to do with it, I think his role in the process of getting these kids to ND is a bit exaggerated. I’ll be the first to admit that the Willingham era made me question whether ND could still recruit great talent, but it’s easy to forget that Bob Davie was regularly bringing in top 10 classes to ND before Willingham. ND is still ND. We don’t have quite the overwhelming edge that we used to in recruiting, but we still have a lot of advantages. National tv, national exposure, a promise that you will get a degree from a good school, and a chance to play in big games and big bowl games. If ND comes calling, people will listen. Heck, even Ty was able to get good players when he actually put out the effort. Recruiting to ND is not as hard as it has been made out to be.
Believe me, I am grateful that Weis has restored ND’s recruiting reputation, but I think there are a lot of coaches out there who could recruit to ND. Recruiting alone is not the only requirement for this job. Great coaches can recruit and win.
The quote from Jeff Jagodzinski about his pregame speech to his players and not one of them raised their hands when he asked them if they had been recruited by ND was absolutely SHOCKING to me. I did not know that, but it isn’t surprising. ND has significant talent advantages over schools like BC.
5. Speaking of BC, I wanted to chime in with a few thoughts about my trip to BC for the game on Saturday. While the trip overall to Boston was a great time (Boston has to be right up there among the best cities to visit in the country), I don’t really have a whole lot of great things to say about the Boston College game experience. The campus itself is very nice in a really nice part of Boston, but the football scene is an abomination. The tailgating scene is comically bad with the time restrictions and police hassling you everywhere you go. We had a great time at the tailgate we were at, but BC goes out of their way to put a damper on the potential fun before a great football Saturday.
The stadium itself and the stadium atmosphere is the bigger problem though. Everything about Alumni Stadium screams mid-major. It’s tiny, it has no character or interesting features, and it’s probably the least intimidating stadium structure I’ve ever been in. There are better high school football stadiums in Ohio than Alumni Stadium. Not all small stadiums are a joke either. Nippert Stadium on Cincinnati’s campus is about the same size but is a great place to watch a game. While there isn’t a bad seat in the house at Alumni Stadium, the house itself is so third rate that it really takes away from the experience. The place is absolutely lifeless.
The other problem is the stadium atmosphere is just awful. The student section gets into the game, but the rest of the stadium was practically silent. Very little noise outside of the student section. As an ND fan, it’s hard to get into a game on the road when the home crowd isn’t even into the game. And to make matters worse, the band is piped in through the loudspeakers the entire game. Why are they piping in their band’s music through the speakers?? What is the point of that?? To make the stadium more loud?? If anything, it makes the atmosphere worse because the band drowns everyone out. It’s hard to get into the game when the speakers are blaring BC’s rendition of “He Hate Me” right into your ear the entire game. Not good.
And I don’t want this post to come off as sour grapes. It doesn’t have anything to do with the result of the game or our losing streak to BC. I’ve thoroughly enjoyed the venues at Michigan State and UNC this year even though the Irish lost, so the loss has nothing to do with it. I respect BC’s program, and I wish we had half the heart and discipline that they do. They’ve beaten us 6 times in a row, and they currently have a better football program than we do. I just think their atmosphere is small time, and that made Saturday’s loss even worse.
Will I go back to an ND-BC game at BC?? Absolutely. Any chance to hang out in Boston and see the Irish play that same weekend is a great trip if you ask me, but it’s certainly not because I want to get back inside that stadium again.
4. As we have noted multiple times on this blog, the biggest problem with a potential coaching search is that we have an athletic director and an administration that don’t know what they are doing. None of these guys have the first clue how to identify a great football coach, and it has been proven at this point. The people in charge of the last few coaching searches have gotten caught up in “magic” and “he gets it” and image, even though none of those things have anything to do with football.
I want the next coaching search to be about one thing and one thing only: FOOTBALL. The questions I want the people in charge to be asking include the following:
Is the guy a leader?
Do his players love playing for him?
Is he a motivator?
What is his philosophy for how to build a championship football team?
Does he want to win championships or just coach football?
Does he hate losing to the point of obsession (something that would have eliminated Ty Willingham immediately)?
I would start with those and then start looking at his record and references and all that. The next coach at ND better be a football leader. Weis is not a leader. He knows football without a doubt, but he’s not a leader. Weis talks to the media like he’s a leader, but that act has worn thin and players are tuning him out. Willingham’s problem was that he didn’t care. Davie’s problem was poor leadership and that he didn’t have a philosophy or a plan of action to make ND into a consistent top notch team. He could never figure out an offense or get his players to buy into what he wanted to do, and players didn't buy into his act.
In many ways, the ND situation reminds me of the Bengals’ front office. The administration may want to win, but they want to do it on their terms and remain in control of the big decisions instead of turning it over to professionals. Priests and academic types can’t be selecting the next head football coach at Notre Dame. They don’t know football. They don’t know the coaches and football people who can tell them the real info that they need to make a hire. By all accounts, Swarbrick is just a lackey who is going to follow along with whatever the top dogs in the administration want him to do. If ND was really committed to build a championship football program, they would be bringing in a big time AD who knows sports up and down and has the contacts and knowledge to make the next great hire. Somebody like the AD at Oklahoma or even the AD at a school like Xavier. We don’t have that type of AD in place right now.
ND should start researching the top young coaches in the country NOW and make a decision on who the best coach would be at ND. I don’t care who it is. Tedford, Kelly, whoever. We need to find that guy and go after him. Forget Saban and Stoops. Go get the NEXT Stoops and the NEXT Saban. Those guys started from nowhere too.
3. I don’t want this post to be construed as me giving up all hope for Notre Dame football even if Charlie Weis comes back and serves out his contract. I want nothing more than for Charlie to win the next two games decisively, play tough at USC, and win a bowl game. If we do that and finish 8-5 and he comes back for 2009, I’ll gladly put aside my differences with how he’s running this program and hope that he has a great year in 2009. I don’t see it happening, but I still want to see Charlie turn it around and make this program great. He has worked hard to bring some stability to the program, and I am appreciative of that. I don’t think it does any damage to the program if he comes back for another year, so I’m not going to be devastated if he is back next year. I will still go to as many games (including bowl games) as I can and cheer like crazy and hope that the Irish pull through and become great again under Charlie Weis. However, I think ND deserves a top 10 coach, and there is no way Charlie Weis is one of the 10 best coaches in America. I don’t even think he’s one of the top 50 coaches in the country.
And if the Irish lose to Navy next week (and although unlikely, I don’t think it can be ruled out at this point), I’d like to hear the following out of the ND student section when we take the field against Syracuse:
Brian Kelly.........clap clap clapclapclap.........Brian Kelly..........clap clap clapclapclap
2. Finally, this post would be remiss if I didn't mention the man who orchestrated this entire mess: Kevin White. In retrospect, I can't even get over that we actually did this. We gave a 10 year extension with a $14 million buyout to a guy who had coached half of one season in college football. Absolutely incredible. Was Kevin White just so caught up in the hype that he couldn't control himself?? Where is the leadership??? Where is the common sense to take a step back and evalute the potential consequences of what he was proposing??? He just handed Weis a lottery ticket with no strings attached. I don't even know what to say. Of all of White's disastrous moves at ND (and the list is too long to go through at this point), this one might actually take the cake.
Now, even if we actually wanted to get rid of Weis, it has become so financially punitive that it's almost impossible to do. We have no leverage with Weis. He's in year two of a 10 year deal. We'd be paying him off for a decade if we fired him now.
1. WEISND week 11 poll
6. Oklahoma
5. USC
4. Texas
3. Texas Tech
2. Alabama
1. Florida
Can’t believe I’m saying this, but the BCS is actually working this year. We are poised to have a championship game with the SEC champion and the Big 12 champion squaring off. The two strongest conferences in football. Never thought it would work out that way, but Penn State’s elimination has set up a path for a great championship game. The Florida-Alabama winner is a lock, and the Big 12 is a little messy. Obviously Texas Tech is in if they go undefeated. But if OU beats Texas Tech, we’d have a bit of a log jam. How would I resolve that?? Give me Texas out of the Big 12. They barely lost to Texas Tech on the road but decisively beat OU on a neutral field. Assuming that Texas Tech loses, I’d go with Texas as my Big 12 representative for being the best and most consistent team.
November 09, 2008
A Sad Day
This isn't going to be a rant against Charlie Weis or a call for his immediate firing. I did enough of that last night. It's more just about how sad of a day is for the ND Nation. I really wanted Charlie to succeed. He's an ND alum, and he definitely gets "it". From Pass Right, to having the ND players stand with Navy post-game, to Hannah and Friends and all the other stuff, I really wanted to see Charlie succeed.
But something has gone wrong the past couple of years. Last night for me was about as low as it can get as an ND fan. Sure, I think that Navy will establish a 2 game winning streak against the Irish this year, which is embarrassing enough, but to not even show up against BC, freaking Boston College, in what many were calling a must-win game is pathetic. It appears to me that the players have tuned Weis out and in effect quit on their head coach. It's one thing to lose games like Pitt and UNC where you play decently but lose (although both of those are still inexcusable in my opinion). But to quit on your coach is about as troubling a sign as you can have as a fan of a program. BC is not that good! Their offense was terrible, and consisted primarily of one play - the shotgun QB option read. But the book is out on a Charlie Weis offense. You only need to rush 3 because the offensive line is so bad you will still get pressure. Don't even worry about the run because when they run your three man front will be able to make the play. And drop 8 into coverage and totally confuse Clausen. Is it just me or did Butch Davis pretty much write this book at halftime of the UNC game. Clausen has just not looked the same since then. And for the record, I'm not holding anything against Clausen. He has been put in a horrible position as a true sophomore, having to carry the offense with no running game and no offensive line.
I don't know what the answer is. I'm not going to be marching on South Bend or posting on NDNation every 30 minutes demanding Charlie to be fired. I just think it's becoming more and more obvious that Charlie does not have what it takes to succeed as a college head coach. If he is on the sideline next year, I fully expect more of the same. If we do make a coaching change, I have absolutely zero confidence that the administration is capable of carrying out a competent coaching search.
Someone tell me this: We are Notre Dame. I know we are not the Notre Dame of the 60's or of Lou Holtz, but there is still something special about the gold helmets and Touchdown Jesus. Why should we have to settle for a head football coach...who has never been a head football coach. Why should we be hiring an athletic director...who has never been an athletic director. Notre Dame is not the place to be learning on the job. I really hope Swarbrick proves me wrong. But when the day comes that Charlie is ousted and the coaching search begins, I'll be nervous to log onto espn.com for fear of seeing a headline like "Notre Dame hires Tommy Bowden to revive football program."
Again, I don't know what the solution is. I don't want to hear the youth excuse, or how great recruiting is going. The bottom line is Notre Dame is 1-16 in it's last games against .500 competition. That is beyond horrific. It's totally incomprehensible and should not be tolerated. Losing 17-0 to BC for the 6th straight time while it appears that the team couldn't have cared less, that's what is the most troubling sign. A truly sad day for Notre Dame football. What happens next?
But something has gone wrong the past couple of years. Last night for me was about as low as it can get as an ND fan. Sure, I think that Navy will establish a 2 game winning streak against the Irish this year, which is embarrassing enough, but to not even show up against BC, freaking Boston College, in what many were calling a must-win game is pathetic. It appears to me that the players have tuned Weis out and in effect quit on their head coach. It's one thing to lose games like Pitt and UNC where you play decently but lose (although both of those are still inexcusable in my opinion). But to quit on your coach is about as troubling a sign as you can have as a fan of a program. BC is not that good! Their offense was terrible, and consisted primarily of one play - the shotgun QB option read. But the book is out on a Charlie Weis offense. You only need to rush 3 because the offensive line is so bad you will still get pressure. Don't even worry about the run because when they run your three man front will be able to make the play. And drop 8 into coverage and totally confuse Clausen. Is it just me or did Butch Davis pretty much write this book at halftime of the UNC game. Clausen has just not looked the same since then. And for the record, I'm not holding anything against Clausen. He has been put in a horrible position as a true sophomore, having to carry the offense with no running game and no offensive line.
I don't know what the answer is. I'm not going to be marching on South Bend or posting on NDNation every 30 minutes demanding Charlie to be fired. I just think it's becoming more and more obvious that Charlie does not have what it takes to succeed as a college head coach. If he is on the sideline next year, I fully expect more of the same. If we do make a coaching change, I have absolutely zero confidence that the administration is capable of carrying out a competent coaching search.
Someone tell me this: We are Notre Dame. I know we are not the Notre Dame of the 60's or of Lou Holtz, but there is still something special about the gold helmets and Touchdown Jesus. Why should we have to settle for a head football coach...who has never been a head football coach. Why should we be hiring an athletic director...who has never been an athletic director. Notre Dame is not the place to be learning on the job. I really hope Swarbrick proves me wrong. But when the day comes that Charlie is ousted and the coaching search begins, I'll be nervous to log onto espn.com for fear of seeing a headline like "Notre Dame hires Tommy Bowden to revive football program."
Again, I don't know what the solution is. I don't want to hear the youth excuse, or how great recruiting is going. The bottom line is Notre Dame is 1-16 in it's last games against .500 competition. That is beyond horrific. It's totally incomprehensible and should not be tolerated. Losing 17-0 to BC for the 6th straight time while it appears that the team couldn't have cared less, that's what is the most troubling sign. A truly sad day for Notre Dame football. What happens next?
November 06, 2008
Week 11 Picks
Now that the presidential election is over, America can turn their attention to what really matters. College football and the race for the national championship. Should be another great November.Three fairly interesting tests for the three top ranked teams in college football (whether you think they belong there is another story), and the BCS representatives in the Big East, ACC, and possibly the Mountain West could become a little clearer after Saturday. Personally, I'm rooting for upsets in Iowa City and Lubbock (I'm pulling for Bama though), and any chance to facilitate a USC-Florida dream matchup is good in my book.
While the big stories nationally involve the national title race and the Heisman, the Irish are headed for Boston with their backs against the wall. A loss to BC to send this team to 5-4 would be a disappointing setback for what started as a fairly promising year. BC always gets up for the ND game, so it should be a pretty intense and emotional game for both sides. I'm headed out to Boston for the game, and I'm tired of going to games and seeing the Irish lose. Just win the dang game and give the fanbase some hope.
On to the picks:
Thursday November 6, 2008
Maryland (+3.5) at Virginia Tech (ESPN 7:30pm)
Dan: Virginia Tech -3.5
I am really tired of picking ACC games. They are impossible to get a read on. Virginia Tech is on a bit of a losing streak, having lost 2 straight in conference games. However, despite finding their way into the polls, the Maryland football team has not found its way into my confidence. (Friedgen may have found his way into our fridge though, I’m not sure). I expect Beamer to get his team to bounce back and control this game.
Virginia Tech 24 Maryland 16
Matt: Virginia Tech -3.5
Did you know that Maryland would be 7-1 if not for a silly loss at 2-6 Middle Tennessee State? In the wide open ACC, Maryland is actually pretty much in the driver’s seat. The only problem is they have to go to Blacksburg and get a win. Even with the emergence of an explosive offensive with the vaunted combo of Turner to Heyward-Bey, I don’t see it happening.
VT 29 Maryland 20
Mike: Virginia Tech (-3.5)
Questions abound for the reeling Hokies, who will likely be forced to rely upon their third string quarterback for a second consecutive game. The Terps, however, have shown a remarkable knack for losing games that they should win and, while an off week may be beneficial for most teams, I suspect that Maryland will respond poorly after having an extended period to celebrate their convincing victory over Wake. With Maryland’s ACC title hopes intact, look for another meltdown for a Terrapin team that, like Notre Dame, still lacks an offensive identity. Despite Tech’s problems, Beamer Ball lives on…at least for this week.
Virginia Tech 20 Maryland 16
Doug: Virginia Tech -3.5
Lane Stadium on a Thursday night. Forget about it Terps fans. Spend your Thursday worrying about Gary Williams and the sudden demise of your basketball program.
Va Tech can get themselves right back in the Coastal Division race with a win here. They have a winnable stretch left. Meanwhile, Maryland still has four tough games left. I have no idea who is winning that ACC Atlantic Division.
Virginia Tech 27 Maryland 10
TCU (-2) at Utah (CBS College Channel 8pm)
Dan: Utah +2
Game of the year in the Mountain West! I just can’t bring myself to care about the duel to see who will be the BC bashers. Given that, I’ll take the home team and the points. Good combination.
Utah 34 TCU 31
Matt: Utah +2
I don’t really know what to think of this game. TCU has a great defense, but they did get blown out by Oklahoma. Utah is undefeated, but that win in the Big House doesn’t look so good any more. (What were the odds that Toledo Tom Amstutz would get fired during a season in which Toledo won at Michigan?) I think TCU is actually the better team, but I’ll take the Utes at home.
Utah 20 TCU 17
Mike: Utah (+2)
With Tulsa being exposed at Arkansas last week, there is just one remaining “BCS buster,” a/k/a “complete fraud that would have already lost several games in a legitimate conference.” Although the “Holy War” with BYU looms on Utah’s schedule, it would be nice if TCU could do us all a favor and end the Utes’ charade as a bona fide Top 10 team. Since the game is in Salt Lake City, however, I believe that the Horned Frogs will fall just short.
Utah 24 TCU 21
Doug: Utah +2
With all due respect to Gary Patterson, I like the Utes here. TCU has been shredding everyone, but Utah at home on a Thursday night. That's the only thing going on in the whole state of Utah on Thursday night (unless the Jazz are playing at home that night or there's some big LDS rally), so the locals in Salt Lake City will be fired up.
Utah 24 TCU 21
Saturday November 8, 2008
Ohio State (-10) at Northwestern (ESPN2 12pm)
Dan: Northwestern +10
There is just something about this Northwestern team that I like. They’re scrappy. However, I still went back and forth on this game. OSU was about to blow Minnesota out of the water before they really pulled off the dogs in September. And Northwestern and Minnesota are about the same team. However, I just can’t take OSU to beat someone by 10 points on the road.
OSU 27 Northwestern 18
Matt: Ohio State -10
It’s going to be a Buckeyes home game in Chicago like normal, so I really don’t see this being a true road test. Northwestern got a gift victory last week in Minnesota, and I really don’t see them being able to rekindle the magic with a backup QB and no Tyrell Sutton against the Bucks coming off a bye.
Ohio State 38 Northwestern 24
Mike: Ohio State (-10):
The Buckeyes always seem to have their way with Northwestern and this game should be consistent with the historical trend. Ohio State is well reenergized after an off week, while Northwestern is coming off a draining, emotional win. I was impressed by Mike Kafka last week, especially as a runner, but Kafka will find the Ohio State defense to be far more formidable than Minnesota. Furthermore, I suspect that this will be a de facto home game for Ohio State, as the Buckeye faithful are sure to travel in waves to Evanston.
Ohio State 35 Northwestern 14
Doug: Ohio State -10
If not for the turnaround jobs performed by Mark Dantonio and Tim Brewster in the last couple years, Pat Fitzgerald would probably be the story of the year for what he has done at Northwestern. There isn't a classier or better spoken coach out there than Fitzgerald. Class act all the way. I've been following this guy since I was a kid, and I've always been a fan of his. I hope he stays at Northwestern forever. Even though he is probably going to get some interest from bigger schools someday, I almost get the impression that he is on a mission and that he already has his dream job. I think he will win a Big 10 title at Northwestern before it's all said and done.
On that note, I really like the Buckeyes to bounce back and dominate in this game. Ohio State has a huge edge on the lines, and Pryor is going to be able to run on this Northwestern team. Beanie left, Beanie right, Pryor scramble, some passes down the field. Northwestern will not be able to hang with any of that. Ohio State has owned Northwestern in recent years, and it all starts up front. They have overwhelmed the Cats with physical play.
The Buckeyes are coming off a bye week, and I expect to see them re-energized and looking to finish strong in 2008.
Ohio State 31 Northwestern 13
Cal (+19) at USC (ABC 8pm)
Dan: USC -19
Of all the teams in the PAC 10, Cal is probably the one team USC is least likely to take a game off against. Additionally, I think USC is starting to move away from the mid-season lull into the “Oh no, we need to make our way up the computer polls in a hurry” and they start beating the crap out of everyone. As discussed here ad nauseum, USC can easily beat any team on their schedule by 4 TDs. The question is will they. The answer this Saturday is yes.
USC 38 Cal 13
Matt: USC -19
They haven’t been playing any big games recently, but does anyone realize how dominant USC’s defense has been. Their past 5 games they have given up a whopping 4 points a game with 3 shutouts. Wow. I don’t think they’ll have any problem slowing down Cal.
USC 41 Cal 13
Mike: USC (-19):
Cal has put together a nice season, but there seems to be something missing for the Bears that I cannot put into words. Meanwhile, USC has refocused itself after the Oregon State loss, particularly on defense. If USC is motivated, and I expect that they will be, Cal will not be able to stay within 30 points of the Trojans.
USC 41 California 10
Doug: USC -19
I think the smart money here is on Cal, but I'm taking a leap of faith on this Trojan team that the light bulb is about to go off and they are going to vault themselves back into the title game picture. I would much rather be wrong on the Cal Bears and enjoy a great game, but I also don't want to talk myself into Cal and it's 21-3 in the second quarter and "Conquest" is playing every other down. I'm going with the Trojans BIG.
And while I'm here, why is everyone on the east coast automatically going to get Texas Tech and Oklahoma State on Saturday night on ABC instead of the USC game?? I'd rather watch USC-Cal than a Big 12 game between two mid-level programs. I respect what Texas Tech has done this year and enjoyed the heck out of their win over Texas, but they aren't must see tv for the nation at this point. They're still Texas Tech.
USC 37 Cal 13
Cincinnati (+7.5) at West Virginia (ESPNU 7pm)
Dan: WVU -7.5
I’m a big fan of this Cincy team. But I think the Mountaineers have a redeveloped attitude. And I think Pat White and Noel Devine have this team headed in the right direction. Meanwhile, the Bearcats can’t keep a QB healthy. I expect the Mountaineers to get this taken care of at home.
West Virginia 38 Cincinnati 20
Matt: West Virginia -7.5
1st place in the Big East on the line! I said it last week and saw nothing to change my mind in the ‘Neers blowout at UConn. West Virginia is cruising to the BCS.
West Virginia 38 UC 24
Mike: Cincinnati (+7.5):
This is a coaching matchup of epic proportions. Brian Kelly has been able to guide the Bearcats through a rash of injuries at the quarterback position and, as such, his team is positioned for a possible Big East title. By contrast, as expectations begin to rise again in Morgantown, Bill Stewart is undoubtedly plotting to screw things up in a big way. West Virginia has enough talent to tease the fan base into expecting big results, but Stewart’s ineptness will surely result in many more inexcusable losses, including this week.
Cincinnati 22 West Virginia 21
Doug: Cincinnati +7.5
I don't really believe in this pick because UC is not as good as West Virginia and might get blown out at night in Morgantown, but I'm going against the grain and taking the Bearcats. West Virginia is hitting their stride, but I have faith in Brian Kelly to make this game close.
Meanwhile, the UC basketball program is in shambles. Dark days in Clifton. They barely won their exhibition game the other night and just lost their star freshman point guard recruit, Cashmere Wright. I'm beginning to have my doubts about the Mick Cronin era. I like the guy personally and recruits are coming to UC, but at some point the wins need to start showing up on the court (where have I heard that before??) UC also might be in over their head in the Big East. I can't believe I'm saying this after all the years of straining for credibility as a program, but they may have been better off doing what Memphis did and remaining as the "big fish in a small pond." Now, UC is Providence with a slightly better name. The Big East has been great for UC football, but it has sort of made UC basketball irrelevant. Just a thought for now.
I'm praying that Brian Kelly doesn't leave after this year. I think he is one of the best head coaches in the country and maybe the next Urban Meyer, so takes a chance on him is getting themselves a steal.
Cincy 27 WVU 23
Oklahoma State (+3) at Texas Tech (ABC 8pm)
Dan: Texas Tech -3
Texas Tech needs to really avoid a huge let down here. Luckily, I think Oklahoma State is a big enough that Leach will be able to get his team to avoid a let down, especially at home. There is just something special about this Texas Tech team. Even though they let Texas back in last week, and then subsequently lost the lead, I really believe they felt like they were going to win the whole time. That confidence keeps this team rolling, at least until the Oklahoma game, and that includes a cover this week.
Texas Tech 48 Oklahoma State 41
Matt: Oklahoma State +3.5
Give me Coach Gundy to get the straight up W! Classic let down game for Texas Tech. But there are two things that are not even allowing me to concentrate on this game:
1.The Texas Tech bell ringer. Must see Youtube video if you missed him in action last week.
2. Kansas State firing Ron Prince after less than 3 years. Those bunch of racists in Kansas. Didn’t even let the guy get three years. I’m sure Pat Forde will be launching a personal investigation into this matter. At least there should be a Bob Ley Outside the Lines special or Jason Whitlock column.
Oklahoma State 48 Texas Tech 45
Mike: Oklahoma State (+3):
Hats off to Texas Tech for a gutty win over the Longhorns in the game of the year thus far. Now it is time to see whether the Red Raiders can put last week’s win in the rearview mirror and refocus their efforts against an Oklahoma State team that will enter Lubbock with plenty of confidence. As with last year, I suspect that the championship contenders start dropping like flies as we extend further into November. Who will be first victim this month? Texas Tech, of course.
Oklahoma State 48 Texas Tech 42
Doug: Oklahoma St +3
I thought about this game for a bit and it came down to one conclusion for me. I think Oklahoma State has a better football team this year. Texas Tech has the home field advantage, but they are coming off the biggest moment in the history of their program. I think a letdown is in order, and I think this game will play out a lot like the Oklahoma State-Missouri game played out.
Give me the Cowboys! The roar from State College following this game will be deafening.
Oklahoma State 24 Texas Tech 21
Alabama (-3.5) at LSU (CBS Sports 3:30pm)
Dan: Alabama -3.5
I can’t decide if this or the Big 12 game above is the game of the week. But I think this is Alabama’s chance to remind everyone that they are the best team in the country. I have not made a habit of polls so far this year, but now that it is November, I feel the time has arrived. Here is my top 5:
Alabama
USC
Florida
Texas Tech
Penn State
But that’s the top 5 based on the 5 best teams. That doesn’t necessarily mean that is who I think should play in the national title. A lot is said about the 2 best teams playing in the national title game. But you have to consider that, until a playoff is instituted, the entire season is the playoff. Now granted, that has to be balanced with strength of schedule. But I think it is a difficult to be so black/white on the issue.
But back to the game, I think this game, as so many, comes down to line play. And I think Alabama’s line dominates LSU, especially with their defensive line.
Alabama 23 LSU 10
Matt: LSU +3.5
What the hell – your Penn State Nittany Lions will be the number one team in the land on Monday morning. If Les Miles was ever going to pull every single freaking trick out of his hat, this is the one game to do it. The return of Saban to Tiger Stadium. Let’s get one thing straight – LSU is decidedly mediocre this year. Perriloux being a thug really hurt them. But I just think that Alabama has been living on the edge all year and this is the week they go down.
LSU 27 Alabama 25
Mike: Alabama (-3.5):
These teams have opposite track records in big games this year. While LSU has gotten crushed in both contests against formidable foes (no, Auburn doesn’t count), Alabama has risen to the occasion in each meaningful affair. The trend will continue again this week, as LSU’s struggling offense will fall flat on its face against a tough Bama defense in an SEC slugfest.
Alabama 20 LSU 10
Doug: Alabama -3.5
Couldn't ask for more drama heading into this game. Bama is #1 and back in their rightful place as the king of the SEC. Saban is headed back to Baton Rouge. And you have "Have a GREAT day" running the show on the other sideline. I expect comedy, drama, and action all wrapped up in one great Saturday afternoon brought to you by AFCFA (America's Finest College Football Announcers.)
LSU basically plays the same style as Bama, so it will be interesting to see how these teams match up. I've lost faith in LSU this year though. I know they will be UP for this game, but Bama is the better team. LSU lost to Georgia at home. Bama CRUSHED Georgia on the road.
Saban 23 Miles 17
Penn State (-7.5) at Iowa (ABC 3;30pm)
Dan: Penn State -7.5
Is it just me or is something off with this line? I know Iowa has won 2 of its last 3, but really? Penn State can’t beat them by 8 points? I don’t care if it is on the road. Penn State is easily 2 TDs better than Iowa. This is a gimme. I wish I still had money left in my sportsbook account for this one (Damn you ND and Texas).
Penn State 34 Iowa 17
Matt: Iowa +7.5
Iowa comes close, but can’t pull it off. I just don’t see Penn State is not losing a game, like it or not. Here’s my Top 7 by the way:
Florida
Texas Tech
Alabama
USC
Texas
Oklahoma State
Penn State
52. Notre Dame
81. Oakland Raiders
94. Syracuse – Big win for the Orange last week with the home W over Louisville. I know that Louisville is down, but at least it shows that the team hasn’t thrown in the towel on Robinson. Really the only way I see Charlie Weis being shown the door is if the Orange somehow walk out of Notre Dame Stadium on November 22nd with a win. I shudder at the thought.
Penn State 28 Iowa 21
Mike: Iowa (+7.5):
Some pundits have suggested that an unbeaten regular season for Penn State is a fait accompli, but I believe that Iowa will be the first of two difficult tests for the Nittany Lions (Sparty being the other). Shonn Greene is a physical runner who always seems to get his 100 yards and this week will be no different, irrespective of Penn State’s tough front four. Although Greene’s running will allow the Hawkeyes to fight tooth and nail, Iowa’s anemic passing game will cause its upset bid to fall just short. Before a frenzied Kinnick Stadium crowd, however, Kirk Ferentz’s team will scare the life back into Joe Paterno and earn the cover.
Penn State 21 Iowa 17
Doug: Penn State -7.5
You don't know how much I would love to be wrong here. I would love for nothing more than a fired up Iowa team to jump all over a lackluster Penn State team, weather the storm in the 3rd and 4th quarters, pull the game out in the 4th, and then all heck breaks loose at Kinnick Stadium as crazed Iowans tear down the goalposts and burn their firekirkferentz.com tshirts.
But Penn State has been getting dissed for two weeks by everyone (me included). They've been hearing how bad their offense is and how they don't belong with the teams from the SEC and the Big 12, and that they are only in the top 3 because of their schedule. I don't necessarily disagree with all that (in fact, I wholeheartedly agree), but I do think Penn State is going to be looking to make a statement against Iowa. Iowa is much improved with a decent running game, but this game feels like the Ohio State-Iowa game from a couple years ago when everyone was hyping Iowa and they got plowed.
Penn State is fresh and has no reason to overlook Iowa. If it was 2007, I would have picked Iowa to win straight up. But Penn State has been equally as good on the road as they have been at home this year. The week off probably gave them a chance to recharge their batteries. Whether you think it is fair or not, if they win the final three games, they are playing for the national title. They will be ready for this game. I see Penn State taking over this game along the lines and putting away the Hawkeyes.
Believe me, I would love to be wrong. America needs Iowa to win this game and get rid of Penn State and the Big 10 from the national title picture.
Penn State 31 Iowa 20
Georgia Tech (+4) at North Carolina (Raycom 12pm)
Dan: Georgia Tech +4
Reviewing my pics so far, I have far too many favorites. So that makes this game perfect timing. I have been in love with this GT team all year (other than a stupid FSU pick last week). This week is no different. I’m not sure that GT can pull off the win, but they can keep this to a FG type game. Their defense is impressive, and for a Paul Johnson offense, they keep a very good run/pass balance. However, I’ll go out on a limb and take GT in the road upset.
Georgia Tech 20 North Carolina 17
Matt: Georgia Tech +4
Forgive me for going to the lightning round on these ACC games, but I haven’t the slightest idea what is going to happen, nor do I particularly care. I can’t wait for that Utah – Georgia Tech BCS game.
Georgia Tech 27 UNC 21
Mike: Georgia Tech (+4):
In almost every big win this year (see Notre Dame, Connecticut and Boston College), North Carolina has relied upon interceptions to overcome its offensive shortcomings. Unfortunately for the Tar Heels, there will be few opportunities for interceptions this week against a Georgia Tech that rarely takes to the air on offense. In addition, while Georgia Tech has shown an occasional propensity to fumbling, it is unreasonable to rely upon forcing turnovers as a means of winning each week. Look for the Yellow Jackets to pound the ball on offense and neutralize the Tar Heels with a solid performance along the defensive line.
Georgia Tech 23 North Carolina 16
Doug: North Carolina -4
Man, color me nervous about this pick, but a couple things swayed me toward the Heels.
1) UNC coming off a bye week with two weeks to prepare for the GT option
2) GT QB is hurt
If Georgia Tech's qb is hurt and can't run the option, they are in big trouble. I am a believer in Georgia Tech, so I hate picking against them. I just feel like Carolina will be prepared to win this game and has some personnel advantages.
No pressure on Carolina football at this point of the year anyway. Most of the Chapel Hill campus has turned their attention toward the Dean Dome, so the football team did their job. Keep everyone's interest until November.
UNC 24 GT 17
Clemson (+6) at Florida State (ABC 3:30pm)
Dan: Florida State -6
The Seminoles let me down, but if there is one thing I can count on, it’s Clemson sucking. And now daddy Bowden has no reason to pull in the reigns against his son (not that it mattered in the past since Clemson always played well against FSU). This Clemson team is about to experience a late season spiral and it starts on Saturday.
FSU 31 Clemson 21
Matt: FSU -6
Who knows. Clemson somehow won at BC last week. If you are wagering anything other than Monopoly Money on ACC games at this point, you need help.
FSU 34 Clemson 10
Mike: Florida State (-6):
I am certain that some media members will assert that Clemson “still has the most talent in the ACC” and label the Tigers as “dangerous.” Clemson, however, remains a fundamentally flawed team, especially on offense, and there is only so much that interim coach Dabo Sweeney can change at this point. Even without Tommy Bowden, I am not convinced that Clemson has overcome its chemistry issues and I am certainly not convinced that the Tigers have an offensive line that will allow them to run the ball effectively, even with C.J. Spiller back in action. Despite a heartbreaking loss last week, Bobby Bowden will have his upstart team ready to avenge his son Tommy’s firing.
Florida State 30 Clemson 17
Doug: Florida State -6
Wow, Clemson is making some strides, but how did they only win that game against BC by 6 last week?? They were up 14-0 within the first two minutes of the game starting. Clemson is playing harder, but I don't think they are suddenly a good team.
FSU is a good team. They should have beaten Georgia Tech last weekend. I still think they are the best team in the ACC this year.
The ACC is absolutely wacky this year (or bad depending on your perspective). Give me the Noles.
FSU 24 Clemson 6
Virginia (+3.5) at Wake Forest (ESPNU 3:30pm)
Dan: Virginia +3.5
This game seems to be between two teams that over the past 5 weeks have headed in two opposite directions. Yet, Wake is still the favorite here. Somewhat surprising. I’ll stick with Al Groh’s team this week. I was pretty sure they were ready to have an off week last week, but now I think they will bounce back and win this game at Wake. Jim Grobe’s team is in trouble.
Virginia 20 Wake Forest 17
Matt: UVA +3.5
I guess you could say my school spirit has dissipated when I will be skipping homecoming to watch Verne and Gary call the action from Baton Rouge. Wake went to overtime against Duke last week. UVA lost to Duke. Maybe some schools with openings should be getting David Cutcliffe on the phone.
UVA 21 Wake 17
Mike: Virginia (+3.5):
The Cavs may be emotionally fragile after a late loss to Miami, but will it really matter? Wake cannot move the ball consistently against anyone, so there is no reason to expect that things will change this week. Although I still believe in Jim Grobe, this year’s Wake team does not seem to have the recipe for success. In a wild ACC, Al Groh will get his team back on track in Winston-Salem with the consistent running of Cedric Peerman and a stout defensive effort.
Virginia 19 Wake Forest 17
Doug: Virginia +3.5
Wake is not that good. They easily could have lost to Duke. UVA should have won that game against Miami last week. Take the points.
Virginia 17 Wake 14
Louisville (+6) at Pitt (Big East Network 12pm)
Dan: Pitt -6
So, Notre Dame lost to Pitt last week. That’s about all I can think about when I look at this game. The Shady McCoy is good. Louisville is not.
Pitt 28 Louisville 20
Matt: Louisville +6
At this point, as a Notre Dame fan, I really can’t make fun of Dave Wannstedt and make the fairly obvious observation that this is the type of game that he loses. Screw it, yes I can. Pitt goes down at home to a terrible Louisville team.
By the way, Doug brought up the point about whether Charlie Weis would be a Top 50 coach. It’s not even close in my opinion. Hell no. Look at it this way. If Notre Dame were in the SEC, wouldn’t Weis be a Sylvester Croom firing away from being the worst coach in the conference? Who else would you put ahead of him? Maybe Rich Brooks, although he has totally turned around the culture of Kentucky. Bobby Johnson does more with less, Petrino and Nutt have track records, and the rest are obviously far above Weis.
Louisville 31 Pitt 30
Mike: Louisville (+6):
For horse racing fans out there, this is a classic case of “bounce theory.” Pittsburgh is, of course, coming off an emotional win against Notre Dame, whereas the Cardinals must pick up the pieces after an embarrassing loss at Syracuse. Still, there is no disguising the fact that Pitt is completely one-dimensional on offense and Louisville, despite last week’s stunner, possesses plenty of talent on both sides of the ball. In essence, Kragthorpe and Wanny are two peas from the same pod: they will win enough to make you think that their team has turned the corner and then they will subsequently lose a game that they should win. Louisville has more talent than Pitt and they have the powerful psychological edge against a Pitt team that has proven to be incapable of dealing with success. I think this game is a mortal lock so if Pitt finds a way to cover, there is a very strong chance that I will be looking for a second job to pay the bills.
Louisville 31 Pitt 21
Doug: Louisville +6
Yikes. Another one of these games that probably should be played on Big Monday.
God, you just know that Pitt isn't going to show up this week. Louisville's run defense is good enough to keep Pitt in check, and they can score some points on Pitt. I just can't take Pitt in a touchdown win over Louisville. In fact, I think they are losing this game on Saturday, which will temporarily cause NDNation to shut down for an hour.
LeSean McCoy is the truth though. Darn good player. I'm trying to figure out who he reminds me of. Maybe a Cadillac Williams type?
Louisville 30 Pitt 27
Georgia (-10) at Kentucky (Raycom 12:30pm)
Dan: Georgia -10
Color me not intrigued by this game. There are actually some pretty unintriguing games this week. I put my faith in Kentucky to cover a much larger spread against Florida and they spurned me. I think Stafford and Moreno are going to want to exorcise some demons after last week and take out some frustration against a lesser team. I’ll go with favorite once again.
Georgia 31 Kentucky 13
Matt: UK +10
Georgia is overrated. Or maybe Florida is just that good. Was there any doubt that Matthew Stafford was putting up a 3 interception game? I think it’s time for him to drop the ‘hew’ from his first name. Matt Stafford sounds like he could be an NFL QB; Matthew Stafford sounds like a 4.0 med school student.
Georgia 31 UK 22
Mike: Georgia (-10):
As expected, Matt Stafford followed up his fine performance at LSU with a 3 interception clunker in Jacksonville last week. Accordingly, it should be high time for Stafford to tantalize the NFL scouts once again with a strong effort against an undermanned foe. Also, don’t be fooled by last week’s score: the Bulldogs simply ran into a Florida buzz saw that simply cannot be stopped right now (take note, Alabama). Kudos to the injury ravaged Wildcats for a gritty victory in Starkville last week, but Rich Brooks’s crew has no chance to keep pace with Georgia.
Georgia 33 Kentucky 13
Doug: Georgia -10
If this game was at Georgia, I'd probably pick the Dawgs by about 30. Kentucky lost 63-5 to Florida. Georgia is obviously not as good as Florida, but it's still a talented team. They just aren't as good as Florida this year.
While the game is at UK, it's not like Commonwealth Stadium is an incredibly tough place to play. I think the Dawgs come out furious and fired up on Saturday. I like them big in this one.
By the way, Kentucky's head coach next year is going to be a guy named Joker Phillips. Joker! That is the greatest SEC head coach name maybe ever.
Georgia 27 Kentucky 3
Florida (-24) at Vanderbilt (ESPN2 8pm)
Dan: Vanderbilt +24
This Florida team has looked so dominate over the past few weeks, that they are almost too predictably overdue for a let down game. Yet, I can’t avoid that predictable prediction. I think Florida looks good and clearly in charge of this game. But I think Vandy can sneak the late cover.
Florida 42 Vanderbilt 20
Matt: Florida -24
This line could have been 24, 34 or 44. Doesn’t matter. Florida has been playing at another level than every other team in the country, including USC, for the past month. There was a play early in the Georgia game where Moreno made a cutback to go up the middle and Brandon Spikes just came flying up the middle and absolutely decleated him. The Gators have so much team speed that it’s just ridiculous. On offense, it’s almost not fair when you have Demps, Rainey and Percy Harvin on the field. Tebow hasn’t had to carry the team like he did last year.
I will say this – if Florida doesn’t lose another game and still doesn’t play for the National Championship, something needs to be done. The SEC should secede from the union.
Florida 56 Vandy 11
Mike: Vanderbilt (+24):
I arrived at this pick by blending the following factors: (1) the fact that this is a night game in Nashville, (2) Vanderbilt is getting some key players back after an off week, (3) possible overconfidence in the Gator camp after last week’s dismantling of Georgia, (4) legal problems to a Florida cornerback this week, and (5) a good old-fashioned dose of anti-Urban Meyer bias on my part.
Florida 38 Vanderbilt 16
Doug: Vandy +24
I think Florida is the best team in the country, but 24 points on the road in the SEC?? Especially after a rivalry game?? No way. I don't even know if I would do this one at like 12 points or something like that.
Florida wins, but Vandy covers at home. I know they lost to Duke at home a couple weeks ago, but Vandy isn't bad enough to get killed at home. Honestly, if you are really looking to get crazy, throw down a couple bucks on Vandy on the moneyline if you can find a site willing to give you moneyline odds.
Florida is darn good though. The running backs have added an element to that team that they lacked last year. They get the ball to Rainey and others in space, and look out. Harvin is darn good, and their defense is relentless. Couldn't be more impressed with the Gators this year.
Florida 23 Vandy 10
Notre Dame (+3.5) at BC (ESPN 8pm)
Dan: Boston College (straight up)
The bottom line is whether or not you think this ND team is different enough from last year’s team to go on the road and beat a semi-decent team. I don’t think so. I saw far too many aspects last week, and really over the past 2.5 games, to color me suspect. The O-line is really struggling to pass block again. And the run blocking certainly hasn’t improved. Clausen, who held this team together the first 5 or so games, has started to look more erratic, and less capable making “the throw” when required to. The defense has continued to show the inability to stop the run. At the end of the day, it really comes down to the O-Line and D-Line. Until I see some consistently good, not decent, but good, performances from these two units, I cannot predict sustained performance for Notre Dame.
Boston College 31 ND 24
Matt: BC -3.5
I would love to pick the Irish here, but I have seen NOTHING from this team that suggests they are ready to win on the road against a decent opponent. Doug has done a good job chronicling the State of the Irish, and while I would love to share in his optimism, I really can’t at this point. Has Weis clearly upgraded the talent? Yes, no doubt about it. But on game days, I just have no confidence in what I will see on any given Saturday. Whether it was Haywood or Weis, the 3rd quarter against Pitt on the offensive side of the ball was absolutely inexcusable. Three drives, three straight runs up the middle. Look, I don’t want to be Texas Tech East either, but you HAVE to play to your strengths and get the ball to your playmakers. Tate and Floyd have to touch the ball on every drive. Why isn’t Tate getting a few snaps in the Wildcat formation? Why no reverses to him against Pitt? Why didn’t we try the screen to Floyd that we ran against Washington?
I don’t think Weis should be fired no matter what after this year. But anyone who says that they are satisfied with a 7-5 year and a Sun Bowl appearance this year is on drugs. We had the easiest schedule in the country. 7-5 is not what Notre Dame football is about. With an even easier schedule next year (Nevada might be our third toughest game), and the youth excuse no longer viable, Charlie has got to deliver.
As for this game, I’ll take BC to win with a good performance from their defense. That Frank Spaziani guy always seems to come up with a good defensive gameplan against ND. I don’t see why this year will be any different. I hope I’m wrong.
BC 27 ND 20
Mike: Boston College
Charlie Weis, despite his boasts of enjoying a “decided schematic advantage” and other assorted bombast, fails to recognize that football games are won on the field and not in the classroom. Put differently, unless Notre Dame masters the fundamentals, like blocking and tackling, Weis’s nifty little schemes will be ineffective. Unfortunately, and sadly, there is little evidence to suggest that Weis possesses the ability to develop the type of team that can compete against the best teams in college football. Keeping in mind that this is Notre Dame and, as such, the endgame is the national championship, Weis’s failure seems like a foregone conclusion. Assuming that Weis does fail, the Notre Dame administration will almost certainly bungle its next coaching search, as observed in Doug’s post from earlier this week. Scary thought, huh?
You have no idea how much it hurts to type this, but I think we will lose again this week, regardless of the fact that there is no reason that BC should beat us, even in Chestnut Hill. On offense, BC has a subpar running game and Chris Crane has struggled badly at quarterback. On defense, BC has done a nice job against the run, but standout linebacker Brian Toal is injured again and the Eagles lack the athletes in the secondary to keep up with Floyd and Tate. Nonetheless, I expect BC to run the ball enough on offense to keep the clock moving, stop the Irish running game and create turnovers by forcing Notre Dame to become one-dimensional.
I also expect the Eagles to have a giant psychological advantage. BC is coming off two consecutive losses, so they desperately need a win to help their chances of becoming bowl eligible and thereby continuing their streak of consecutive pre-Christmas bowl wins (which, believe it or not, actually matters to BC). Moreover, given BC’s inferiority complex with regard to Notre Dame, the Eagles will come out characteristically motivated for this game. By contrast, the Irish may not have much to play for, given that the team is essentially locked into a second-tier bowl regardless of whether they beat BC. In addition, Notre Dame is also coming off a deflating choke job at home and Weis is not exactly known for his motivational skills. Lou Holtz, he ain’t.
I had been planning to attend this game all year, but I simply cannot fathom the thought of leaving BC’s high school stadium for the third consecutive time with that same empty, sinking, heartbroken feeling. Consequently, I will instead watch the game at my apartment, drink about 20 Genny Lights, curse repeatedly, then vomit and pass out after the Irish lose again. Should be a great time.
Boston College 28 Notre Dame 24
Doug: Present
Oh wait, this isn't a Barack Obama Illinois state senate vote?? I have to take a stance on a tough issue?? Oh. Well, give me Notre Dame then.
While ND has been embroiled in turmoil all week after the heartbreaking loss to Pittsburgh, BC is coming off an equally disappointing loss to Clemson at home. Both programs have been doing some soul-searching this week, and questions are being asked about both Charlie Weis and Jeff Jagodzinski.
I'm sort of on the fence about this game as an ND fan. Before the season, I had this game as one of the 3 games that I thought we might lose. It's BC. As much as we try to deny that they are a rival, they have owned us for a long time. BC is a fundamentally sound program with a lot of seniors, and they have usually beaten us with substance over flash. And let's be honest, BC gets JACKED UP to play ND. They will bring max effort against us on Saturday night. If we turn the ball over or don't show up ready to play, we will be 5-4 coming out of this game.
However, this game is clearly a winnable game. BC presents fewer matchup problems for us than Pitt did, and ND should have a chip on their shoulder. We can certainly win this game if we play 60 minutes of sound football and take advantage of some major matchup advantages.
I'm headed out to Boston on Friday. Looking forward to it except for the ludicrous tailgating policy. Why does BC do that? Don't they want people to get excited about their game?? I can understand some restrictions, but one hour before the game?? Really?? I don't know what to expect in this game, but it should be an entertaining game. At the very least, it's a trip to a great city. If we win the game, even better. Maybe Saturday 11.08.2008 will mark the turning point for the Irish as a program under Charlie Weis.
Some keys to the game:
1) Turnovers - The turnover bug seems to hit this Irish team when we hit the road, so it's certainly something to keep an eye on. We cannot afford to put the ball on the ground, and multiple interceptions by Clausen will also be tough to overcome. North Carolina scored most of their points against us on turnovers, so we have seen the importance of turnovers on the road several times on the road.
As we've seen all year, when you put your entire team's fortunes into the hands of a true sophomore quarterback and a true freshman receiver and a true sophomore receiver, you are asking for turnovers on the road. One missed assignment or one bad throw or one bad route, and you are looking at interceptions. Clausen is banged up, so hopefully he doesn't have problems throwing the ball on Saturday.
We do not want to find ourselves in positions where BC has short field position. They beat us last year with short field position on ND turnovers and bad special teams, and that's how they are going to be looking to score points in this game as well.
2) The ND passing game - Easily the biggest mismatch in this game is the ND pass offense versus the Boston College pass defense. BC has Purdue/Stanford type athletes in their secondary, so we will have an opportunity to exploit them with our two NFL caliber receivers. BC's d-line is strong against the run, but that unit is not as good as Pitt in getting to the passer. Clausen will have time to make plays, and I expect to see him hitting Floyd and Tate multiple times for big yardage. Floyd and Tate have proven time and time again that they can get open against one on one coverage. If you put the ball near them, they will come down with it. Hakeem Nicks shredded BC's defense a couple weeks ago, so Floyd could be in for a huge day.
As some have suggested, we probably should just go to the 5 wides and look to score as many points as we can through the air. Scrap the running game and stay on the attack. We get uncomfortable when we try to run the ball. That's just not our game this year, and it takes us out of our rhythm. When we come out firing like we did against UNC, we look good. Use some occasional runs to keep them honest like we did in the first half against UNC.
Here's my only concern in that regard. I'm a little nervous that the blueprint is being written on our team again this year. Put as many DBs as possible out there to keep our WRs in check and go all out with the pass rush to try to force bad throws. While we did hit some big passes to Tate and one to Kamara, Pitt did a pretty nice job limiting our downfield passing game down. I don't know if that was a part of their defensive game plan or just how the game turned out, but it had an effect on our offense. This offense needs plays down the field to Tate and Floyd. If BC tries to take that away the whole game and makes us beat them with stuff underneath, we are going to need to find ways to do that and move the chains. We had too many drives against Pitt where we stalled out because we couldn't get first downs through the air.
Big big matchup for ND. The ONLY strength of this team is our QB-WR connection, so we are going to need to take advantage of that matchup multiple times. If we can score some points through the passing game and step up defensively, that's the formula to win this game.
3) Chris Crane - Saturday is a critical game for Chris Crane to restore some faith that he can be an effective QB for the BC Eagles down the stretch. He has been incredibly up and down this year. He's had some nice games, but has played really poorly the last two weeks. He was only 18 of 39 in the Clemson game. Not a good completion percentage at all. I can't imagine that he's too accurate. If we can force some turnovers, that would be huge.
Then again, this guy will probably play out of his mind on Saturday. We have a tendency to make bad QBs look good, so I'm expecting him to probably play well. BC is probably going to try to hit a lot of stuff underneath with screens and such to take advantage of our blitzes.
4) The Irish Defense - Not sure what to make of this Irish D. I thought we played really well in the first half, and it was clear that we were really causing Pitt a lot of problems. Unfortunately, the defense completely fell apart in the second half. Everyone in the building knew they were running the ball with LeSean McCoy (they were even direct snapping on multiple occasions) and yet we couldn't stop it at all. Completely demoralizing when you can't stop the run.
Our defense is not a good unit on the whole. I didn't expect us to be a great defense by any means because of the noticeable problems up front, but I still thought we'd see more progress by now. We don't have anything close to a championship level defense. I really think this personnel group might be better suited towards a 4-3 defense. That's just my take. If we put Kuntz and Ian Williams in as tackles with Justin Brown and Ethan Johnson as our ends (and maybe Kerry Neal as well) and then went to a linebacker corp of the Smith Brothers and Crum, it gets more of our best players on the field at once. The 3-4 only works if your d-line is really stout and your linebackers are really good. Our d-line is small, and we have too many mediocre linebackers on the field. We need some more beef on the field, and I'd like to see a transition back to a 4-3 under the leadership of Tenuta.
BC will probably try to establish the run on us in the first half and wear us down. Once the second half rolls around, I expect to see them opening it up more while continuing to pound the run. We better be prepared to man up and be physical.
5) Intangibles- Both teams badly need this game. Will both teams be fired up?? Will ND be able to come off the mat after a heartbreaker in OT?? Is BC starting to question their QB and coach and ready to throw in the towel? How will Weis react to his first trip to Boston as head coach at ND?
My only frame of reference for ND's response to a devastating loss was the Navy game from last year. After ND blew that game in OT against Navy last year, we came out flat against Air Force and got blown out by them. I fear that this team will have some trouble getting off the mat. I would like to think that we'll be fired up and come out on a mission, but this particular group of ND players have been fragile in their emotional state in the last couple years. We will probably know where our heads are at very quickly into this game. The good news is that Corwin Brown was absolutely on fire in the press conference today. Talk about intense. If our team plays with anywhere near his level of intensity on Saturday, we are winning the game. I would like to see that level of intensity all the time in this program. Football is about intensity and emotion. We need to harness that. Corwin seems to feel good about this team and where we are headed. I'm willing to put my faith in those statements.
As for BC, they seem to play above their heads and always play hard, but I'm not sure about Coach Jags as a head coach. He's sort of a Weis-type coach, and I don't know if that's a good fit at BC. BC is the type of school that needs a hard-nosed coach who can get his kids to play disciplined and above their abilities. Jags is more of a player's coach, but that type of coach doesn't work at a place like BC. The players at BC aren't good enough to have a player's coach. I think BC has a lot more issues than might be perceived, and Saturday might be a good time for the Irish to be getting them.
BC usually treats this game as their Super Bowl, but Weis appears to be treating this game as our biggest game of the year as well. I doubt Weis wants to fall to 0-2 against BC in his career.
I am not gonna lie that I am taking a leap of faith by picking the Irish to win this game, but there is too much pride in the ND program to lose to BC yet again. We are the underdogs here, so there is no reason to take them lightly. Charlie Weis knows that the ND community is starting to lose the faith in him, and he knows that a big win at BC could put this program back on a positive trajectory.
One final note. Charlie, will you stop talking to the media after games. You talk to the media like you're the freaking Knute Rockne of motivators, and yet you've never won a big game in your entire career. You come off like a blowhard with the know-it-all nonsense. You tell us every week about how you are getting on the guys and how you've been really hard on the team. Well, why don't they ever seem to play inspired football for 60 minutes?? Just stop talking already and coach your team. Do a Belichick for a few weeks and give out the monotone answers. Or do a Holtz and play coy with the media. No one really feels like listening to your motivational strategies when you are losing home games to Pitt. The arrogance is getting to be quite annoying when the results aren't showing on the field. Win some big games, and then you can talk. I still support you, but I'm tired of the media act.
Call it a crazy pick, but I think I'll be walking out of Alumni Stadium pumping my fist and singing the ND fight song. Go Irish!
ND 31 BC 30
Last Week's Results:
Dan: 4-10
Matt: 8-6
Mike: 8-6
Doug: 6-8
Season Standings:
Dan: 58-58-3 (.500)
Matt: 78-69-3 (.531)
Mike: 75-72-3 (.510)
Doug: 75-72-3 (.510)
Doug: Present
Oh wait, this isn't a Barack Obama Illinois state senate vote?? I have to take a stance on a tough issue?? Oh. Well, give me Notre Dame then.
While ND has been embroiled in turmoil all week after the heartbreaking loss to Pittsburgh, BC is coming off an equally disappointing loss to Clemson at home. Both programs have been doing some soul-searching this week, and questions are being asked about both Charlie Weis and Jeff Jagodzinski.
I'm sort of on the fence about this game as an ND fan. Before the season, I had this game as one of the 3 games that I thought we might lose. It's BC. As much as we try to deny that they are a rival, they have owned us for a long time. BC is a fundamentally sound program with a lot of seniors, and they have usually beaten us with substance over flash. And let's be honest, BC gets JACKED UP to play ND. They will bring max effort against us on Saturday night. If we turn the ball over or don't show up ready to play, we will be 5-4 coming out of this game.
However, this game is clearly a winnable game. BC presents fewer matchup problems for us than Pitt did, and ND should have a chip on their shoulder. We can certainly win this game if we play 60 minutes of sound football and take advantage of some major matchup advantages.
I'm headed out to Boston on Friday. Looking forward to it except for the ludicrous tailgating policy. Why does BC do that? Don't they want people to get excited about their game?? I can understand some restrictions, but one hour before the game?? Really?? I don't know what to expect in this game, but it should be an entertaining game. At the very least, it's a trip to a great city. If we win the game, even better. Maybe Saturday 11.08.2008 will mark the turning point for the Irish as a program under Charlie Weis.
Some keys to the game:
1) Turnovers - The turnover bug seems to hit this Irish team when we hit the road, so it's certainly something to keep an eye on. We cannot afford to put the ball on the ground, and multiple interceptions by Clausen will also be tough to overcome. North Carolina scored most of their points against us on turnovers, so we have seen the importance of turnovers on the road several times on the road.
As we've seen all year, when you put your entire team's fortunes into the hands of a true sophomore quarterback and a true freshman receiver and a true sophomore receiver, you are asking for turnovers on the road. One missed assignment or one bad throw or one bad route, and you are looking at interceptions. Clausen is banged up, so hopefully he doesn't have problems throwing the ball on Saturday.
We do not want to find ourselves in positions where BC has short field position. They beat us last year with short field position on ND turnovers and bad special teams, and that's how they are going to be looking to score points in this game as well.
2) The ND passing game - Easily the biggest mismatch in this game is the ND pass offense versus the Boston College pass defense. BC has Purdue/Stanford type athletes in their secondary, so we will have an opportunity to exploit them with our two NFL caliber receivers. BC's d-line is strong against the run, but that unit is not as good as Pitt in getting to the passer. Clausen will have time to make plays, and I expect to see him hitting Floyd and Tate multiple times for big yardage. Floyd and Tate have proven time and time again that they can get open against one on one coverage. If you put the ball near them, they will come down with it. Hakeem Nicks shredded BC's defense a couple weeks ago, so Floyd could be in for a huge day.
As some have suggested, we probably should just go to the 5 wides and look to score as many points as we can through the air. Scrap the running game and stay on the attack. We get uncomfortable when we try to run the ball. That's just not our game this year, and it takes us out of our rhythm. When we come out firing like we did against UNC, we look good. Use some occasional runs to keep them honest like we did in the first half against UNC.
Here's my only concern in that regard. I'm a little nervous that the blueprint is being written on our team again this year. Put as many DBs as possible out there to keep our WRs in check and go all out with the pass rush to try to force bad throws. While we did hit some big passes to Tate and one to Kamara, Pitt did a pretty nice job limiting our downfield passing game down. I don't know if that was a part of their defensive game plan or just how the game turned out, but it had an effect on our offense. This offense needs plays down the field to Tate and Floyd. If BC tries to take that away the whole game and makes us beat them with stuff underneath, we are going to need to find ways to do that and move the chains. We had too many drives against Pitt where we stalled out because we couldn't get first downs through the air.
Big big matchup for ND. The ONLY strength of this team is our QB-WR connection, so we are going to need to take advantage of that matchup multiple times. If we can score some points through the passing game and step up defensively, that's the formula to win this game.
3) Chris Crane - Saturday is a critical game for Chris Crane to restore some faith that he can be an effective QB for the BC Eagles down the stretch. He has been incredibly up and down this year. He's had some nice games, but has played really poorly the last two weeks. He was only 18 of 39 in the Clemson game. Not a good completion percentage at all. I can't imagine that he's too accurate. If we can force some turnovers, that would be huge.
Then again, this guy will probably play out of his mind on Saturday. We have a tendency to make bad QBs look good, so I'm expecting him to probably play well. BC is probably going to try to hit a lot of stuff underneath with screens and such to take advantage of our blitzes.
4) The Irish Defense - Not sure what to make of this Irish D. I thought we played really well in the first half, and it was clear that we were really causing Pitt a lot of problems. Unfortunately, the defense completely fell apart in the second half. Everyone in the building knew they were running the ball with LeSean McCoy (they were even direct snapping on multiple occasions) and yet we couldn't stop it at all. Completely demoralizing when you can't stop the run.
Our defense is not a good unit on the whole. I didn't expect us to be a great defense by any means because of the noticeable problems up front, but I still thought we'd see more progress by now. We don't have anything close to a championship level defense. I really think this personnel group might be better suited towards a 4-3 defense. That's just my take. If we put Kuntz and Ian Williams in as tackles with Justin Brown and Ethan Johnson as our ends (and maybe Kerry Neal as well) and then went to a linebacker corp of the Smith Brothers and Crum, it gets more of our best players on the field at once. The 3-4 only works if your d-line is really stout and your linebackers are really good. Our d-line is small, and we have too many mediocre linebackers on the field. We need some more beef on the field, and I'd like to see a transition back to a 4-3 under the leadership of Tenuta.
BC will probably try to establish the run on us in the first half and wear us down. Once the second half rolls around, I expect to see them opening it up more while continuing to pound the run. We better be prepared to man up and be physical.
5) Intangibles- Both teams badly need this game. Will both teams be fired up?? Will ND be able to come off the mat after a heartbreaker in OT?? Is BC starting to question their QB and coach and ready to throw in the towel? How will Weis react to his first trip to Boston as head coach at ND?
My only frame of reference for ND's response to a devastating loss was the Navy game from last year. After ND blew that game in OT against Navy last year, we came out flat against Air Force and got blown out by them. I fear that this team will have some trouble getting off the mat. I would like to think that we'll be fired up and come out on a mission, but this particular group of ND players have been fragile in their emotional state in the last couple years. We will probably know where our heads are at very quickly into this game. The good news is that Corwin Brown was absolutely on fire in the press conference today. Talk about intense. If our team plays with anywhere near his level of intensity on Saturday, we are winning the game. I would like to see that level of intensity all the time in this program. Football is about intensity and emotion. We need to harness that. Corwin seems to feel good about this team and where we are headed. I'm willing to put my faith in those statements.
As for BC, they seem to play above their heads and always play hard, but I'm not sure about Coach Jags as a head coach. He's sort of a Weis-type coach, and I don't know if that's a good fit at BC. BC is the type of school that needs a hard-nosed coach who can get his kids to play disciplined and above their abilities. Jags is more of a player's coach, but that type of coach doesn't work at a place like BC. The players at BC aren't good enough to have a player's coach. I think BC has a lot more issues than might be perceived, and Saturday might be a good time for the Irish to be getting them.
BC usually treats this game as their Super Bowl, but Weis appears to be treating this game as our biggest game of the year as well. I doubt Weis wants to fall to 0-2 against BC in his career.
I am not gonna lie that I am taking a leap of faith by picking the Irish to win this game, but there is too much pride in the ND program to lose to BC yet again. We are the underdogs here, so there is no reason to take them lightly. Charlie Weis knows that the ND community is starting to lose the faith in him, and he knows that a big win at BC could put this program back on a positive trajectory.
One final note. Charlie, will you stop talking to the media after games. You talk to the media like you're the freaking Knute Rockne of motivators, and yet you've never won a big game in your entire career. You come off like a blowhard with the know-it-all nonsense. You tell us every week about how you are getting on the guys and how you've been really hard on the team. Well, why don't they ever seem to play inspired football for 60 minutes?? Just stop talking already and coach your team. Do a Belichick for a few weeks and give out the monotone answers. Or do a Holtz and play coy with the media. No one really feels like listening to your motivational strategies when you are losing home games to Pitt. The arrogance is getting to be quite annoying when the results aren't showing on the field. Win some big games, and then you can talk. I still support you, but I'm tired of the media act.
Call it a crazy pick, but I think I'll be walking out of Alumni Stadium pumping my fist and singing the ND fight song. Go Irish!
ND 31 BC 30
Last Week's Results:
Dan: 4-10
Matt: 8-6
Mike: 8-6
Doug: 6-8
Season Standings:
Dan: 58-58-3 (.500)
Matt: 78-69-3 (.531)
Mike: 75-72-3 (.510)
Doug: 75-72-3 (.510)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
